Unfortunately very little chance of that as the current thinking in government seems to be the exact opposite. Consider this by Trevor Manuel yesterday:
Hmm. Well except for the labour hiring and firing, is the situation on the other points that much different here? BTW - Where are the government ministers sending their kids to school?
Anyway, back to main topic -
There was no understanding that labour legislation was hurting employment when times were good. What prospect of them seeing that it's still hurting employment in an "employment recession"?
Maybe if we remind gov that staff are paid out of company profits (before shareholders get their slice come to think of it), the concept might sink in that profit is key to the whole economic engine and people will get off their "profit is sinful" hobbyhorse.
More profits = more jobs.
Less profits = ....
Kinda obvious, really.
Replying to the first reading debate on the Appropriations Bill which he tabled in the house a week ago and which sets out his annual budget spending proposals, Manuel added that the recommendations proposed by the opposition Democratic Alliance's Dion George were like the economic prescriptions which were offered in the US from January 2001 to January 2009 -- the period of the administration of George Bush.
“It's a period during which you have the complete attrition of the state. The unfettered control of markets and the excesses that the world has lived through,” the minister said
He stressed that there has to be a moral dimension to economic policy. “Consider the fact that there are 43 million people there who do not have access to healthcare because they are uninsured,” he said.
“Consider the myriads of people who are just disgorged without much protection beyond a short period of unemployment insurance. Just disgorged, because the labour markets are as free and unregulated as they obtain there. Consider the vast differences between the schools for the rich and schools for the poor.”
from M&G article here
“It's a period during which you have the complete attrition of the state. The unfettered control of markets and the excesses that the world has lived through,” the minister said
He stressed that there has to be a moral dimension to economic policy. “Consider the fact that there are 43 million people there who do not have access to healthcare because they are uninsured,” he said.
“Consider the myriads of people who are just disgorged without much protection beyond a short period of unemployment insurance. Just disgorged, because the labour markets are as free and unregulated as they obtain there. Consider the vast differences between the schools for the rich and schools for the poor.”
from M&G article here
Anyway, back to main topic -
There was no understanding that labour legislation was hurting employment when times were good. What prospect of them seeing that it's still hurting employment in an "employment recession"?
Maybe if we remind gov that staff are paid out of company profits (before shareholders get their slice come to think of it), the concept might sink in that profit is key to the whole economic engine and people will get off their "profit is sinful" hobbyhorse.
More profits = more jobs.
Less profits = ....
Kinda obvious, really.
Comment