Problem with Electrons having no Substructure.

[talanum1]

If you consider electrons to have no substructure, you must consider them as made of single actualized numbers. But electrons by definition carry many quantum numbers - incompatible with this.

My model for electrons says they are made of Riemann spheres in which circles carry space nodes and left-out space nodes to record the quantum numbers. Actually half Riemann spheres, half anti-Riemann spheres. An anti-Riemann sphere is a Riemann sphere made of left-out nodes of space.

[talanum1]

If you leave open the question of what an electron is made off, you have one explanation less than me.

[Dave A]

You talk as if a Riemann sphere is an object or particle, whereas it is mathematical model.
There is a difference between a particle and a construct, and they should not be confused

[talanum1]

My claim is that they are actualized Riemann sphere-anti-spheres. So the on paper Riemann sphere-anti-sphere is a representation of the actualized numbers.

What do you think of the fact that I claim the conventional physicist must acknowledge that an electron is a single actualized number (by their logic)?

[Dave A]

I think you are as mad as a hatter

[talanum1]

If you say that an electron is an excitation of a field, then, since a field is a number at every space point, the electron must then be a property (excitation) of a number, which takes us beyond mathematics.

My way does not go beyond mathematics.

[talanum1]

Physicists that leave open what an electron is made of or what an "excitation" is, leaves the electron unactualized.

It is thus a mistake to leave it open.

[talanum1]

Here's another leap a conventional Physicist has to make: define intrinsic angular momentum and ascribe it to a field excitation (number with property: excited). Now explain how this creates a magnetic moment. In my model this is easy: it is simply a Riemann sphere-anti-sphere that spins, with the result a calculable magnetic moment due to charge circulating.

[talanum1]

We could extend types of fields to include mass fields, charge fields, spin fields etc., but how do you couple these fields to the correct particle field?

[talanum1]

Look to the wavefunction and figure out what has to exist: presumably the electron's code number and it's probability number must exist at the same position. Then we haven't talked about all it's quantum numbers yet.

My way space only needs to read the charges to find out how the particles should react.

[talanum1]

Sentence 1 post #1 is if you believe the Universe us made out of numbers and by Occam's razor.

[talanum1]

If you believe the Universe is controlled by Mathematics, you must believe it is made of numbers.