Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: M Mdladlana on labour brokers campaign

  1. #1
    Administrator I Robot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts

    M Mdladlana on labour brokers campaign

    Minister to accelerate campaign on labour brokers

    5 August 2009

    Labour Minister Membathisi Mdladlana says the exploitation of workers by labour brokers may soon be a thing of the past as plans are afoot to review the laws that regulate labour brokers. This follows a research commissioned by the Department of Labour which indicates that employees engaged through brokers are, among others, paid significantly less than those that are directly hired by employers though they perform the same work.

    Reacting earlier this year to the findings of the research, Mdladlana described labour broking as "form of human trafficking (not necessarily in itself an act of human trafficking)" saying the practice was selling the labour of workers to the highest bidder.

    "It is an extreme form of free market capitalism which reduces workers to commodities that can be traded for profit as if they were meat or vegetables. The agenda of labour brokers is pro-employer and anti-trade unionism. Labour brokers are anti-union because they constantly move workers around from one place to another often with no access to union officials, with no possibility of stop order deduction for union subscriptions."

    Announcing his latest plans today, Mdladlana said in a statement the move was aimed at ensuring that employees hired through labour brokers enjoy the same rights and protection as any other workers.

    "Our labour laws need to be re-evaluated to ascertain the extent to which they provide employees with decent work, in line with the national strategic objectives" he said.

    The laws that are likely to be amended to regulate labour brokers are the Basic Conditions of Employment Act of 1997, the Employment Equity Act of 1998 and the Labour Relations Act of 1995. The matter is currently being tabled at National Economic Development and Labour Council (Nedlac) for consideration by the social partnership of government, employers and organised labour.

    Last edited by Dave A; 06-Aug-09 at 07:23 PM.

  2. #2
    Moderator IanF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Thanked 526 Times in 402 Posts
    Now why are customer service levels down, employee attitudes working to rule or most time on go slow.
    Because the labour laws protect the inept by concentrating not on work ethic but rather have the correct procedures been followed. Anyone want to place a bet on whether the unemployment rate will decline when this goes through?
    Only stress when you can change the outcome!

  3. #3
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Durban, South Africa
    Thanked 2,585 Times in 2,180 Posts
    Blog Entries
    I believe what has made labour brokers the "employment" route of choice for so many companies is the LRA itself!

    In drafting the LRA, the focus was on protecting employees rather than protecting employment. Government might not agree with that observation, but you just need to look at the result to see the truth of it.

    The difference between the two might seem subtle, but in reality it is huge. When you focus on employment, you have to take a moment to recognise where employment comes from every time you want to do something.

    If you just focus on employees, the effect of your decisions on employers doesn't carry quite the same importance.

Similar Threads

  1. M Mdladlana: Annual Labour Law Conference
    By I Robot in forum General Regulatory Compliance Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 18-Jul-08, 02:42 PM

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts