When will this Bottom Feeder be eyed by the Competition Commission?

**mother** · 09-Jul-11, 10:01 AM

Andy, everytime I see your avatar, I think I'm looking at a picture of Chester, the singer of Linkin Park.... And everytime I read your posts I enjoy them as much as I do the band's music!

**apprepcen** · 09-Jul-11, 03:59 PM

Originally posted by AndyD

Okay, let's see what I see, and yeah, I already went through your posts several times in fact over the past week or so. There's a few things not making sense, you start out being a guy who's owned a very small business for 10 years with around R5000/month income and, after a sudden conscience attack, wants to come clean with SARS. On top of that there's no books for that business yet one day after you approach SARS you walk away with a tax clearance certificate.

Two tax avoidance threads (1) (2) and a miscellaneous thread on gemstone processing later it turns out you're now starting a new business and requiring investors and already have a 'sole mandate to distribute the total production of a certain mineral in the Russian Federation worldwide, except in Russia'. All this whilst harbouring some kind of grudge against the appliance repair industry in which you 'made a lot of money' but ultimately the business failed.

So what I'm seeing from your posts is this;

There's an engineered theme running through them that points in the direction of you fishing. You're fishing for investors who might be lucky enough to get in on the ground floor of some circus you're cooking up the involves worldwide distribution of gemstones from the former USSR and there's going to be massive returns because not only have you secured the sole mandate, you're structuring it such as to avoid taxation.

Feel free to comment and I can move swiftly on to what I see from your clumsy and very telling internet footprint. I'm one inch away from dumping your complete web history and the contents of one poorly secured gmail account here for comment, one more bullshit racist post in the forums should piss me off sufficiently do the trick.

Will you promise to eat your words when all I said I'll do is done? Or are you just full of air? Burping instead of farting? Although... it smells a bit shitty to me. Read again "Avoided direct taxation in this country." You are deliberately misconstruing what I wrote to suit your own agenda. Why don't you rather wish me well. That is the decent thing to do.

PS Point out the racist posts to me.

**apprepcen** · 09-Jul-11, 04:06 PM

Originally posted by adrianh

You just got owned by AndyD

You really think so?? What does it mean to be owned? Please explain.

**adrianh** · 09-Jul-11, 05:49 PM

Ou broer, I have learned not to waste too much energy on contests that include a great deal of urination.This is because, when the tongue becomes wet with urine, it become slippery causing it to gather and spout material mostly obtained from an orifice closely situated to the area that generally suspends what is colloquially known as the nut sack.

What does it mean to be owned

This is a philosophical question that can only be answered by the one who was owned. The question is very similar too: What is the meaning of life The answer can only be provided by the one asking the question and thus the answer is only meaningful to the the one asking the question. Which in turn means that the question is rhetorical.

Therefore the answer is whatever you want it to be considering that you are the one asking a rhetorical question. Now the question is this: If a rhetorical question was asked and an answer was given by a second party, does it mean that the rhetorical question was not posed rhetorically or does it mean that the second party answered a question that they were not asked in the first place?

As I said; philosophical questions are very hard to answer and are therefore placed in the same category as questions relating to the guilt of obviously guilty politicians.....

**apprepcen** · 09-Jul-11, 05:57 PM

You typed many words but said nothing of real value to me. I am still new here, so I am still figuring out who to ignore and who to listen to. My ignore list is still empty at this stage, but my gut tells me that it will quite long in the not-to-distant future.

I asked a simple question in the OP, but no-one offered an opinion as to the answer. Like you so eloquently pointed out, There is a lot of pissing going on here.

**adrianh** · 09-Jul-11, 06:22 PM

Ah, so you are new here yet you choose to insult all and sundry and you choose to start pissing contests with the locals - this is not a good idea at all. I honestly couldn't give a rats left testicle who you do or don't choose to ignore.

...but I must admit that I do enjoy reading your posts because you provide for a good laugh to an otherwise productive day spent with intelligent people!

**apprepcen** · 09-Jul-11, 06:27 PM

Originally posted by adrianh

Ah, so you are new here yet you choose to insult all and sundry and you choose to start pissing contests with the locals - this is not a good idea at all. I honestly couldn't give a rats left testicle who you do or don't choose to ignore.

...but I must admit that I do enjoy reading your posts because you provide for a good laugh to an otherwise productive day spent with intelligent people!

Considered yourself ignored. I would prefer if you do the same with me, shithead. You are much too concerned with your balls for my taste. Do you type your posts with your dick in your hand too?

I fully expect to be banned after this post, but I do not really mind.

**adrianh** · 09-Jul-11, 06:46 PM

Quick, go look in the mirror. I am very concerned about your tongue (I think it has turned yellow) You should quickly rinse your mouth with TCP or Handy Andy because it sounds like the tongue has come into contact with the orifice next to the "nut sack" You know, if one leaves the tongue to be yellow for too long, the colouring seeps into the head causing permanent discolouration of the geological structures contained within! So off you go, quickly now, before the geological structures turn the colour of Sulphur

**apprepcen** · 09-Jul-11, 06:46 PM

I joined this forum for civilian advice on how to get a tax clearance certificate. I got that within a few days after following Dave A's advice. He is the sharpest knife in this drawer, unlike the bunch of Capetown bergies who cannot wait to see others join their ranks and shoot down every initiative that might just catapult someone into a league far above what they can even imagine. Unfortunately my perception at this stage is that they are the most active on this forum. Anyway I will not post here anymore. Dave, thank you for your advice. I do not know what your profession is - I guess a CA, but I hope that you are appreciated for your input, because if you resign here, this forum is dead.

**adrianh** · 09-Jul-11, 07:09 PM

First you said that you are going to use logic then you said you are going to ignore me.

Now, you did not ignore me but responded to my post, this means two things:

1. you did not apply logic because you did not do what you said you were going to do, let me expain; if you said the following "if 1+1=2 then I will say that 1+1=2" but what you did was you said "1+1=4" therefore the answer is not reasonable nor valid.
2. You said you were going to ignore me yet you are still speaking to me. This is similar to the rhetorical question conundrum, if you spoke to me then you didn't ignore me, but if I didn't answer you then did you actually spreak to me or was speaking to me and not ignoring me a pure figment of your imagination. Given that I did answer you I believe that the question is a figment of the imagination of the internet and that the answer is the response provided by the internet itself on a quantum level.

Now, if you were using K-logic then none of the above applies because of Heizenberg's Uncertainty Principle as the rule partains to our local regime and I quote "One can not observe classical logic being applied by a member of the party or those that aspire to apply the same logic as they do, because making such an observation would cause the logic that may have been applied revert to K-logic, therefore all observations of logic within the system look as if it is K-logic irrespective of it acutally being classical logic" The implication of course is that no matter what one does when one uses K-logic, although the world may look logical to the observer, it has already collapsed into K-logic.

Then of course we could also discuss the quantum effect that the usage of K-logic has on the 5 dimensional fabric of reality, but I think it better to hold that discussion over for another day.

**wynn** · 11-Jul-11, 12:43 PM

I am sure 'Radovan' applies the same logic to business, only he doesnt buy them out he shoots them.

**Dave A** · 11-Jul-11, 12:56 PM

Looks like some people had a better weekend than others

I hope everyone is done with the personal attacks already.

**AndyD** · 11-Jul-11, 08:03 PM