Stove couplers

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dave A
    Site Caretaker

    • May 2006
    • 22803

    #16
    Originally posted by GCE
    Looked at it and thought about it - If the stove is built in , I would say the or comes into play and you can use either method - If the stove is freestanding then it states that it shall use a stove plug and the or bit would fall away

    Do we ignore the implication on the shall wording ?

    I was always taught that if the word SHALL is used it is non-negotiable if the word MAY is used then it becomes negotiable
    To my mind I tend to apply the hierarchy of nested logic operators (more mathematical and coding oriented, I suppose).

    This would deem 6.16.3.3.2 and 6.16.3.3.3 as separate subset options of the "or" logic operator set by 6.16.3.3.1.
    If the requirements of 6.16.3.3.2 is met fully, the result is TRUE (regardless of the result when tested against 6.16.3.3.3)
    Similarly, if the requirements of 6.16.3.3.3 is met fully, the result is TRUE (regardless of the result when tested against 6.16.3.3.2).
    Participation is voluntary.

    Alcocks Electrical Services | Alcocks Pest Control & Entomological Services | Alcocks Hygiene Services

    Comment

    • GCE
      Platinum Member

      • Jun 2017
      • 1473

      #17
      Still think the old grey cover for the book was more appropriate than the present black one.

      Your result would be correct mathematically , not sure about legal eagles reading and coming out with an answer that would keep us out of trouble.
      Is a reason I have always felt that an informal get together with role players could smooth the waters for contractors on the ground so that everyone is on the same page.

      I will leave it to you to get the answer from the people that sit on the SANS committee to throw their opinion in

      We could then end up with 3 different opinions and outcomes

      Comment

      • Derlyn
        Platinum Member

        • Mar 2019
        • 1747

        #18
        Originally posted by Dave A
        To my mind I tend to apply the hierarchy of nested logic operators (more mathematical and coding oriented, I suppose).

        This would deem 6.16.3.3.2 and 6.16.3.3.3 as separate subset options of the "or" logic operator set by 6.16.3.3.1.
        If the requirements of 6.16.3.3.2 is met fully, the result is TRUE (regardless of the result when tested against 6.16.3.3.3)
        Similarly, if the requirements of 6.16.3.3.3 is met fully, the result is TRUE (regardless of the result when tested against 6.16.3.3.2).
        I agree.

        Comment

        • Dave A
          Site Caretaker

          • May 2006
          • 22803

          #19
          Originally posted by GCE
          Still think the old grey cover for the book was more appropriate than the present black one.


          I'll run it past Cecil.
          Participation is voluntary.

          Alcocks Electrical Services | Alcocks Pest Control & Entomological Services | Alcocks Hygiene Services

          Comment

          Working...