NWO has SA in its sights. (part 1)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • msmoorad
    Bronze Member

    • Jan 2009
    • 179

    #526
    by the Irish Savant
    (embellished by henrymakow.com)

    Common justice demands Affirmative Action for Jews.

    As every schoolboy know, Jews have been to the forefront of civil rights, diversity and Affirmative Action from Day 1. The ACLU, $PLC and various other Jewish pressure groups have assiduously examined employment statistics and developed complex mathematical formulae to determine each ethnic grouping's appropriate representational level.

    But never for themselves.

    And this of course is entirely attributable to the legendary altruistic, selfless pursuit of the common good that we've come to associate with Jews. They worry themselves sick about justice for blacks, Muslims, lesbians, Hispanics, women but never for themselves.

    Well dammit, if they won't do it for themselves, then I will! And I'm starting it here and now. Common justice demands it. They have waited, mute but hopeful, for long enough. So here's my plan. As for every other minority an examination of Jewish representation will be undertaken at all our enterprises and institutions, and, applying the prevailing formulations, the appropriate Jewish representation level will be calculated.

    As a broad guide for Affirmative Action and diversity purposes, we can assume that in Western countries, they make up 1% of the population. Ok, I know, it's less than that. But let's give them the benefit of the doubt. Oy vey, they've suffered enough already.

    So for example, the US Senate should have at least one Jewish Senator at all times. It's only fair that Jews would have some influence on government.

    And banking too. Every ten years or so, a Jew should be appointed to head up a major bank.

    And here's another helpful suggestion. I understand that the BBC employs about 3,000 staff at Producer or Senior Presenter grade. Are there at least 30 Jews in such positions in the Beeb?

    Our crazy commentator GTRMan, who takes an interest in such things says that about 600 are Jewish, but I don't believe that.

    In any event I think we should find out. And if there are fewer (or in the unlikely event of there being more) the correct quota - as calculated by existing methods - should be applied.

    Let's not stop with the British media. I'd like to see a Jew own a media conglomerate. And some reporters and editors. And a Jewish film producer! And even a few directors and actors! One percent should allow for that.

    Same with academia. Imagine some Jewish college Presidents and professors.

    Jewish friends and colleagues, I'm not looking for your thanks or plaudits. Just like with you, my sense of fair play dictates my actions. And I'm sure we all can look forward to the day when representation fully and accurately reflect the ethnic mix of our communities.

    Agreed?

    --

    Related- David Duke - Jewish Supremecism at |Harvard
    -----------------------------"Thanks Jews!" (YouTube)
    ---------------------------------Liberal Jewish Agenda Behind Affirmative Action

    Makow Comment: The Irish savant forgot to mention other jobs where Jews are underrepresented such as heavy equipment operators, football players, oilfield hands, farmers and construction workers. Where are the affirmative action programs for these crucial areas of employment? The article above is satirical in intent but the point is serious. Although Jews don't know it, Judaism is defined by the Cabala which is satanic in nature. If Jews are influenced by Judaism, should they have so much influence in crucial areas like government, the mass media, law, education and finance? Of course this influence now has spread to a whole ruling class of gentile shills, whose success is predicated on acquiescence.

    - See more at: http://henrymakow.com/#sthash.5Vu6oonh.dpuf
    A “conspiracy theory” no longer means an event explained by a conspiracy. Instead, it now means any explanation, or even a fact, that is out of step with the government’s explanation and that of its media pimps.

    Comment

    • Trickzta
      Email problem

      • Feb 2013
      • 462

      #527
      The Middle Ages never happened

      What’s not a secret is that, at some point prior to the 16th century, we all got a bit muddled up with our timings. The problem was our dates were falling out of sync with the astronomical cycles. Since around 45BC, we’d been using the simplistic Julian calendar, which gave us a leap year every four years. By the time we switched to the slightly more complex but superior Gregorian calendar, in 1582, it was reckoned we had “lost” around 10 days. That drift was corrected – we jumped from October 4 to October 15 – and we carried on anew. But if you do the maths, something strange will become apparent.

