To my mind I tend to apply the hierarchy of nested logic operators (more mathematical and coding oriented, I suppose).
This would deem 6.16.3.3.2 and 6.16.3.3.3 as separate subset options of the "or" logic operator set by 6.16.3.3.1.
If the requirements of 6.16.3.3.2 is met fully, the result is TRUE (regardless of the result when tested against 6.16.3.3.3)
Similarly, if the requirements of 6.16.3.3.3 is met fully, the result is TRUE (regardless of the result when tested against 6.16.3.3.2).
This would deem 6.16.3.3.2 and 6.16.3.3.3 as separate subset options of the "or" logic operator set by 6.16.3.3.1.
If the requirements of 6.16.3.3.2 is met fully, the result is TRUE (regardless of the result when tested against 6.16.3.3.3)
Similarly, if the requirements of 6.16.3.3.3 is met fully, the result is TRUE (regardless of the result when tested against 6.16.3.3.2).
Comment