About 43% of members believe that they will have enough to retire on, while fund trustees believe that figure is closer to 26% and the reality is that only 6% of people will retire comfortably.
And I can virtually guarantee that the 6% did not rely on pension funds to achieve that position.
If trustees believe that only 26% of their members have adequate retirement cover, shouldn't it be their duty to inform the members of this? What members do with this information is then the members' responsibility.
Like get their money out of the financial managers' sticky paws and invest it in something worthwhile directly themselves? Right - like pension fund managers are going to let that happen

Or bargaining councils, trade unions...