NWO has SA in its sights. (part 1)

[Trickzta]

Talk of NWO makes me laugh.

My advice and humble opinion, as in the old days, don't believe everything you read, and in this day and age, don't believe everything you watch on you-tube.

New studies: ‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane; government dupes crazy, hostile

Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.

The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.

In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist – a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory – accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

No wonder the anti-conspiracy people are sounding more and more like a bunch of hostile, paranoid cranks

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/07/14/whatabout7/

[Trickzta]

CIA, Mossad have been dabbling in mind control for decades
• Secret U.S. documents reveal infatuation with “brainwashing”
- See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=1361....gdC0hdJ7.dpuf

[Trickzta]

"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise their power from behind the scenes." Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court.

"We shall have World Government, whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent." - James Warburg, founder of the Council on Foreign Relations

"It is necessary to establish a universal regime and empire over the whole world ...." Adam Weishaupt founder of the Bavarian Illuminati.

The six goals for a one world order.
Goal #1 : The establishment of international economic order (cashless society)

Goal #2: The establishment of a one-world government

Goal #3 : The conquest and subjugation of two super powers (USA and USSR)

Goal #4: The ascension of the United States of Europe as the dominant nation in a Confederated one-world government

Goal #5: The ushering in of a supreme world leader to preside over the new unified one-world government

Goal #6 : The establishment of a one-world religion which will coordinate all the world’s religions, cults, faith groups and spiritual beliefs under the guidance of Supreme Pontiff

The method by which these are going to be brought about will most likely be either a manufactured GLOBAL ECONOMIC DEPRESSION, THIRD WORLD WAR, or MAYBE BOTH. It has been said that Albert Pike or the Freemasons have established a plan long ago that calls for Three Major World Wars that they will use to bring about their Masonic goal of a NEW WORLD ORDER.

http://thecomingnewworldorder.blogspot.com/

[Trickzta]

More USA troops die from suicide than in combat.

Washington’s new law essentially mirrors Oregon’s, but there’s one important difference. In Oregon, a physician will write on the death certificate that the actual cause of a patient’s death was through the Death with Dignity Act if that’s the case. That won’t be allowed in Washington where a provision in the law mandates that the physician “shall list the underlying terminal disease as the cause of death.”

http://www.newswithviews.com/NWV-News/news109.htm

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have investigated the association between religion and suicide either in terms of Durkheim's social integration hypothesis or the hypothesis of the regulative benefits of religion. The relationship between religion and suicide attempts has received even less attention.

http://www.adherents.com/misc/religion_suicide.html

Assisted dying is a form of palliative care (end of life care) where a doctor gives medication, or withdraws medication, in a way that purposefully brings about the death of a terminally ill patient. Switzerland's Dignitas is one place where people can go to find a final peace, and over 1,000 people have done so there, many from Germany and also some from the UK. In 2000, assisted suicide was also legal in Colombia, Belgium and the Netherlands but is illegal almost everywhere else1. This is generally done by request of the patient, or if comatose, by request of their closest relatives. Assisted suicide is a form of suicide where a doctor first gives the patient the lethal medication for the patient to take themselves or, where the patient needs help in physically committing suicide if they can't do it themselves. This page argues for the careful de-criminalisation of both forms, and making it near-universally available.

http://www.humantruth.info/assisted_suicide.html

The Belgian case was exceptional because the twins were not terminally ill. Belgium allows physician-assisted suicide when the patient declares it to be his or her wish and doctors confirm that the patient is in unbearable physical or psychological pain. The first doctors the twins approached refused the case; eventually, the deaf twins successfully argued that being unable to communicate with each other constituted unbearable psychological pain.

http://news.discovery.com/human/life/could-assisted-suicide-be-legal-across-us-130117.htm

Belgium Twin Brothers Die by Euthanasia -- Assisted Suicide Should Be Legal in America

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-siebold/belgium-twins-euthanasia-_b_2481227.html

The only four places that today openly and legally, authorize active assistance in dying of patients, are:
1. Oregon (since l997, physician-assisted suicide only);
2. Switzerland (1941, physician and non-physician assisted suicide only);
3. Belgium (2002, permits 'euthanasia' but does not define the method;
4. Netherlands (voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide lawful since April 2002 but permitted by the courts since l984).

http://www.assistedsuicide.org/suicide_laws.html

[Trickzta]

Something else to laugh about?
PEARL HARBOR

MOTHER OF ALL CONSPIRACIES
1940 - FDR ordered the fleet transferred from the West Coast to its exposed position in Hawaii and ordered the fleet remain stationed at Pearl Harbor over complaints by its commander Admiral Richardson that there was inadequate protection from air attack and no protection from torpedo attack. Richardson felt so strongly that he twice disobeyed orders to berth his fleet there and he raised the issue personally with FDR in October and he was soon after replaced. His successor, Admiral Kimmel, also brought up the same issues with FDR in June 1941.
7 Oct 1940 - Navy IQ analyst McCollum wrote an 8 point memo on how to force Japan into war with US. Beginning the next day FDR began to put them into effect and all 8 were eventually accomplished.

http://thenwwrdor.blogspot.com/2012/08/pearl-harbor-mother-of-all-conspiracies.html#.UqsEqCe2rXQ

[pmbguy]

New studies: ‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane; government dupes crazy, hostile

Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.

The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.

In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist – a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory – accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

No wonder the anti-conspiracy people are sounding more and more like a bunch of hostile, paranoid cranks
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/07/14/whatabout7/

You know what... my maid (God bless her soul) is completely stable and sane, more sane than I am. Anyway so one day I was watching this documentary on dinosaurs, raptors in particular. She was busy sweeping and I said “Maria, what is that?” pointing at the tv....she looked for a while and said “Ostrich” then calmly carried on sweeping. Now her sanity did not determine whether her grasp of what she was seeing was correct.