      You’ll see that it would have taken 1,257 years for us to accumulate those 10 days of error. And if you subtract those 1,257 years from the year in which we changed to the new calendar, you’ll find yourself not in 45BC, when we began using the old calendar and the drifting began, but AD 325. We have, it seems, lost more than three centuries.

      Researchers such as German scholars Heribert Illig and Dr Hans-Ulrich Niemitz believe it’s not 2014, right now, but 1717. Postulating a complex conspiracy between Byzantine Emperor Constantine VII and his relative Holy Roman Emperor Otto III, who they say wanted the records to falsely show that he was reigning at the symbolic fall of the first millennium, they’ve concluded that the Middle Ages never happened. After all, wouldn’t this explain why, following the fall of the Roman Empire, nobody in the west really did anything? For 300 years, there weren’t really any wars or works of literature or technological advances. Were we asleep? Stoned? Tying our shoelaces? Or were the Dark Ages dark because they didn’t actually exist?

      Critics of what’s known as the “phantom time hypothesis” claim the theory’s grand error is that the correction, back in 1582, wasn’t actually for the purposes of correcting for 10 days. Rather, the intention was to put Easter back in the right place. It was the Council of Nicea that originally decided where Easter should be and its position was set in 325BC – which, boringly, means the maths add up.

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/b...-theories.html
      If the outcome of a vote is unknown then voting is tantamount to gambling. If the outcome of a vote is known, then voting is futile. Robert Rorschach.

      Comment

      • Trickzta
        Email problem

        • Feb 2013
        • 462

        #528
        Propaganda

        In this war, as in so many others, propagandists churned out a stream of malicious lies to generate popular backing for the aggression and killing. British newspapers, churchmen and war correspondents invented hundreds of fake atrocity stories that portrayed the Boers as treacherous and arrogant brutes. These included numerous shocking claims alleging that Boer soldiers massacred pro-British civilians, that Boer civilians murdered British soldiers, and that Boers executed fellow-Boers who wanted to surrender. "There was virtually no limit to such invention," historian Phillip Knightley has noted.

        A widely shown newsreel film purported to show Boers attacking a Red Cross tent while British doctors and nurses treat the wounded. Actually this fake had been shot with actors on Hampstead Heath, a suburb of London.

        The Boer War Remembered By Mark Weber The Anglo-Boer War of 1899-1902 was more than the first major military clash of the 20th century. Pitting as it did the might of the globe-girdling British Empire, backed by international finance, against a small pioneering nation of independent-minded farmers, ranchers and merchants in southern Africa who lived by the Bible and the rifle, its legacy...
        If the outcome of a vote is unknown then voting is tantamount to gambling. If the outcome of a vote is known, then voting is futile. Robert Rorschach.

        Comment

        • Citizen X
          Diamond Member

          • Sep 2011
          • 3411

          #529
          Originally posted by Trickzta
          Propaganda

          In this war, as in so many others, propagandists churned out a stream of malicious lies to generate popular backing for the aggression and killing. British newspapers, churchmen and war correspondents invented hundreds of fake atrocity stories that portrayed the Boers as treacherous and arrogant brutes. These included numerous shocking claims alleging that Boer soldiers massacred pro-British civilians, that Boer civilians murdered British soldiers, and that Boers executed fellow-Boers who wanted to surrender.
          Hi Trickzta,

          It's been some time since we spoke. Suffice to say it, there is truth in the foregoing. The Boers suffered terrible atrocities during the Anglo-Boer war.

          My concern though is that you jumping from one topic to the next under the heading of 'NWO has it's sights on SA,' answer me this: What does your last posts have to with the thread title?
          “Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." Winston Churchill
          Spelling mistakes and/or typographical errors I found in leading publications.
          Click here
          "Without prejudice and all rights reserved"

          Comment

          • msmoorad
            Bronze Member

            • Jan 2009
            • 179

            #530
            Cecil john Rhodes was an agent of the Crown who instigated the wars to enable the British/Oppenheimers/Rothschilds to get control of the gold in SA
            this was the root cause of the Anglo Boer wars.
            A “conspiracy theory” no longer means an event explained by a conspiracy. Instead, it now means any explanation, or even a fact, that is out of step with the government’s explanation and that of its media pimps.

