Maybe you misunderstood my post or perhaps I worded it ambiguously. I was advocating stopping the ridiculous pay increases across the board and rather paying people according to their productivity and ability.
I'm saying that the competent and productive people are not paid their worth because the incompetent are becoming more overpaid with across the board pay hikes.
Apprenticeships cost a fortune and are an investment in the apprentices future output after he/she is qualified. If, after qualifying they aren't payed their worth then they pack up and leave with their qualification and experience then no return is seen on that investment. If apprentices are leaving en mass after qualifying then the whole system is unsustainable.
This is your opinion. I'm sure there's a percentage of the population who fit into every one of those patterns of behavior which you have outlined but lumping all the youth or all adults in one bracket is an inaccurate generalisation.
I'm saying that the competent and productive people are not paid their worth because the incompetent are becoming more overpaid with across the board pay hikes.
Apprenticeships cost a fortune and are an investment in the apprentices future output after he/she is qualified. If, after qualifying they aren't payed their worth then they pack up and leave with their qualification and experience then no return is seen on that investment. If apprentices are leaving en mass after qualifying then the whole system is unsustainable.
This is your opinion. I'm sure there's a percentage of the population who fit into every one of those patterns of behavior which you have outlined but lumping all the youth or all adults in one bracket is an inaccurate generalisation.
Comment