Quote Originally Posted by HR Solutions View Post
Well would you hire someone to handle large amounts of money if you were told that he was fired for stealing money - a charge was laid but withdrawn ??

Hearing and knowing this you would presume that a deal was made between the employer and the employee to pay back the money and they would drop the charge. But deep down that little charge is still there.

So back to my question - Would YOU Vanash Naick hire someone to handle money/bank transfers etc if you knew this ??
To be clear, I wouldn't hire an individual who has being convicted of bank robbery to work in a bank! On this note, I will have no reservations whatsoever of hiring a person who has been arrested but never convicted. This person retains his innocent status until a court finds him guilty. Many people are arrested for extremely petty things such aas loitering. I beleive all provinces have this as a by law. Suppose someone attacks you in your property and you shoot that person. regardless of the fact that you acted in self defence, you are still arrested and charged with murder. The only difference is that you have a valid defence. So, if a person looks superficially at just what the pc at the local police station says, then it says, on a certain date you were charged with and arrested for murder.
Does this make my position more clearer?