            Comment

            • Citizen X
              Diamond Member

              • Sep 2011
              • 3411

              #531
              Originally posted by msmoorad
              Cecil john Rhodes was an agent of the Crown who instigated the wars to enable the British/Oppenheimers/Rothschilds to get control of the gold in SA
              this was the root cause of the Anglo Boer wars.
              Morning MS,

              There is some historical truth in what you say.
              One must remember that there were two Anglo Boer wars. Rhodes did promote the British cause but it was more a case of British imperialism. It does hold true that both the gold and diamonds of SA was key on the British agenda. The further truth is that the British Empire was expanding their domain during this time in Africa.

              But again, what does this have to do with the title thread i.e 'NWO has it's sights on SA.'

              This thread is going all over the place and covering a range of issues, incidents and events that are unrelated. I can't see any nexus between both Anglo Boer wars and the so called 'NWO.'

              That being said, one can't deny that this thread has attracted much interest. For reasons beyond me, it seems that more than 150 000 people are interested in the NWO.

              So Trickzta's thread has generated a great deal of interest.
              “Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." Winston Churchill
              Spelling mistakes and/or typographical errors I found in leading publications.
              Click here
              "Without prejudice and all rights reserved"

              Comment

              • HR Solutions
                Suspended

                • Mar 2013
                • 3358

                #532
                This thread is going all over the place and covering a range of issues, incidents and events that are unrelated. I can't see any nexus between both Anglo Boer wars and the so called 'NWO.'
                That is exactly what happens when you just copy and paste (without even reading it in some cases) instead of writing your own educated opinions based on what you think might be factual !

                Comment

                • Dave A
                  Site Caretaker

                  • May 2006
                  • 22807

                  #533
                  It may be off-topic with the thread title, but this post gives a truly brilliant insight into the problem -

                  Originally posted by Trickzta
                  The Middle Ages never happened
                  What a punchline!

                  Originally posted by Trickzta
                  Critics of what’s known as the “phantom time hypothesis” claim the theory’s grand error is that the correction, back in 1582, wasn’t actually for the purposes of correcting for 10 days. Rather, the intention was to put Easter back in the right place. It was the Council of Nicea that originally decided where Easter should be and its position was set in 325BC – which, boringly, means the maths add up.
                  Participation is voluntary.

                  Alcocks Electrical Services | Alcocks Pest Control & Entomological Services | Alcocks Hygiene Services

                  Comment

                  • Citizen X
                    Diamond Member

                    • Sep 2011
                    • 3411

                    #534
                    Originally posted by Dave A
                    It may be off-topic with the thread title, but this post gives a truly brilliant insight into the problem -


                    What a punchline!
                    Originally posted by Trickzta
                    Critics of what’s known as the “phantom time hypothesis” claim the theory’s grand error is that the correction, back in 1582, wasn’t actually for the purposes of correcting for 10 days. Rather, the intention was to put Easter back in the right place. It was the Council of Nicea that originally decided where Easter should be and its position was set in 325BC – which, boringly, means the maths add up
                    I think Trickzta got the date of the council of Nicea incorrect, in fact I know! It was AD 325 and not 325BC. A great many things took place at that council, hence my thread 'the case against Christian Public Holidays,' 'but I'm just being picky,'Imported the last line from a philosophical lady
                    “Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." Winston Churchill
                    Spelling mistakes and/or typographical errors I found in leading publications.
                    Click here
                    "Without prejudice and all rights reserved"

                    Comment

                    • Trickzta
                      Email problem

                      • Feb 2013
                      • 462

                      #535
                      Originally posted by Citizen X
                      Hi Trickzta,

                      It's been some time since we spoke. Suffice to say it, there is truth in the foregoing. The Boers suffered terrible atrocities during the Anglo-Boer war.

                      My concern though is that you jumping from one topic to the next under the heading of 'NWO has it's sights on SA,' answer me this: What does your last posts have to with the thread title?
                      Good question, it’s a long story but I’ll keep it as short as I can.

                      Cecil John Rhodes was an Agent of the ‘City of London” bankers, the ‘Red Shields’ known as the Rothschilds are the Banking Elite’s Leaders and even the Queen pays homage to them.

