Mariana, for a potantial defamation suit, you will firstly require such form of infringement of rights; your second hurdle will be the obvious, many individuals on TFSA and rightfully so go by aliases; thirdly, I don't think you've considered the knock off effect of any litigation i.e. investigative journalists begging the public for a new story and last but certainly not least, since the law allows me to defend myself, I will only to be happy to personally engage you. On this pleasant note, I will enter an apperance, my plea will have merits with a counterclaim. Now ordinarily you would rightfully think that you would then by way of pleadings deliver a plea in reconvention. I wouldn't blame you! But not so, you will in effect deliver a replication! Why, simply becuase my counterclaim will have new allegations you which you would then also have a right of reply. You do so to new allegations reaised in a defendants counterclaim via replication. Ideally since the quantum of damages is unliquidated, you sue out combined summons. Believe me you don't want to go this route! Court gives me a high!!!!! Think of it like this for what ever reason you have found yourself in the scam alert forum. Initially you were coming across as defensive but then you did start to explain yourself. I actually saw the human behind you! Don't mess this public opportunity of right of reply up! You can still clarify, simply say, look, I over reacted, I'm also someone who just wants to make it in life. I'm not robbing anyone. My clientele come of their own free will.Kinldy desist from unwarranted threats of litigation!
It can still end well, just show some humanity, show us that you just a typical human being trying to make it??
Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.