Linking the Illuminati & SARB

[msmoorad]

sarb

Now you have a leader, the Freemason Paul Sauer, to step forward from the ranks of the Nationalists and preach a more moderate approach that would satisfy the world, and make all the bad things go away.

You would have a situation where the National Party would be leaderless, in a country o*n the verge of anarchy. And with the support of your men in the National Party, you could force a coalition government with the United Party. (See Oppenheimer's speech below).

This would automatically mean that the Nationalist agenda would have to be at the very least, modified. Which in effect would mean an eventual take over of power by your party - the United Party. (Which was largely funded by Oppenheimer&Co)

The only thing that went wrong was that Verwoerd survived.

Or was it?

Sauer had overplayed his hand in the belief that either Verwoerd was going to die, or that the situation in the country was so far out of control that he could go ahead, even if Verwoerd survived.

Sauer was the Brotherhood's first Vorster.

Sauer got sacked for his efforts, but the attempt on Verwoerd's life had one favorable spin-off for the Brotherhood. Verwoerd now mistrusted his minister of Justice - and he promoted their man Vorster, from deputy minister to minister of Justice.

Pratt was close enough to Verwoerd to literally have been able to put a pistol (he was armed with two!) against Verwoerd's head. Yet he shot him through the cheek. He wounded him quite severely none the less, but not fatally.

It could very well be that Pratt had been set up to fail, so as to cast blame, suspicion and mistrust on Erasmus, the then Minister of Justice, and Vorster's boss. Erasmus was, like Vorster after him, tasked with the personal safety and security arrangements of the Prime Minister.

If Pratt indeed intended to fail, this would allow the Brotherhood to get their Brutus into place. All they now had to do was to get him closer to Caesar.

The method used, was to sell him as the next Caesar.

As you shall see, they did this very effectively.

The role of Harry Oppenheimer.

At the death of Sir Ernest Oppenheimer in 1957, Harry Oppenheimer took over the reigns of the Anglo-American empire - an empire that controls or controlled 40% of the world's gold production, 80% of the world's diamond production and o*ne sixth of the world's coal production.
And he certainly was not going to let Verwoerd or anybody else, get in the way of all that.
Oppenheimer initially played the more overt role in trying to remove the National Party from power. In 1951 he formed the "United South Africa Trust Fund" to try and bring the Nationalist government to a fall in the elections of 1953 (through the United Party). Some £1 000 000 was donated to this fund, by amongst others Oppenheimer himself. (Over 1 billion rand in today's terms). As we know, this attempt failed - the Nationalists won this election by a larger majority than in 1948.
In 1960 Oppenheimer formed, with the help of amongst others his friend Eric Gallo the "South African Foundation".
In Oppenheimer's own words, the aim of the Foundation was as follows: "To summarize: the immediate task of the South African Foundation is to create an atmosphere within which it would be possible to create a coalition of moderate elements in the Government and Opposition. In reality this is the entry of the great Moneypower into politics. It is high time. My business colleagues have allowed the situation to deteriorate for too long" - Africa South - April/June edition, 1960, volume 4 number 3.

The atmosphere needed for such a coalition to be formed had to be one of a leaderless National party in a country on the verge of sliding into anarchy. Or alternatively, getting your man into position as the leader of the Nationalist party.

In both cases that would mean assassinating Verwoerd.

No?

In the same article, Oppenheimer goes further: "It is futile to try and replace Verwoerd at the polls. This, I believe, is accepted by everybody. Is there any alternative to the creation of the coalition of moderates that the Foundation is proposing? I think that I can claim the greatest credit for this exciting approach for myself; and yet, all that I have done is to allow myself to be led by what is in the interest of Anglo-American. Are you still unconvinced? How can what is good for Anglo - American, ever be bad for South Africa?"

Right.

The Foundation was a front organisation of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), that allowed Henry Kissinger and Samuel Huntington influence in the highest echelons of South African politics.

And when Kissinger takes your hand, bad things follow.

Only when it became apparent that Verwoerd was not going to be defeated at the poll, did Oppenheimer become more involved in covert activities.

It was at his house in Parktown, o*n July 27, 1964, that John Vorster was drawn into the plan to murder Verwoerd. Harry Oppenheimer and Anton Rupert were both present at this meeting. As was Quinton White (CFR and CIA agent and director of the SA Institute of Race Relations).

The role of Anton Rupert.
Anton Rupert came from nowhere, and made a fortune that rivals that of the Oppenheimers, in an amazingly short period of time - about 30 years. o*ne of the reasons he was able to do so, was that he was sponsored by the Rockerfellers. Although he does not have as high a public profile as for instance the Oppenheimers, he is at least as large a role player in getting the agenda of the global elite implemented.

And he was directly involved in the murder of Verwoerd. In fact, he was the main driving force behind at least the second and successful attempt o*n Verwoerd's life.
As far as can be ascertained, Rupert never met Tsafendas personally, but this is not to say that such a meeting never took place. Apart from the fact that he employed Tsafendas, and continued to support him financially after he was removed from Rothmans International, his car was used o*n at least o*ne occasion, driven by his personal driver, to drive a Mi6 agent to a meeting with Tsafendas.

It was also possibly Rupert that supplied the R5 000 that Tsafendas was paid to commit the murder. R5 000, assuming an average of 15% decrease in the time value of money, is some R500 000 in today's terms. (As a practical example, a 4.1 Chevrolet family car cost about R1 200, new, in 1971 - an average family car now costs about R120 000).

