Welcome to The Forum SA. As a visitor you have read only access to the public content areas of this website. You will have to register as a member to access all content, post messages and network with our members. Membership is free and registering is quick and easy. You can click here to register now and become a member within minutes.
Thanks Dave, and all of u. Yes well honestly I would've like to now, cause I also feel there is a lot more to this. Still can't believe it. But yeah, rather wanna use my skills experience etc at another place that would not treat employers like that. (Cause I'm not the only one) Another question please: what do I do when employer do not meet the arrangements as stipulated in the agreement for settlement?
Another question please: what do I do when employer do not meet the arrangements as stipulated in the agreement for settlement?
I stand to be corrected here, but I am pretty sure that you would then approach the Labour Court and apply for a court order to have the agreement enforced (i.e. the Labour Court tells the employer that they must follow through with the agreement or else).
One of the flaws with our labour law system is that employers can delay the consequences of not playing by the rules (e.g. by simply ignoring settlement agreements or arbitration awards and waiting for the affected employees to apply for a court order to enforce them; or by disputing awards and escalating those disputes to the Labour Appeal Court). I have seen labour disputes drag on for years (in some cases, literally more than a decade) because obstinate employers and their unscrupulous labour attorneys gamed the system even though they were clearly in the wrong.
Obviously these obstructive tactics can come at a price (e.g. additional penalties or cost orders), but none of that is of much consolation to the affected employees who may end up waiting years for relief.
One of the important implications of the recent amendments to our labour laws is that enforcement will be sped up to mitigate these scenarios, and penalties for non-compliance will be magnified to deter it from happening in the first place.
Founder of Growth Surge - Helping entrepreneurs create more wealth and enjoy more freedom.
I would've loved that, .... Sometimes its the manager that rather wanna get rid of an employee that knows to much and is actually a threat, and the cost implications of getting employee out of way is much lower than exposure. Not always an employee. I've learned a lot and will take it and go forward.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment