
Originally Posted by
ArcSine
The differences can be attributed to the risk perceptions in the eyes of the originators / banks. For example, conventional wisdom has it that if a business owner gets into financial difficulties, he'll redirect all his efforts and remaining resources toward saving his residence, and allow his commercial property to be sacrificed to the repossession gremlins, if it comes to that.
Similarly, a residential mortgage is often supported primarily by the owner's "every Friday" paycheck (and frequently a spouse's, to boot), whereas a commercial loan's first line of support is the net cash flow of a business. The latter is, of course, usually significantly more unpredictable than the former. Businesses go bust on a regular basis, but families tend to be around for the long haul.
Also there's a much more robust secondary market for residential paper. This means a bank will frequently only have its money tied up in a 30-year mortgage for a very short time, whereas for a 15-year commercial note, the bank's at risk the full 15 years (albeit on a declining absolute amount of exposure, of course).
None of which makes your frustration any less annoying, I'm sure. Hopefully someone familiar with funding and financing programs in your particular area will weigh in with some attractive alternatives.
Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.