In addition to this Rupert was present at the meeting held at Harry Oppenheimer's house in Parktown at 18h00 o*n July 27, 1964. It was during this meeting that Vorster was drawn into the murder plot, firstly by again promising him the post of Prime Minister after Verwoerd, and secondly, by threatening him to make public his involvement with supplying the CIA and Mi6 (spying for them) with sensitive information from the inner circles of parliament and the Broederbond. A look at Vorster's profile below will show that this was not the only covert activities that he was involved in.
The meeting started at 16h30 and lasted till 20h00.Vorster was apparently hesitant at first, but after the threats and promises, as well as a reminder of his duty as a Freemason, concurred.
Present at this meeting was Oppenheimer, Rupert and Quinton Whyte (CFR, CIA and SA Institute to Race Relations) as well as an unnamed Mi6 agent. It was also during this meeting that Whyte handed over to Vorster a final blueprint as to how he was to run the country after Verwoerd's death. (The first was handed to Vorster in 1963 after he became involved with the Council o*n Foreign Relations).
More than two years before Tsafendas was to kill Verwoerd.

But this is just the tip of the ice-berg as far as Rupert's involvement is concerned - as will become clear later.

The role of John Vorster.

John Vorster was strongly influenced during his student years by professor WMR Malherbe - a known Freemason, of high order.

In September of 1937, during the reign of the Brotherhood man, Jan Smuts, Vorster is recruited as agent for the police - in order to infiltrate the Ossewa-Brandwag - a rightwing political organisation, to which Robey Leibrant belonged (Leibrant later tried to assassinate Smuts).
Vorster underwent training from the last quarter of 1937 to February 1938 - o*n how to infiltrate the Ossewa-Brandwag.
As part of his undercover operation he objected to Smuts involving South Africa in the Second World War (on the side of Britain). He was "caught" in 1942, sent to the Pretoria Central jail, transferred to Leeukop jail outside Johannesburg and from there to Koffiefontein - to be finally released in 1944. In all three places, Vorster was visited, every week by a man by the name of Julian (or Julius) Furst, and they were apparently very close.

Furst was Joe Slovo's first father in law.

After his release, Vorster masterminded the inclusion of the Ossewa-Brandwag into mainstream politics.

And he set about selling himself as being ultra rightwing.

In October 1958 Oppenheimer is informed during a session of a Freemason's Lodge in Johannesburg that Vorster was a spy for the Smuts government. This revelation was done by none other than Ernie Malherbe - the Chief of Military Intelligence under Smuts.

At the same time the Rupert and Oppenheimer newspapers were subtly punting Vorster for his political achievements.

In August of 1961 Vorster is promoted to Minister of Justice. He was informed of this by Verwoerd o*n July 24, 1961. When Vorster told his wife Tini this, she told him (she is also from a Brotherhood bloodline) that he had to inform Anton Rupert. Vorster phoned Rupert o*n 24 July 1961 and informed him.

Now get this.
Anton Rupert told Vorster to come and see him (Rupert) at his home in Cape Town! Rupert basically summonses o*ne of Verwoerd's most important ministers to his house!

So who is running the country?

Vorster duly flew down to Cape Town o*n July 26, 1961 and met with Rupert the same day.

Two interesting things happened at this meeting:
1. Vorster is recruited as intelligence agent by the CIA. He is also promised the position of Prime Minister for the first time.
2. Vorster makes his first contact with Harry Oppenheimer - when he phones Oppenheimer from Rupert's house o*n Rupert's instructions.

The Sunday Times, owned by Oppenheimer, announced the appointment of Vorster as minister of Justice five days later - o*n July 31, 1961.

One day before the official announcement of Vorster's appointment!

Form then o*n Vorster was punted by the Rupert and Oppenheimer newspapers as o*ne of the extremist rightwing trio of the National Party - along with Hertzog and Verwoerd.

Right. Sure. No problem.

Vorster did his bit by announcing hard core safety measures, and by fighting Communism and Liberalism with vigor. Most of his successes against Communist and Liberal organizations was due to him getting inside information regarding these organizations from the CIA (which was covertly running these organizations) and Oppenheimer (who was funding them). The result was spectacular arrests and success against banned organizations.

Vorster was further assisted by the CIA and Mi6 through their covert operations. They ensured ongoing unrest, often resulting in the death of innocent black people, which in turn ensured that the safety and security situation remained a top priority with the government and the public.

[msmoorad]

continuation

Which in turn made Vorster's role more and more important. And with the successes he achieved with the inside information that he received on these organizations from Oppenheimer, the CIA and Mi6, he remained in the public eye.

All of this ensured that Vorster became a more and more acceptable figure in the eyes of the conservative electorate.

In the meantime, in 1962, Vorster increased his involvement and contact with the Brotherhood through his involvement in the South African Institute of International Affairs (a CFR front with which Vorster had an involvement since 1936), the South African Foundation (what's good for Anglo American is good for SA) and was recruited as agent for Mi6 in September 1962.
In 1963 he became involved with the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). In July of this year Vorster was given a blueprint by the CIA and CFR which stipulated what they wanted, and did not want, him to do in South Africa. Present at the meeting at which this blueprint was handed over, was Oppenheimer, Rupert, Quinton Whyte (director of SA Institute of Race Relations, CIA agent and CFR agent) as well as an unnamed agent of Mi6.