                      The Bankers paid Rhodes and financed the acquisition of gold and diamond mines in his quest to gain a monopoly on these valuable minerals. Rhodes was a fanatical Empire builder and used the military to take Zimbabwe by force, despite having made a promise not to do so. Albert Beit played a role in this theft and double cross.

                      Rhodes became the only living man to have a country named after him. The myths and legends of ancient gold mines in Zimbabwe is what drove Rhodes to claim Zimbabwe for Britain‘s Empire. He had ambitions to colonise the whole African continent.

                      I’m writing from memory so the timeline may not be accurate but the events are well documented.

                      Rhodes introduced fenced in compounds for the cheap labourers as well as a ‘pass’ system for those ‘natives’on the streets of Kimberly after curfew. Hendrik Vervoerd later adopted these measures and wrote them into law.

                      The goldfields of the Witwatersrand proved too big a bone to chew and Rhodes could not gain a majority or monopoly as he had in Kimberly’s diamond rush, something he achieved through deceit, cunning and greed. His partner in crime the rogue Barney Barnato was instrumental in his achieving this monopoly.

                      Barney disappeared overboard from a ship on which Rhodes and Barney were sailing to England on. Convenient for Rhodes to say the least.

                      President Kruger had sent a proposal to the Queen and the Prime Minister of England in which he made concessions to England and also some requests that would avert military confrontation between the two countries.

                      The Queen and the Parliament accepted Krugers terms, stating that they were generous and ample and fully accepted the offer. A letter to this effect was sent to Lord Milner in the Cape. Rhodes and Milner ignored this letter and kept it secret while they plotted for war. Obviously the ‘City of London’ wanted war as there was no other way to seize the gold mines under the Kruger proposals that the Queen endorsed.

                      By planning and executing the Jameson raid fiasco they literally forced England into a war she neither started nor wanted.

                      The monopoly of the diamond mines led to one of the biggest conspiracies in the world. By hoarding the bulk of the diamonds and controlling their release they were able to sell the diamonds at a price many fold their value. A stone costing $20 could retail for a $1000 or more.

                      De Beers would go to any lengths to maintain this artificial value for these little stones. They made a deal with Russia to buy and distribute their diamonds and prevented the Russians from flooding the market and dropping the value of diamonds.

                      De Beers is suspected of sabotaging an American diamond mining operation after they refused to sell the mine to the monopoly. The mining operation has never been able to mine diamonds since.

                      What we see here is the price fixing for diamonds in the hands of the few. The ‘City of London’ would eventually decide on the price of gold, platinum and other metals as well as controlling the release of diamonds to keep the price inflated.

                      These practices were very profitable to the Bankers and was instrumental in keeping the countries who were rich in minerals in perpetual debt with only a few corrupt officials in those countries being enriched. It ensured that the minerals would be mined by using cheap labour and paid for at prices well below their worth. For example, some modern day Financial experts say gold, had its price been market related instead of decided by a few people would be sold at $6000.00 per fine ounce.

                      The World Order was stealing the wealth of mineral rich nations and giving little in return. The working conditions in the mines left many people with diseases of the lungs and possibly other ailments too. Little has been done to compensate these workers.

                      With Oppenheimer selling his 40% shares in de Beers to Anglo-American in which he had shares and with Anglo-American selling its gold shares they weave a web that entangles any legal action for compensation and makes it difficult to bring the Giant Mining Houses to account.

                      Rhodes was the shaker that enabled the ‘City of London’ aka the Masters of world affairs and the so-called ‘shadow’ governments that are the power behind the Governments of many, many countries in our present day world, to be in the situation they find themselves in today.

                      The ‘City of London’ is still in the business of instigating wars and their outcome, causing stocks and bonds to be manipulated, stealing the mineral wealth of Nations that have people starving despite their wealth, and a whole lot more.

                      Rhodes founded the ‘Round Table’ organisation that serves the Bankers and their objectives till this day. He also started a scholarship for promising young people to groom for future positions that would be beneficial to the Bankers and their goals.

                      Rhodes was effectively the first of the Elite to bring South Africa to heel. Everything he did was for the Banker’s Empire first, the Queen second and everyone else, last if at all.

