Trying to reconcile the idea of a soul with our biological and social reality is problematic. A good person could change “bad” and a bad person could change into a “good” one through damage to the brain. Especially the frontal lobe where our “character” is based. Then consider nature vs. nurture, will a person’s soul be determined by their biological condition? perhaps they mad and bad because of a genetics. Will their soul be determined by their social environment? A person who grows up in a bad environment might become bad him/her self, does this ecological reality which determines their character then negatively affect their soul? So in some respects one could argue that the soul is a product of both nurture and nature, but is the soul in fact determined by these factors, or is the soul independent from nature and nurture? If this is the case then we cannot condemn an individual as having a corrupt soul, for it is nurture, genetics and the environment that potentially corrupts the soul. As a weird conclusion, all souls might be equal regardless of how good or bad you are, which may delete all thoughts of a soul being eater good or bad.
So where does this leave us then? If a soul’s “quality” is not determined by life, then how is it determined to be either good or bad? Perhaps it’s just an energy that goes wherever all souls go regardless of how good or bad the individual may be.
So where does this leave us then? If a soul’s “quality” is not determined by life, then how is it determined to be either good or bad? Perhaps it’s just an energy that goes wherever all souls go regardless of how good or bad the individual may be.
Comment