Vorster was also a Freemason since 1936.

As stated before, John Vorster was drawn into the plot to murder Verwoerd o*n July 27, 1964. It was also o*n this same day, later that evening, at a meeting at Vorster's house, that he pulled "Lang Hendrik" van den Bergh into the plot against Verwoerd. Van den Bergh and Vorster met at Vorster's house in Pretoria between 21h00 and 22h00 o*n the same evening as Vorster was drawn into the plot to murder Verwoerd.
Van den Bergh himself has a pretty colorful history, as is shown below.

In about 1962 Vorster realized that he needed a close ally to help him maintain his cover in the double role he was playing (Brotherhood agent o*n the o*ne hand and artificial right wing extremist o*n the other). This is when he drew Lang Hendrik van den Bergh, with whom he had become friendly during his internment in the 40's. He offered Lang Hendrik the job as his Chief of the Security Police.

The role of "Lang Hendrik" van den Bergh.

Van den Bergh joined the police in 1934. In 1938 he was transferred to the Johannesburg Liquor Unit. Which, contrary to it's name, had as it's main aim to spy on the Ossewa - Brandwag. He, as undercover agent, was "arrested" and interned along with Vorster in 1942.

This was also the year in which he became a Freemason - possibly due to his contact and friendship with Vorster.

In 1945 van den Bergh started relations with the SA institute of Race Relations.

And in 1949 he rejoined the police force. In 1961, as a Major, he was transferred to the Security Police as deputy commander.

Van den Bergh agreed to take over the Command of the Security Police - which he did on January 14, 1963, on condition that he could restructure the branch. Vorster agreed and also arranged for him to be promoted from the rank of Major to that of General - a jump of some 6 important ranks.

From a rank associated with a senior station commander, to that of commanding officer of the most influential police service and one of the most influential and powerful government organizations in South Africa at that stage.

This happened in January 1963 - it was also during this same year that van den Bergh built personal links with the CIA and Council of Foreign Relations, which led to his involvement with amongst others, Henry Kissinger.

The role of Mi6 and the CIA.

Mi6 brainwashed or mind-controlled Tsafendas, and trained him in assassination techniques and in the use of weapons. There is an unconfirmed report that during the meeting in Birmingham in May of 1963 Mi6 agreed to paying Tsafendas to commit the murder.
In any event it was either Mi6 or Anton Rupert that supplied the money paid over to Tsafendas to commit the murder. (See below).

The idea to murder Verwoerd in parliament originated with Vorster, and was discussed by Henry Kissinger, the CIA, Mi6 and Lang Hendrik van den Bergh over the period of July 27 to August 6, 1965, during a visit of van den Bergh to the offices of the CIA and the Council o*n Foreign Relations in Washington DC.
Kissinger was at that time employed by the CFR. Mi6 informed everybody present of the progress of the plot to murder Verwoerd, and all present agreed to Vorster's plan for murdering Verwoerd in parliament. Van den Bergh was also instructed during this meeting that he and Vorster had to assist Tsafendas in gaining access to Parliament.
Van den Bergh was further fully briefed by the CIA o*n how to go about covering their tracks and was instructed to destroy security documentation relating to Tsafendas.

When Kissinger takes your hand ……………

Shortly after van den Bergh's visit to Washington, Mi6 met with Vorster and van den Bergh in order to find out more about the procedures in Parliament. The most relaxed time in parliament, as well as the time during which there is the most movement of people, and therefore the lowest security, is just after lunch. All members are then returning to their benches for the start of the afternoon session.
Tsafendas murdered Verwoerd just after lunch, and such was the disorganization, and the standard of the training of Tsafendas that he stabbed Verwoerd four times, before anyone reacted.

As I've said before - it is not easy to kill a man with a knife. o*ne of the strokes Tsafendas employed is o*nly taught to specialist army and security units. It consists of stabbing the victim through the left shoulder - from above. The blade passes between the "arms" of the collar bone, and if it is long enough will penetrate the heart from above. At the very least, it will sever the major arteries at the top of the lungs, puncture the lung and sever the major arteries at the top of the heart.

It is also the most effective way and o*ne of o*nly three strokes with which you can instantly kill a man that is sitting down.

But o*nly if you stab him through the left shoulder, and at the right angle. Tsafendas, "enraged by the injustices of Apartheid" as he was, got both the shoulder and the angle right.

Mi6, probably with the help of the SAS, showed him just how to do it.

The role of Demetrio Tsafendas.
Demetrio Tsafendas arrived in Britain in May 1959. He admitted after the murder o*n Verwoerd that he moved in "Leftist" circles in Britain and that at that time the possibility of shooting Verwoerd had been mentioned. This indeed happened in 1960.

In May of 1960, Tsafendas mentioned to employees of Anton Rupert's British cigarette factory, Rothmans International, that he would kill Verwoerd, if he ever got the chance.
This threat of Tsafendas' was brought to Rupert's attention in the same month, May of 1961.

And just over a month later, in July of 1961, Tsafendas suddenly finds himself employed by Rothmans International!

In January of 1962 this relationship of Tsafendas with Rupert's factory (Rothmans) was formally terminated, and as from February 1962 Tsafendas was "unemployed" - but he was still being paid from financial resources of Rupert.