                      Please feel free to ask for more detail, for sources or any other questions you might have. I’ll be posting some ‘cut and paste’ articles to add some meat to the bones in this post.
                      Last edited by Dave A; 16-Jul-25, 04:11 PM.
                      If the outcome of a vote is unknown then voting is tantamount to gambling. If the outcome of a vote is known, then voting is futile. Robert Rorschach.

                      Comment

                      • Trickzta
                        Email problem

                        • Feb 2013
                        • 462

                        #536
                        Originally posted by Citizen X
                        I think Trickzta got the date of the council of Nicea incorrect, in fact I know! It was AD 325 and not 325BC. A great many things took place at that council, hence my thread 'the case against Christian Public Holidays,' 'but I'm just being picky,'Imported the last line from a philosophical lady
                        Yup, guilty as charged. Or as a lecturer would say "I'm just checking if you're listening (reading in this case). Well spotted.
                        Last edited by Dave A; 16-Jul-25, 04:12 PM.
                        If the outcome of a vote is unknown then voting is tantamount to gambling. If the outcome of a vote is known, then voting is futile. Robert Rorschach.

                        Comment

                        • Trickzta
                          Email problem

                          • Feb 2013
                          • 462

                          #537
                          Originally posted by HR Solutions
                          That is exactly what happens when you just copy and paste (without even reading it in some cases) instead of writing your own educated opinions based on what you think might be factual !
                          You know which cut and pastes I read and which I don't? Which post was the last one I never even read? Or any post I've not read will be acceptable. If possible let us know how you know this to be true or how you came to this conclusion. Thanks.
                          If the outcome of a vote is unknown then voting is tantamount to gambling. If the outcome of a vote is known, then voting is futile. Robert Rorschach.

                          Comment

                          • HR Solutions
                            Suspended

                            • Mar 2013
                            • 3358

                            #538
                            If possible let us know how you know this to be true or how you came to this conclusion.
                            Plagiarism checks are a wonderful application.

                            Comment

                            • Citizen X
                              Diamond Member

                              • Sep 2011
                              • 3411

                              #539
                              Originally posted by Trickzta
                              Good question, it’s a long story but I’ll keep it as short as I can.

                              Cecil John Rhodes was an Agent of the ‘City of London” bankers, the ‘Red Shields’ known as the Rothschilds are the Banking Elite’s Leaders and even the Queen pays homage to them.

                              The Bankers paid Rhodes and financed the acquisition of gold and diamond mines in his quest to gain a monopoly on these valuable minerals. Rhodes was a fanatical Empire builder and used the military to take Zimbabwe by force, despite having made a promise not to do so. Albert Beit played a role in this theft and double cross.

                              Rhodes became the only living man to have a country named after him. The myths and legends of ancient gold mines in Zimbabwe is what drove Rhodes to claim Zimbabwe for Britain‘s Empire. He had ambitions to colonise the whole African continent.

                              I’m writing from memory so the timeline may not be accurate but the events are well documented.

                              Rhodes introduced fenced in compounds for the cheap labourers as well as a ‘pass’ system for those ‘natives’on the streets of Kimberly after curfew. Hendrik Vervoerd later adopted these measures and wrote them into law.

                              The goldfields of the Witwatersrand proved too big a bone to chew and Rhodes could not gain a majority or monopoly as he had in Kimberly’s diamond rush, something he achieved through deceit, cunning and greed. His partner in crime the rogue Barney Barnato was instrumental in his achieving this monopoly.

                              Barney disappeared overboard from a ship on which Rhodes and Barney were sailing to England on. Convenient for Rhodes to say the least.

                              President Kruger had sent a proposal to the Queen and the Prime Minister of England in which he made concessions to England and also some requests that would avert military confrontation between the two countries.

                              The Queen and the Parliament accepted Krugers terms, stating that they were generous and ample and fully accepted the offer. A letter to this effect was sent to Lord Milner in the Cape. Rhodes and Milner ignored this letter and kept it secret while they plotted for war. Obviously the ‘City of London’ wanted war as there was no other way to seize the gold mines under the Kruger proposals that the Queen endorsed.

                              By planning and executing the Jameson raid fiasco they literally forced England into a war she neither started nor wanted.

                              The monopoly of the diamond mines led to one of the biggest conspiracies in the world. By hoarding the bulk of the diamonds and controlling their release they were able to sell the diamonds at a price many fold their value. A stone costing $20 could retail for a $1000 or more.

                              De Beers would go to any lengths to maintain this artificial value for these little stones. They made a deal with Russia to buy and distribute their diamonds and prevented the Russians from flooding the market and dropping the value of diamonds.

                              De Beers is suspected of sabotaging an American diamond mining operation after they refused to sell the mine to the monopoly. The mining operation has never been able to mine diamonds since.

                              What we see here is the price fixing for diamonds in the hands of the few. The ‘City of London’ would eventually decide on the price of gold, platinum and other metals as well as controlling the release of diamonds to keep the price inflated.

                              These practices were very profitable to the Bankers and was instrumental in keeping the countries who were rich in minerals in perpetual debt with only a few corrupt officials in those countries being enriched. It ensured that the minerals would be mined by using cheap labour and paid for at prices well below their worth. For example, some modern day Financial experts say gold, had its price been market related instead of decided by a few people would be sold at $6000.00 per fine ounce.

                              The World Order was stealing the wealth of mineral rich nations and giving little in return. The working conditions in the mines left many people with diseases of the lungs and possibly other ailments too. Little has been done to compensate these workers.

                              With Oppenheimer selling his 40% shares in de Beers to Anglo-American in which he had shares and with Anglo-American selling its gold shares they weave a web that entangles any legal action for compensation and makes it difficult to bring the Giant Mining Houses to account.

                              Rhodes was the shaker that enabled the ‘City of London’ aka the Masters of world affairs and the so-called ‘shadow’ governments that are the power behind the Governments of many, many countries in our present day world, to be in the situation they find themselves in today.

                              The ‘City of London’ is still in the business of instigating wars and their outcome, causing stocks and bonds to be manipulated, stealing the mineral wealth of Nations that have people starving despite their wealth, and a whole lot more.

                              Rhodes founded the ‘Round Table’ organisation that serves the Bankers and their objectives till this day. He also started a scholarship for promising young people to groom for future positions that would be beneficial to the Bankers and their goals.

                              Rhodes was effectively the first of the Elite to bring South Africa to heel. Everything he did was for the Banker’s Empire first, the Queen second and everyone else, last if at all.

                              Please feel free to ask for more detail, for sources or any other questions you might have. I’ll be posting some ‘cut and paste’ articles to add some meat to the bones in this post.
                              This post is excellent Trickzta!

                              You actually thought about the presentation and even made paragraphs. This is something someone can read. I'm not saying saying that I agree with the content but rather that it's well presented.

                              Cecil John Rhodes may have played a part but British Imperialism of that day was the main driving force.

                              Originally posted by Trickzta
                              The World Order was stealing the wealth of mineral rich nations and giving little in return.
                              Are you essentially saying that Britain( a country with legal personality), the state, not it's citizens, but it's decision makers are part of this so called NWO?

                              Trickzta, your thread has attracted great attention from the amount of people that viewed your thread, that said, why not just stick with this NWO and nothing further on this thread, alternatively create another thread for other issues, topics, matters etc

                              Trickzta, I do have my own views on the New World Order, unfortunately they have religious overtures which is unsuitable for a forum of this stature. I have therefore decided not to express them.
                              Last edited by Dave A; 16-Jul-25, 04:12 PM.
                              “Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." Winston Churchill
                              Spelling mistakes and/or typographical errors I found in leading publications.
                              Click here
                              "Without prejudice and all rights reserved"

