The problem with those hyper-competitive niches (such as electronic goods) is how much can you trust the organic results anyway.
If there's a big budget going into Adwords, you know there's a big budget going into SEO too. And as much as the SEO guys and gals might bemoan it, they're part of the "problem."
Why did Google introduce special tags for online shopping sites?
When Google started adding maps results to search, who jumped on this to get into that valuable above-the-fold territory?
Images?
Video?
And as SEO's bemoan this cras commercialisation, the question rings out:
Perhaps the wrong question. I suspect the question is how could any search engine do things differently, provide relevant results, and still pay the bills?
Like it or not, the results are still giving what searchers are looking for, otherwise they'll be going elsewhere in next to no time.
The customer is still king.
ps - do a search on hd monitor yourself in a number of different search tools and see what your results are.
If there's a big budget going into Adwords, you know there's a big budget going into SEO too. And as much as the SEO guys and gals might bemoan it, they're part of the "problem."
Why did Google introduce special tags for online shopping sites?
When Google started adding maps results to search, who jumped on this to get into that valuable above-the-fold territory?
Images?
Video?
And as SEO's bemoan this cras commercialisation, the question rings out:
Perhaps the wrong question. I suspect the question is how could any search engine do things differently, provide relevant results, and still pay the bills?
Like it or not, the results are still giving what searchers are looking for, otherwise they'll be going elsewhere in next to no time.
The customer is still king.
ps - do a search on hd monitor yourself in a number of different search tools and see what your results are.
Comment