As far as can be ascertained, Rupert never personally spoke to Tsafendas during this period of six or so months.
Rupert continued to pay Tsafendas, and in March of 1963, Anton Rupert arranged a meeting in Birmingham with four other people - members of the Council o*n Foreign Relations (CFR), the CIA and Mi6. It was during this meeting that it was decided to murder Verwoerd, and that Tsafendas would be pulled in, and paid to do the dirty work.
It was also at this meeting that it was decided that Mi6 would train Tsafendas, and keep the CIA and CFR informed, at high level, of any progress made.

The first training session took place in July of 1963 in the Kerkira area in Greece. During this session Mi6 brain-washed Tsafendas mainly through hypnotic techniques.
The spear or Assegai was used as sign for triggering Tsafendas in a post hypnotic state. More about this shortly.

The time and place of the second training session is unknown, but what is known is that it was scheduled and that it was intended to concentrate o*n weapon skills and assassination techniques, with amongst other things, knives. Specialist training probably provided by the Special Air Service.

In November of 1963 Tsafendas came into South Africa, legally, but quite controversially. As stated before, he was a self-confessed Communist, he had a criminal record with Interpol and he had a known history (Interpol) of mental instability.

At 21h30 o*n the 9th of June 1965, Tsafendas is paid R5 000 to murder Verwoerd. The payment was made by an agent of Mi6.
This agent was driven to this meeting in Anton Rupert's car by Anton Rupert's driver.
Although Rupert was not present at this meeting, at least a reasonable possibility must exist that he supplied the money.

I believe that Tsafendas was chosen for a few reasons:

His mental profile would make him eminently suitable for brain washing and mind control,
He had known Communist affiliations - which would give him a back ground or cover for a "motive" for wanting to kill Verwoerd,
He had expressed his willingness to kill Verwoerd. I believe that this was the reason for his employment with Rothmans International for some six months - it was to observe him and see if he had (or lacked) what it would take to brainwash him to actually go through with the murder.
He was expendable and far from home - where someone could conceivable have created a stink about his trial and the fact that he was declared mentally ill and locked up for life. (This is an old trick of theirs - Pratt was an Englishman, Tsafendas a Greek, and Janus Walus, that murdered Chris Hani, a Pole)

Let's summarize the procedure.

Simple. Demetrio Tsafendas was recruited, brain washed, trained, supplied with an opportunity, triggered and then kept quiet.

As stated before, Tsafendas was let into this country, as a known Communist, when there was a witch hunt going o*n for Communists. This hunt was led by none other than John Vorster. And yet he let Tsafendas in.

Tsafendas was supplied with a job at Rothmans International, while Oppenheimer and Rupert consolidated Vorster's position - mainly through building him up through their newspapers. They made him out to be ultra-conservative and the "strong man" of Nationalist politics. He was also portrayed as very much pro-apartheid and anti-Communist.
All of which made him very acceptable to the conservative white electorate of the time.
The ideal man to follow in Verwoerd's footsteps.

And all of which, if you read his personal profile above, is absolute nonsense. He never had anything other than the Brotherhood's agenda and his own personal and political gain in mind.

In any case, Tsafendas was then put in place - given a job in the inner chamber of parliament, without going through a security or background check. Contrary to a standing instruction to the Speaker, made in 1962, that before anybody was to be appointed to a job in parliament, a report o*n them had to be obtained from the police.

Tsafendas was appointed to his job in Parliament o*n July 20, 1966, by John Vorster, effective from August 1, 1966.
A mere 37 days before he murdered Verwoerd, and more importantly, a mere 8 days before he was to be deported. His deportation order was signed o*n the 8th of August 1966.
Lang Hendrik van den Bergh, as chief of the Secret Police, and as close friend and co-conspirator of Vorster, would have known that Tsafendas' deportation was imminent, and it would seem obvious, advised Vorster accordingly. They then used their influence to stall or squash this order, until Tsafendas could murder Verwoerd.

So now, Tsafendas had his opportunity.

All that was left was to trigger him.

Dr. Willie Visser, the psychiatrist that evaluated Tsafendas after the murder stated: "Demetrio Tsafendas did indeed murder Dr. Verwoerd under the force and compulsion of intensive brainwashing and strong post-hypnotic suggestion."
Tsafendas was programmed to be triggered by two things:
The words "Murder in the heart", and
a picture of the blade of a spear, or assegai that had drops of blood o*n it. Each drop signified a period of time, within which the "order" had to be carried out, and the spear signified the act of murder.

Just such a symbol appeared, in conjunction with Verwoerd's face, o*n the front page of "The Time" of 26 August 1966.
And inside this magazine was a six page article about South Africa. o*nly o*ne heading appeared in the margin next to the text of this six page article.

This heading was "Murder in the heart."

"The Time" is the magazine of The Round Table group - o*ne of the lower order front organizations of the Illuminati and Freemasons.
Tsafendas had been instructed to o*nly look out for "The Time" and to take note of the front page specifically.
The spear blade o*n the cover next to Verwoerd's face, had two drops of blood o*n it.