                              Comment

                              • HR Solutions
                                Suspended

                                • Mar 2013
                                • 3358

                                #540
                                Lol @ Citizen X


                                Plagiarism Check
                                6 matches from http://www.infowars.com/study-conspi...crazy-hostile/
                                In short the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory accurately describes the people who defend the official account of not those who dispute it
                                6 matches from http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-...e-2453052.html
                                In short the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory accurately describes the people who defend the official account of not those who dispute it
                                6 matches from http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative...e-2711552.html
                                In short the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory accurately describes the people who defend the official account of not those who dispute it
                                6 matches from http://www.lewrockwell.com/2013/07/k...falling-apart/
                                In short the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory accurately describes the people who defend the official account of not those who dispute it
                                6 matches from http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/07...vs-govt-dupes/
                                In short the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory accurately describes the people who defend the official account of not those who dispute it
                                6 matches from http://www.pakalertpress.com/2013/07...crazy-hostile/
                                In short the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory accurately describes the people who defend the official account of not those who dispute it
                                5 matches from http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative...t-2711588.html
                                In short the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory accurately describes the people who defend the official account of not those who dispute it
                                5 matches from http://www.democraticunderground.com/11356666
                                In short the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory accurately describes the people who defend the official account of not those who dispute it
                                4 matches from http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative...2-3049336.html
                                ... Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes those labeled conspiracy theorists appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events
                                4 matches from http://www.infowars.com/government-c...falling-apart/
                                ... Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes those labeled conspiracy theorists appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events
                                4 matches from http://www.democraticunderground.com...02&pid=5646149
                                A social psychological study of online discussion of conspiracy theories the study compared conspiracist pro-conspiracy theory and conventionalist anti-conspiracy comments at news websites
                                4 matches from http://chemtrailsplanet.net/2014/02/...-than-sheeple/
                                ... Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes those labeled conspiracy theorists appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events
                                3 matches from http://www.realistnews.net/Thread-ne...nt-dupes-crazy
                                A social psychological study of online discussion of conspiracy theories the study compared conspiracist pro-conspiracy theory and conventionalist anti-conspiracy comments at news websites
                                3 matches from http://themindunleashed.org/2014/10/...ists-sane.html
                                In short the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory accurately describes the people who defend the official account of not those who dispute it
                                2 matches from http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative...2-3044674.html
                                Douglas of the University of Kent
                                1 matches from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23847577
                                A social psychological study of online discussion of conspiracy theories
                                1 matches from http://purple-elephant-uk.blogspot.c...onspiracy.html
                                ... negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory accurately describes the people who defend the official account of not those who dispute it


                                Results source search
                                First search finished.
                                Relevance 23: www.infowars.com

                                https://www.infowars.com/study-consp...theorists-sane...

                                Relevance 19: beforeitsnews.com
                                beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theories/2013/07/cia...
                                beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/10/new-studies...
                                beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/10/scientific-study...
                                beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/07/shields-are-down...
                                beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/07/government-cover...

                                Relevance 12: www.lewrockwell.com
                                https://www.lewrockwell.com/2013/07/...ett/government...

                                Relevance 8: www.democraticunderground.com
                                https://www.democraticunderground.co...st&forum=1002&...


                                Relevance 8: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
                                Recent research into the psychology of conspiracy belief has highlighted the importance of belief systems in the acceptance or rejection of conspiracy theories. We examined a large sample of conspiracist (pro-conspiracy-theory) and conventionalist (anti-conspiracy-theory) comments on news websites i …

                                As our field seeks to elucidate the biopsychosocial etiologies of mental health disorders, many traditional psychological and social science researchers have added, or plan to add, genetic components to their programs of research. An understanding of the history, methods, and perspectives of the psy …


                                Relevance 7: www.realistnews.net
                                https://www.realistnews.net/Thread-n...ity-of-kent-uk...

                                Relevance 7: chemtrailsplanet.net
                                chemtrailsplanet.net/2014/02/...conspiracy-theorists-more...

                                Relevance 6: www.presstv.ir


                                Relevance 3: www.pakalertpress.com


                                Relevance 3: purple-elephant-uk.blogspot.com
                                purple-elephant-uk.blogspot.com/2014/08/the-negative...

                                Relevance 3: themindunleashed.org
                                themindunleashed.org/2014/10/scientific-study-reveals...

                                Relevance 3: www.wnd.com
                                https://www.wnd.com/2013/10/are-cons...sts-really-the...
                                Last edited by Dave A; 16-Jul-25, 04:13 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...