Standard Bank Declines for Second Day After Breaking Credit Law

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • QUINN
    Suspended

    • Nov 2007
    • 180

    #1

    Standard Bank Declines for Second Day After Breaking Credit Law

    By Renee Bonorchis

    March 27 (Bloomberg) -- Standard Bank Group Ltd., Africa’s largest bank, fell for a second day after the lender admitted to breaking South African credit laws.

    “Whenever there is contravention of the rules it points to a failure in risk management and compliance,” Jan Meintjes, a director at Gryphon Asset Management Ltd. in Cape Town, said in an e-mailed response to questions today. “This should raise some concerns.”

    Standard Bank’s share price fell 3.10 rand, or 3.8 percent, 78 rand, after sliding 6.3 percent yesterday, the worst performer on the five-member FTSE/JSE Africa Banks Index. The stock has lost 17 percent over the past 12 months, giving Standard Bank a market value of 119 billion rand ($12.4 billion).

    Sim Tshabalala, chief executive officer of Standard Bank’s South African unit, said yesterday the lender was “sorry and embarrassed” for contravening South Africa’s National Credit Act by automatically increasing the limits on some clients’ credit cards. The lender had raised limits on 61,000 customer accounts without permission from clients, 702 Radio reported.

    Bad loan impairments at the retail banks of Standard Bank, Absa Group Ltd., FirstRand Ltd. and Nedbank Group Ltd. more than doubled last year after South Africa’s central bank raised its benchmark rate six times to 12 percent in the year through June 2008. South Africa’s National Credit Act was implemented in June 2007, protecting consumers by tightening lending controls.

    ‘Operational Slip-Up’

    While Standard Bank “is obviously in the wrong” it was more of a “compliance failure than a deliberate strategy to contravene the Act,” Meintjes said. “I don’t believe Standard Bank is taking its eye off the ball in South Africa. It knows very well that market conditions are tough in the local market and it has competent people,” he said.

    Standard Bank said it does not expect to be fined by the National Credit Regulator because the process was terminated as soon as senior executives realized the “oversight,” Tshabalala said. A provision in the law allows lenders to avoid penalties if transgressions are rectified without the regulator resorting to action. Standard is in talks with customers and regulators.

    It was “a small operational slip-up with no major implications with respect to the quality of management,” Jonathan Rawicz, a banks analyst at Nedgroup Securities, said.

    To contact the reporter on this story: Renee Bonorchis in Johannesburg at rbonorchis@bloomberg.net
  • Dave A
    Site Caretaker

    • May 2006
    • 22807

    #2
    I think they've recovered since

    It certainly was pretty wierd at the time.
    Participation is voluntary.

    Alcocks Electrical Services | Alcocks Pest Control & Entomological Services | Alcocks Hygiene Services

    Comment

    • QUINN
      Suspended

      • Nov 2007
      • 180

      #3
      What P_SSES me off is taht theu got away with it without a fine

      Comment

      • Dave A
        Site Caretaker

        • May 2006
        • 22807

        #4
        In terms of the NCA, what fine could they have been open to?

        I would have thought the main risk to the bank was if someone claimed they granted credit recklessly.
        Participation is voluntary.

        Alcocks Electrical Services | Alcocks Pest Control & Entomological Services | Alcocks Hygiene Services

        Comment

        • QUINN
          Suspended

          • Nov 2007
          • 180

          #5
          R1 million per event

          Comment

          • Graeme
            Silver Member

            • Sep 2006
            • 253

            #6
            Standard Bank shares hit R90.00 a share today. Back in March some overzealous employees embarrased the bank by raising some customers' credit card limits. It was soon picked by the bank and corrected. No harm done.

            Comment

            • Frankincense
              Silver Member

              • Nov 2008
              • 201

              #7
              .......when irregularities in operational structures are exposed, always a scapegoat is needed, preferably at a junior level, in order to preserve the establishment.....√

              "no harm done" .... the targets set for banking staff in the midst of a crises leaves them with few options.....,but yes, staff shall be blamed....and will feel the pressure.....

              When we note that Rothschilds own Barclays who own Absa(1 of four colluding SA Banks)..one needs to come to terms with the primary objective of these institutions and see them for what they have become....

              This form of corruption cacades from the top....infact it's the foundation....as the manipulation of regulatory bodies and policies and with information decentralisation, more adjustive measures are put in place to "mitigate the risk of true exposure"....


              ...It just wouldn't work if stated: "deliberate strategy to contravene the Act rather than a compliance failure "

              Comment

              Working...