The two drops of blood in all probability signified a two week period within which the "instruction" had to be carried out, for the following reasons:
Tsafendas murdered Verwoerd 12 days later (after being "triggered"),
Tsafendas told some crew of the Eleni o*n either 26 or 27 August 1966, that he wanted to buy a pistol or a knife - for self protection. This would fit in with the "triggering" of Tsafendas by the magazine that appeared o*n August 26. He told the crew members that he could get a good job at a hotel, and wanted the weapon for self defense. More about this shortly.
Any shorter period of time (for instance two days) does not allow enough flexibility in the case of unforeseen problems,
Any shorter period of time might have made it difficult to get close enough to Verwoerd to kill him.

Tsafendas wanted to buy a weapon for self defense?

Think about this:
Tsafendas already had a good job in parliament,
Tsafendas was paid the equivalent of R500 000 in today's terms, just a year before, so he was not short of money,
He said that he could get a good job at a hotel. Surely the hotel business, especially in those days, was not o*ne that carried with it risks to the extent that o*ne felt the need for self protection?

The point is that it all seems all very simple and logical in the way that it was stated by Tsafendas. At closer inspection, however, it appears to be irrational - and more than that - it is a clear attempt at rationalizing something that is obviously not true. And this rationalization of patently senseless circumstances and behaviour, is o*ne of the strongest symptoms and manifestations of behaviour under post-hypnotic suggestion.

It is this same technique that stage hypnotists use to make people do silly things o*n stage and then defend or justify their actions.
You know the drill - the hypnotist hypnotizes the subject, tells him that when he is awake again, the hypnotist will ring a bell (trigger) and at hearing this bell the subject will believe he or she is for example, and elephant, and as such will act in a prescribed way. The subject is "woken up", the bell rung, and all hell breaks loose - to the great amusement of the audience.

On August 26, 1966 the "bell rang" and o*n September 6, 1966, all hell broke loose - Tsafendas murdered Verwoerd.

Now, all that was left, was to keep Tsafendas quiet.

I believe that there is a possibility that the Brotherhood again slipped up here, or that things did not go as planned.
Tsafendas was hit in the face by a policeman (it may even have been van den Bergh - but that aspect is to be covered in the documentary o*n Tsafendas o*n SABC), but I believe that there is a good chance that someone was standing by to shoot him.

Same as what happened to Lee Harvey Oswald after he supposedly assassinated Kennedy.

In any event, the eliminator either could not or would not shoot, so Tsafendas had to be dealt with in another manner.

Interestingly enough, none other than Lang Hendrik van den Bergh "interrogated" Tsafendas for 48 hours after the murder - alone.
Nobody else was allowed near Tsafendas. Van den Bergh had a reputation for torture and mind manipulation, second to none.
Only after this was the chief state psychiatrist allowed to evaluate Tsafendas.

It was also van den Bergh that declared emphatically, half way through this interrogation session, that Tsafendas had definitely been acting alone and that there was no conspiracy involved.

Really?

Interestingly enough, van den Bergh, after his interrogation of Tsafendas, also declared "that the man was not responsible for his own actions".

The truth at last.

And it was after this that the psychiatrist stated that Tsafendas had murdered Verwoerd under the force of intensive brainwashing and strong post-hypnotic suggestion.

So there was no conspiracy? Ah, well - I suppose Tsafendas could have brainwashed and then hypnotized himself.

Previous investigators and authors o*n this subject seem to believe that this post hypnotic "trauma" observed by Dr. Visser was caused by the brain washing or mind controlling of Tsafendas by Mi6, in order to program him into the murder.
I believe that at least some of the trauma was due to that, but I also believe that part of it was due to his session with Van den Bergh.

And I believe that his session with Van den Bergh was designed to ensure that either Tsafendas did not talk, or to reprogram and trigger him into a state of confusion similar to that of insanity - which would have the same effect, from the Brotherhood perspective.

According to Die Beeld (then still a Sunday paper) of September 11, 1966, van den Bergh was approached o*n the afternoon of September 6, the day of the murder about Tsafendas and had a file o*n Tsafendas available in minutes. Vorster, at the same time, based o*n information given him by van den Bergh, issued a statement that the report that the Security Police had a file o*n Tsafendas, "was devoid of all truth".
Van den Bergh explained this away, by saying that he obtained the information immediately after the murder, by requesting it from the Security Police in Mozambique. And he had it available in minutes? Remember this was in the days before faxes, e-mail etc. In 1969, when the Armstrong landed o*n the moon, it was a common joke that it was easier to place a call from the moon than it was to place a call from Pretoria to Johannesburg. So how easy was it to get through to Mozambique in 1966?
.

[msmoorad]

the last part of the article

And why Mozambique? Why not Greece or Britain? Or even Interpol?

The same issue of Die Beeld carried a main article which, amongst others had the following to say:" From where the eagerness to believe that there was a successful conspiracy to stab South Africa to the heart through it's Prime Minister?……. Why so keen to believe in a successful conspiracy against us before there is anything other than popular rumors to substantiate such an event? Through this we are not doing ourselves any favors. We are o*nly telling the world in advance that we believe in the power of our enemies"
Die Beeld - Anton Rupert's newspaper.

As far as I can ascertain, Tsafendas was also never allowed to talk or take the witness stand during his trial.

Why?

I am looking forward to seeing how the whole issue is portrayed in the TV documentary. Especially to be able to form as much as is possible of an opinion of Tsafendas as person.

