What are the implications of allocating a payment in one cash book to another cash book as a contra (instead of using a transfer account)?
What are the implications of allocating a payment in one cash book to another cash book as a contra (instead of using a transfer account)?
Hi Louisa, Something that I find works best is:
Set up another bank account for example "Transferring Account" .
1. First Account - example 8410/000
If this account transfers money to 8420 then allocate it to the Transferring Account - example 8430
2. Second Account - example 8420/000
This account will then receive that money from 8410. Also allocate this to 8430
You will then see a credit from first account in 8430 and a debit from second account in 8410 - therefore the two contra each other out.
The only reason why I stopped doing the transfers directly to another account is because it is easy to forget which account you used to do the transfer - the cash book print out also won't show the "receipt" in the second account. you will only see it in the ledger detail.
Having a transferring account really helps to reconcile each month if there are a lot of transfers to and from bank accounts. It should effectively always be zero.
Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.