Had to delete a lot o stuff... LOL

Ask yourself these questions;

> Why isn't the FULL news reported?
> Why are some interviews aggressive and one-sided? [How meany times have we seen the news group attempted to make the news?]
> Why do some parliament members enjoy a greater freedom of expression then others?

Upon asking these questions you start to see why the "comments" section got removed. It is no secret that that you "like me" get more news via SMS and e-mail then from the news groups. It is not a secret that "some news groups" are very selective on the news they report. And if you start to consider the options available why couldn't a moderator be appointed to make sure that Trolls and haters be removed?

Then you realize this isn't about the trolls or the haters or the fact that they didn't implement a moderator system. What did they do? Did they remove public opinion?

That is a interesting question isn't it?

A more troubling question would then be;
Why was it needed to remove public option?
Could it be that the public started to point out that the news groups where selective?

Wow so many questions that can be asked... Not many answers...

In the end the news network will become a thing of the past. Why because firstly some now demand you do subscriptions and if you consider that a newspaper is cheap inexpensive and doesn't require data or power it is surly better then having some application on your tablet eating away at your data and wallet. Yes it might be "easy" to read news on your tablet or phone... But it is not worth it at all... Long live newspapers