Tweet
I think the first part of the post spoje of a caravan.
Presumably there is a loan over that.
Where a lender wants to attach a home, the court looks at many factors, all in an attempt to allow a person to keep their house.
I seem to remember, and I could be wrong, someone argued that a caravan that serves as a home gets the same consideration.
Turning to adrians post - when looking at the list of debts you need to consider what debts are for luxuries.
Luxuries, in my view is anything over our home, neccessary clothes and food. That means TV, phones etc. Many tim3s people hang on to it, defending their action by saying I already paid R2000 so I would be losing that money.
Presumably there is a loan over that.
Where a lender wants to attach a home, the court looks at many factors, all in an attempt to allow a person to keep their house.
I seem to remember, and I could be wrong, someone argued that a caravan that serves as a home gets the same consideration.
Turning to adrians post - when looking at the list of debts you need to consider what debts are for luxuries.
Luxuries, in my view is anything over our home, neccessary clothes and food. That means TV, phones etc. Many tim3s people hang on to it, defending their action by saying I already paid R2000 so I would be losing that money.
Comment