So let’s apply this to you and I. You may be saner than I am, just like my maid. You see the world and conclude that the NWO is real “Ostrich” I see the world and determine it’s the way it’s always been “Utah Raptor”. My intelligence and education lead me to believe it’s a Raptor and your intelligence and education leads you to believe it’s an Ostrich.

Who is right and who is wrong has more to do with intelligence and education than sanity.

[adrianh]

I can't read all this crap. I think that stooped people should be forced to commit suicide. I also think that people should be sterilized after having 2 children. Children of stooped parent should be sterilized at birth so as to spare the rest of humanity from having to endure their generic disability. I am all for genetic engineering, a certain sector of this country should be cross bred with Lemmings so that they run into the sea and not come back when they go and flood the beaches of Durban over Christmas. Further, any lost kids found roaming the beaches should be executed on sight!

[adrianh]

You know what... my maid (God bless her soul) is completely stable and sane, more sane than I am. Anyway so one day I was watching this documentary on dinosaurs, raptors in particular. She was busy sweeping and I said “Maria, what is that?” pointing at the tv....she looked for a while and said “Ostrich” then calmly carried on sweeping. Now her sanity did not determine whether her grasp of what she was seeing was correct.

So let’s apply this to you and I. You may be saner than I am, just like my maid. You see the world and conclude that the NWO is real “Ostrich” I see the world and determine it’s the way it’s always been “Utah Raptor”. My intelligence and education lead me to believe it’s a Raptor and your intelligence and education leads you to believe it’s an Ostrich.

Who is right and who is wrong has more to do with intelligence and education than sanity.

I think to be able to determine whether a person is sane or insane the one doing the deciding should be both sane and insane so as to be able to see the difference. Now the question is whether a schizophrenic sociopath with multiple personalities can be classified as being totally insane when his insane personality is in control and whether he can be classified as totally sane when his sane personality is in control. A further problem is that people who are insane are not necessarily stupid. Insanity is primarily a social standard anyway.

[adrianh]

Think about it, it is considered to be insane to shoot the crap out of lots of locals but you are considered to be a hero if you bomb and shoot the crap out of Afgans and Iraqis...go figure...one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter...cough cough...blowing up arestaurant in Cape Town...a Wimpy bar, oh and lest we forget sticking tires around people necks, dousing them with petrol and setting them alight...

..and the so called sane people have the audacity to call the rest of us insane...if that is sanity then I am quite happy to be totally off my head..I will be called Bonaparte henceforth...

[pmbguy]

Here here Bonaparte....at this point I would like to quote your old signature "I'l take crazy over stupid any day"

[adrianh]

That what is considered to be sane at the time is defined by the one who is in control...i.e. George W Bush, Jacob Zuma, Robert Mugabe, Hitler and and and..

[tec0]

Well on a list of a hundred and ten we “South Africa” are listed Twenty-second from the top. Amazingly enough I thought it might be higher...

Still consider this... if it is such a stupid idea... why is it still illegal? I mean if people will not use the option why not make it available?

Depression is almost a norm in most social cultures including our own. Now imagine if 1 out of every 1000 is suicidal and have the legal right to take their own life easily fast and painlessly. It will make a massive dent in the human population. If you think I am joking look at the antidepressant pharmaceutical market. How many people buy and use their medication to date?

Simple yet honest truth is how many people are out of work and would rather just end it because they will refuse to suffer the indignities that follow unemployment? How many people have social disorders? It is not uncommon anymore... Depression is in every home in every family and has many causes. But if you give them a legal fast and painless way out... There is no telling how many will go for that option.

@ iLLuDeano, pmbguy...

Ok now I want you to read what I wrote, Please show me where I said I am supporting this? On this thread! It is called a “hypothetical statement” Meaning; Based primarily on surmise rather than adequate evidence.


You took my words out of context add your own spin to it... This is on you not me.

Well now people will know Your Intentions.

[adrianh]

Tec0 - weed induced PMS again I see....

[pmbguy]

@ iLLuDeano, pmbguy...
Please show me where I said I am supporting this? On this thread!

You don’t need population control all you need to do is legalise suicide

Still consider this... if it is such a stupid idea... why is it still illegal? I mean if people will not use the option why not make it available?

Here you are suggesting a solution to population control “all you need to do is legalise suicide” and then you go one step further suggesting its implementation “why not make it available?”

Any person who reads your posts will think you are advocating suicide as a means of population control. Nobody misunderstood your posts.
You are simply trying to backtrack by playing the part of the misunderstood victim.

[tec0]

Here you are suggesting a solution to population control “all you need to do is legalise suicide” and then you go one step further suggesting its implementation “why not make it available?”

Any person who reads your posts will think you are advocating suicide as a means of population control. Nobody misunderstood your posts.
You are simply trying to backtrack by playing the part of the misunderstood victim.

Well I cannot help if you took what I said out of context. And you did take it out of context there is no misunderstanding. It is easy enough to do if you if you ignore the subject at hand. So that is what you did. But as YOU stated "I suggested" something. That is part of the "hypothetical"

Did I say “I support suicide” anywhere on the above? Simple answer NO I DID NOT! So please you and your other new friend can do the grownup thing and say sorry for taking things out of context request a delete and leave it at that. OR you can have over 1800 readers "give or take" read this and see what is really happening. Choice is yours.

I really do think that your intention is as clear as day.