As I said before, I do not believe that he was insane. And I believe that to a large extent he is ignorant of the real events. He was manipulated and used, and I do not believe that he is or was fully aware of what he was manipulated to do.
In the abbreviated version of this newsletter I asked the question as to why Tsafendas, surely the definitive political prisoner, was never pardoned by the Truth and Reconciliation commission.
He is an old man now, and if official reports are to be believed, he is ill.

Let's assume that he is indeed insane. He is still and old and ill man, and his crime was still, in his mind, and in the eyes of the public, politically motivated.

On the grounds of insanity he cannot be set free, for his own protection, and that of society.

Why not at least move him from prison to a mental institution? Where he can receive visitors at his leisure?

Why not indeed.

I have o*ne more question: If Tsafendas is or was murderously insane, why had he never murdered anybody, or even shown the inclination to do so, other than Verwoerd? If he is "insane" o*ne would assume that he has to be kept locked up, in order to avoid him killing someone else.

A frail and sick old man?

And the Truth and Reconciliation Commission pardoned many, many people that have killed many, many more people than Tsafendas.

If Tsafendas dies before the end of this year, it will just be part of the ritual and symbolism that is so important to these people.

For it is 33 years ago that Demetrio Tsafendas murdered Hendrik French Verwoerd for the Brotherhood, as part of their agenda for global control.

Why the need to murder Verwoerd?

Harry Oppenheimer probably supplied the best answer to this in his speech quoted from Africa South volume 4 number 3 - April/June 1960:
"In reality this is the entry of the great Moneypower into politics. It is high time. My business colleagues have allowed the situation to deteriorate for too long" and "It is futile to try and replace Verwoerd at the polls. This, I believe, is accepted by everybody."

The global elite not o*nly wanted the gold and diamonds, they want to control this country and the world. This is evidenced in their involvement with political parties all over the world.

Verwoerd had two big drawbacks for them:
He was politically unapproachable - he did what he believed (rightly or wrongly- the stubborn Boer mentality) was in the best interest of South Africa, and he definitely did not subscribe to Oppenheimer's opinion of "How can what is good for Anglo-American ever be bad for South Africa."
He did it all with South African savings money - he did not want or need their money, which meant that they had no lever over him. He went even further. Verwoerd had had Anglo-American and the banks owned by it , investigated.

On the day that he was murdered, Dr. Verwoerd had o*n his desk a report compiled by Professor Piet Hoek. This report was the result of an investigation into the stranglehold that Anglo-American had managed to get o*n the economy of this country. It also contained information and an evaluation of how the banks made millions of rands in profits o*n money that literally did not exist, by charging capital and interest thereon.

Verwoerd was about to challenge all of the measures for economic manipulation and exploitation that the Brotherhood has so carefully put in place. If the Brotherhood lost it's economic grip, they would lose South Africa.

They could not, by their own admission, move Verwoerd at the polls, he did not want to borrow their money, he did not care for the way in which they conducted business, and he was about to bring it all to the fore, in a direct confrontation.

So what to do?

Enter Tsafendas.

Cue cards courtesy of Rupert, Oppenheimer, Whyte, Vorster, van den Bergh, Kissinger, Mi6 and the CIA.

This country has been run by the brotherhood elite since 1963, when Vorster received his first blue print. That control was not complete, but it increased and culminated in the current government.
Smilies
There was one maverick - PW Botha. Botha was never a Freemason, and for all his faults and theatrics, he genuinely believed that what he was doing was in he best interest of the country.
They got rid of him, the main instigator of the coup against him being the high order Freemasons: De Klerk and Pik Botha.

PW had some "faults" as far as the Brotherhood agenda was concerned:
He did not want to take loans to the country, offered by Rothschild in Cape Town. These loans were based on Jewish gold taken by the Nazi's during the Second World War. PW refused the loan on the basis that he considered it to be "blood money".
PW wanted a reasonable transformation and actual negotiation process to take place in taking South Africa into a new political era. This included the ANC denouncing violence before negotiations could start or Mandela be freed. And it looked as if he was going to succeed. The real risk to the Brotherhood was that PW would then control the process, and in doing so, the real leaders of the Black people of South Africa may emerge and come into power, instead of the Brotherhood's pre-selected puppets.

Exit PW.

Enter FW - who put the whole process on skids down a slippery incline, finished what he had to do, collected his 30 pieces silver and retired to Spain.

Nelson Mandela, for all of his wonderful characteristics, is and has always been a puppet in the hands of the elite. He was sworn in as a Freemason shortly after his release. Do some research on the Nelson Mandela Children’s Fund-you will notice that the sponsors are Illuminati companies who make Madiba feel as though they really care about the plight of black children .

Another example, Mandela asked Oppenheimer's permission before appointing Tito Mboweni as the next governor of the Reserve Bank. This was some six weeks before the news was made official. At the same time Oppenheimer "borrowed" an unconfirmed R3 billion from the Reserve Bank and moved it overseas.
At around R4,50 to the US dollar. When the news hit that Mboweni, a trade unionist, had been made governor, the rand slid to R6,80- odd ?

Now if you had just bought dollars for R4,50, and you could now resell them for R6,80, you've made a nice profit of some 51% in six short weeks.

And you can ignore the fact that you could not sell that amount of dollars without affecting the price negatively in a short period of time.
Take your time.
So the SA Reserve Bank is going to be caught short o*n dollars. Which means interest rates in SA will sky rocket from 16,75 to 22.5% prime lending rates.
Don't worry. The public will pay the difference, as they have always done.
And if a few loose their houses, or cars, or jobs, or businesses in the process, think of it like this:

How can what is good for Anglo-American ever be bad for South Africa?

