Quote Originally Posted by Dave A View Post
There is the significant matter of this claim in the OP that needed addressing:


The impression created is that ACMGOLD unreasonably skipped with the funds.

In my view, the OP brought the matter into the public domain for judgement, and has made certain untested statements. Only fair that the "jury" picked by the plaintiff gets to see the evidence of the defendant too
I agree it works both ways.