Hi Ian
The problem with the whole saga is that there is no proof of the client i worked
for. Saying that they were unhappy.
As to i submitted evidence to the chairperson of the client praising me about my great work.
The complainant only submitted evidence of a inconsistent attendance sheet.
Which the client would not of done as they would of picked up the errors.
The chairperson relied on hearsay evidence.
What makes it more frustrating for me is that.
The complainant told the chairperson that the client told him that they were unhappy with me on the first occasion when i was apparently absent on the 6 August 2008. The attendance sheet captured an entry of 0:00 total time attended. It captured an entry so which means i was there. Then he changed his statement telling the client told him this on the second occasion when i was absent on the 13 November 2008. This is when i produce my sick certificate but this was dismissed by the chairperson.The attendance sheet shows no entries for that day. Do you see the problem?
That what makes it suspicious
We were about five guys that were on a contractual basis.
I was the second last to join.
Two months working there i was ahead of all four guys including an permanent worker
and two was commended for the excellent work. The clash happened between me and the permanent worker that he i was ahead off. the employee that arrived drunk at work.
Ian as i have gathered. You have to lick you know what to stay there. At my employers and not the client as they have a better working policy there.
I believe fairness not by buying face.
Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.