The current situation.

Why is there so much war in Southern and Central Africa? Why are more people dying in African wars, especially in the Southern and Central regions of the continent?

In January 1975 the Washington Post makes mention of a Rockefeller-Rothschild-Oppenheimer plan that was put in place in 1960, that had the following aims as part of it's agenda:

1. The institution of a economical super-government over the southern half of the continent,
2. The consolidation of the economies of Angola, Zaire (Democratic Republic of Congo), Rhodesia (Zimbabwe), Malawi, Mozambique and South Africa. (Note the exception of Namibia and Botswana - this will be discussed later).
3. Removing Verwoerd as Prime Minister (this in 1960 - four months before the first and six years before the second attempt o*n Verwoerd's life)
4. Destroying Portuguese colonial rule in Angola and Mozambique.

Look at the countries mentioned in this plan of the Brotherhood-elite.

Angola - war currently raging. For o*ne reason o*nly. Savimbi wants at least part of the riches of the country for it's people, or for himself. That means excluding the Brotherhood, that currently owns and exploits it with the help of the puppet MPLA government.

Democratic Republic of Congo - second or third civil war in as many years.

Zimbabwe - the bush war that led to the elite's puppet Mugabe wielding power.

Malawi - virtually depopulated and after a brief period of unrest, Banda is ousted and the Brotherhoods man is in.

Mozambique - freedom war and then long civil war until the UN is now in charge there.

South Africa - war in Namibia and other borders. Part of the process of pressurizing the country into democratic government, kindly sponsored by Oppenheimer & Co.

The current situation will be the subject of the follow up to this newsletter.

And while we debate the merits of including AJ Venter into the Springbok Rugby team, and speculate about our chances of retaining the World Cup, the Brotherhood elite is slowly but surely setting up for a war in this country.

Much of what is published here, has been published before. Much is based o*n information from previous agents of National Intelligence, as well as o*n private research and intelligence work done by private investigators. Some of it, as indicated are my own opinions, based o*n personal experience and observation of the facts.
PS- Nathan Mayer Rothschild is a 56% shareholder of Barclays UK which, in turn, is a majority shareholder of ABSA.
For more info just Google the ffg words: Illuminati, Rothschild, Federal Reserve Bank, Bank of England, The “Crown� & the City of London, Cecil John Rhodes
-theres so much of info on the internet but theres lots if disinformation as well, these people control upto 96% of the worlds media but theyre having a hard time controlling the flow of info on the internet so they have their people to confuse you with lies mixed in with the truth to confuse you & create doubt.
-Soon a time will come when even the internet will be totally under their control- so make the most of it while you can.
Inform as many people as you can because if we don’t know whats really going on & who is really pulling the strings in the first place, we are much more easier to manipulate and deceive .
im an indian & i used to hate the NP- but i always remember that many times on the news , when there was any bombing, murder, violence etc, the reporter would say that the police suspect a third force??
who/what is this third force?
-if the internet was not available to us, i dont think most of us would know even a bit of what we know now!

[Dave A]

That's some heavy reading. I found some aspects to be quite a stretch at times.

PW had some "faults" as far as the Brotherhood agenda was concerned:
He did not want to take loans to the country, offered by Rothschild in Cape Town. These loans were based on Jewish gold taken by the Nazi's during the Second World War. PW refused the loan on the basis that he considered it to be "blood money".

[Dave A]

Something I should have asked earlier -

msmoorad, who is the writer of the newsletter?

[msmoorad]

Something I should have asked earlier -

msmoorad, who is the writer of the newsletter?

i got it from a site called boerevryheid.LOL
yup its true.
i did not even know it exists but a googls search with certain keywords produced this result(one of them_

[Frankincense]

It is done.

That was light on the matter! Thank You for that MSMoorad.

"Mandela asked Oppenheimer's permission before appointing Tito Mboweni"

We have in no uncertain terms Linked the Illuminati to SARB which was my intention by creating this Thread. It is done, and we ought to have little to disagree upon, but still there will be those....

So.... knowing the future of our Banking Systems Locally & Globally, am actually going to be ok to see many humans totally controlled by transactional accesses due to their ignorance and poor attitudes towards sentiments alluring to the fact that we are becoming prey to conspiracy blueprints being maintained for over 60 years.

Lock Down initiated

[Dave A]

Thanks msmoorad. I was having a hard time placing the mindset. The reptiles I could take as poetic licence, the Illuminati trace could come from pretty much anywhere. But putting Oppenheimer with neo-nazi connections! It takes many hours staring at the campfire to figure that one out.

It's amazing how things have moved on. At the end of the day, that story is pretty harsh on what were volk heroes in their day.

[msmoorad]

fact vs fiction

hello all

in all my 35 years on earth i have learnt that things are not always what they appear to be.
actually, they are hardly ever what they appear to be.
those that are portrayed as good by the media are "the baddies" and those that are portrayed as bad are actually the good guys.
this is most true in the context of international affairs like war,politics, business & finance.
for everything the media "informs" us about , theres 10 things they conveniently forget to mention.
so if we had to form an opinion of whats happening based on what we "learn" from them, we would have a skewed/biased view.
anyway check this out by David Icke:

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/hitler_was_a_rothschild.htm

this is the part that caught my eye:

And the Rothschild's were not satisfied with causing the unimaginable suffering of Jewish people under the Nazis, they also stole their wealth when the war was over, just as they stole the Russian wealth during the revolution they had financed.

