When billions of dollars are driving a Government protected industry, what are the chances of public interest being of a higher priority than the continuation of the ‘Program” and the profits it makes? Sure, the same old ‘made for public consumption’ Media releases will pay lip service to the concerns raised by ‘stupid and ignorant people’ who question aspects of the industry generated ‘feel good’ reports.

Only when blatant and catastrophic slip-ups occur do the big guns step in and act. Nice word ‘act’, behind the act of investigating is the mad rush to find a scape-goat and/or a reason for transferring blame before the current crises gets too out of hand.

Many such Industries exist in these supposedly enlightened times.
I previously posted this link but as there are warnings about the safety of the site, warnings that could deter some from accessing the site, (nothing wrong with a cautious approach, I’ve taken the liberty of posting the thread in its entirety. Apologies to those who have already accessed this post.
Vaccine Bombshell: Leaked Confidential Document Exposes 36 Infants Dead After This Vaccine


A report to the government noted babies died after receiving a vaccine.
A confidential GlaxoSmithKline document recently leaked to the press exposed that within a two-year period, a total of 36 infants died after receiving the 6-in-1 vaccine, Infanrix Hexa. [1] According to the website Initiative Citoyenne [2] who reported the news, the 1271 page document revealed that GlaxoSmithKline received a total of 1,742 reports of adverse reactions between October 23, 2009, and October 22, 2011, including 503 serious adverse reactions and 36 deaths. Initiative Citoyenne stated:
“It’s not that 14 deaths were recorded by GSK between October 2009 and end in October 2011 as we had originally calculated but 36 (14 from 2010 to 2011 and 22 from 2009 to 2010). In addition to these 36 deaths at least 37 other deaths (sudden death mainly), bringing the total to at least 73 deaths since the launch of the vaccine in 2000, and again, this concerns only the death by sudden death, no further recovery of under-reporting.”
Using the figure of 36 deaths over a two-year period, this averages 1.5 deaths per month, which by anyone’s standard is extremely high. Note that only 1 to 10% of adverse reactions to vaccines are actually reported. Therefore, in reality, the problem could potentially be far more serious and the actual number of fatalities much higher.
THE DEADLY CHEMICAL COCKTAIL
The charts show that many of the babies who died passed away within the first few days of receiving the vaccine. [3] A total of three infants were reported to have died within hours of receiving the vaccine. This tragedy is hardly surprising given the vaccine’s ingredients listed on the GSK Infanrix Hexa product information leaflet, which parents are rarely given the chance to read prior to vaccination, including non-infectious substances from tetanus, diphtheria bacteria, purified proteins of pertussis bacteria, the surface protein of the hepatitis B virus (HBsAg, derived from genetically engineered yeast cells) and inactivated poliovirus. [4] Each 0.5mL dose contains:
• diphtheria toxoid
• tetanus toxoid
• pertussis toxoid
• filamentous haemagglutinin
• pertactin
• recombinant HBsAg protein
• poliovirus Type 1
• poliovirus Type 2
• poliovirus Type 3
• purified capsular polysaccharide of Hib covalently bound to tetanus toxoid
• aluminium hydroxide
• aluminium phosphate
• 2-phenoxyethanol, lactose
• Medium 199
• neomycin
• polymyxin
• polysorbate 80
• polysorbate 20
• sodium chloride
• water
TOXIC DOSES OF TOXIC CHEMICALS
In an interesting article by Dr. Harold Buttram titled “The Ultimate Gamble: Do Childhood Vaccines Result in Genetic Hybridization from Alien Human and Animal DNA Contents?” he highlighted the problems associated with just two of these ingredients, including aluminum, which is a neurotoxin associated with Alzheimer’s disease and seizures, and formaldehyde, which is a known cancer-causing agent commonly used to embalm corpses. [5]
Dr. Harold Buttram also stated:
“It is universally recognized among toxicologists that combinations of toxic chemicals may bring exponential increases in toxicity; that is, two toxic chemicals in combination will bring a ten-fold or even a hundred-fold increase in toxicity.
A classical example of this principle was the Schubert study [21] in which it was found that the amount of lead and the amount of mercury, when each was given separately, would be lethal for one percent of rats tested, would become lethal for one hundred percent of rats tested when combined.
In vaccines this principle would apply at least to mercury and aluminum, both of which are potent neurotoxins.”
CONCLUSION
Considering this information, is it any wonder that babies are dying after receiving vaccinations containing these ingredients? GlaxoSmithKline may try and hide the facts from us but they cannot hide them forever. Infanrix Hexa should be removed from the market immediately.
See more at: http://vactruth.com/2012/12/16/36-in....kjuZbcR3.dpuf

My opinion of observations gleaned from this ‘highly dangerous report’ include,
1) The initial report serves as a form of ‘damage control’ by initially downsizing the extent of the problem in public Media Releases.
2) The argument that “dead or weakened germs cannot make you ill therefore the vaccine is safe” does not take the other toxins in vaccines into account. This completely and utterly destroys what little science is presented in their ‘theory’.
3) The number of times they say ‘at least’ when adjusting totals for Public consumption is cause for concern, it tacitly suggests that there are more casualties hidden from sight. (opinions may differ, even worse is that some will have no opinion of their own) Arguably it is “legalese”;- a term used to refer to ‘defensive or carefully worded text in anticipation of future legal argument or suchlike. Even then it is cause for concern.
4) Some vaccines are made from ingredients that are toxic enough to be a danger to people even if the germs are not taken into consideration.
5) Major Companies, often with government support and protection, and even Special Laws and Special Courts in some cases, to further protect the Companies, are still in the habit of misrepresenting the truth and hiding reports and findings from the public’s eye.
6) Protocol is rarely exercised by the Medical practitioner or Institution when it comes to informing the patient/parent about the benefits vs the dangers of vaccines. Little or no background screening is done in most cases.
I've omitted the source material list for this post, it is available on request.