As usual, I'm skeptical on any benchmarks. But this doesn't look too bad. It may not cover everything that gets done on a web server, but it's something to look at (also, bar charts!)
http://www.webperformance.com/load-t...est-webserver/
As usual, I'm skeptical on any benchmarks. But this doesn't look too bad. It may not cover everything that gets done on a web server, but it's something to look at (also, bar charts!)
http://www.webperformance.com/load-t...est-webserver/
Participation is voluntary.
Alcocks Electrical Services | Alcocks Pest Control & Entomological Services | Alcocks Hygiene Services
I'm fairly confident MS pays far more attention to default settings than the community projects do...
...and MS doesn't have to deal with the inherent problems of obtaining consensus out of a committee of unpaid, maniacal volunteers either.
Participation is voluntary.
Alcocks Electrical Services | Alcocks Pest Control & Entomological Services | Alcocks Hygiene Services
Well if you read their own comment about why they still use Apache: The difference is actually so infinitesimal as to be more than likely swamped by normal latency times. Thus you'd probably not even notice the difference between the fastest & slowest servers in those tested. And thus (for them at least) the overruling factor is: "Which server gives us the features we need?"
Gold is the money of kings; silver is the money of gentlemen; barter is the money of peasants; but debt is the money of slaves. - Norm Franz
And central banks are the slave clearing houses
Apache server
Hey Guys well i think that the Apache server is the most efficient.It is free so it is regularly being customized to best fit the credentials for the best possible web server.Thanks!!
Any differences observed between Apache server for Linux/Unix or for MS-Windows ?
Participation is voluntary.
Alcocks Electrical Services | Alcocks Pest Control & Entomological Services | Alcocks Hygiene Services
Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.