In early 1998, during a speaking tour of South Africa, I had a personal meeting with P.W. Botha, the apartheid President of South Africa during the 1980s. The invitation came out of the blue when I was speaking a few miles from his home. We spoke for an hour and a half about the manipulation of South Africa and it was not long before names like Henry Kissinger, Lord Carrington, and the Rothschild's came up.

"I had some strange dealings with the English Rothschild's in Cape Town when I was president", he said, and he went on to tell me a story that sums up the Rothschild's so perfectly. He said they had asked for a meeting with him and his foreign minister, the Illuminati operative, Pik Botha (no relation). At that meeting, he said, the Rothschild's told him there was massive wealth in Swiss bank accounts which once belonged to German Jews and it was available for investment in South Africa if they could agree an interest rate. This is the very wealth, stolen from German Jews who suffered under the Nazis, which has come to light amid great scandal in recent years. The Rothschild's have been making a fortune from it since the war!! Botha told me he refused to accept the money, but Pik Botha left the meeting with the Rothschild's and he could not be sure that they did not come to some arrangement.

Breathtaking? Of course it is, but the world is not how we think it is.

heres another website:

http://www.namebase.org/diamond.html

this is just the beginning of the article:
Nelson Mandela is the president of South Africa, an event of monumental significance in world history. This great personal triumph is for him a vindication of his struggle. But now that the South African elections are long past, the record must be set straight about what really happened and why. The press has concealed as much as it reported; ideologues of all stripes have rushed around to rationalize their hypocrisies, and American politicians have been spreading around largesse as if the money were their own. That the results were so perfect, historically so symmetrical, is rather remarkable.
But, those with power, or who are connected to it, do not want the facts about the funding of the election to be known because it would reveal a pattern of deception and control, both to influence the outcome and to moderate the African National Congress. And those on the radical left don't want it known that the ANC has compromised itself by joining the list of organizations taking money from the United States, because they think it will hurt the cause of revolution. Everyone involved, across the ideological spectrum, has therefore joined in a kind of game to cloud the minds of outside observers.

Most hypocritical perhaps was the attempt to make a devil out of Chief Mangosuthu Buthelezi by characterizing him as the tool of the oppressors and an obstructionist in the transition to democracy. His anomalous situation in post-apartheid South Africa led to suggestions that he was an enemy of democracy, and the cause of dissension that led to violence in an attempt to disrupt the electoral process that black South Africans struggled for decades to achieve. Chairman of the Inkatha Freedom Party and chief minister of KwaZulu, this prince and descendant of Shaka Zulu was then cast in the role of villain and reactionary. But it was not always so.

i have more stuff for you, if you behave.
see you later.

[Dave A]

And the Rothschild's were not satisfied with causing the unimaginable suffering of Jewish people under the Nazis, they also stole their wealth when the war was over,

OK. I'll bite. What's the story behind that notion?

[msmoorad]

nothing but the truth

nearly every Jew & most muslims believe that we muslims hate ALL Jews.
the truth is that the Zionists/Illiminati/Satanists have hijacked the jewish nation and used their insecurities/fears as a means of uniting them agaist ALL of mankind & esp the Muslims.
they are taught that we hate them & are out to get them.
Yes, if anyone (jew or whoever) does something wrong, they should pay for it.
when the (illegal ) state of Israel was formed, the jews were living a comfortable life in Europe and the Zionists masterminded the entire Hitler/Holocaust episode to drive them out to the newly formed Israel.
they sponsored hitler and used him to unite the jews and make them feel as if the only way out was to go to "israel" - which they conveniently did not mention to them , was already called Palestine & a homeland of the palestinian people.
Yes, there is another issue, Jews have always been involved in lending money on interest ( & they hate physical labour) which naturally created dislike and in some cases hatred for them and was the real reason for them being driven out of many lands through history.
this would apply to anyone, even an Arab if he were to engege in the same activity. so Jews should not feel "they hate us"
actually its "they hate what youre doing"
if you stop, problem solved.
the proof is there, if you really want it.
the best part is that all the info/research articles are by white Christians & Jews!!!

so inobody can say- "these muslims/Arabs" hate us"

i could go on but i think thats enough.

[Dave A]

We're both from Durban and know that the various religious communities can co-exist quite well, even the ones who are a little tricky to pidgeon-hole on the religious front
But that's wandering quite far off-topic. Religion is just one of the many levels at which you can choose to define your social identity and i.r.o. this discussion is probably a red herring.

Have you any idea why Ickle keeps harping on about the Rothschilds ending up with the Nazi/ex-Jewish gold?

[sgafc]

illuminati south african agenda

great article..I have researched..this network too. It takes some mental gymnastic to grasp,but I always suspected a strong south african link.

[reuben]

ja brew it seems all is right from my side, your side ??? depends from were you are standing/watching in or out. if one really stops and think about life in general ,some were made to be brainy others labourers and so forth ,and the big bang of it all ,it's irrespective who,were what and even from witch nation or greed one is .my opion???

[reuben]

Maybe a previous disadvantage or aggrieved ,person by the Rothschild's and so forth???