Great, personally I like Seagate ... always have. From my own experience they're the drives with the least trouble. Though as I've mentioned before, I've seen some tests done which actually show the opposite: Seagates having the highest failure rate in data servers, then WD, then best of the lot being Toshibas.
The Toshiba I do have a sample of, which seems to corroborate the test: I had a very old Iomega external 80GB drive (around 9 years old). The casing & USB circuitry has since demolished itself after falling off a cupboard.. So I've stuck the 2.5" Toshiba disc into a SATA port - it still works perfectly.I've got another 250GB Toshiba (around 6 years old) which is the one I replaced recently with a new 3TB - it's now plugged into a Iomega iConnect together with the 80GB using some self-frankensteined Sata-toUSB converters, both still running fine. But even though I've had 100% reliability with these, I don't consider 2 discs statistically significant.
Some WD's I've had previously have all failed, and of the 20 or so Seagates I've had since the 90's I only ever had 1 fail on me (though that was around 2 years ago on a 2TB 3.5" Green Barracuda), the rest are still running, or in a box (the oldest I'm still using 5 years 500GB 2.5").
Thanks! BTW, since you're using it, how easy is it to set up UnRaid using several different sized discs while later swapping / adding new larger discs? With ZFS I had lots of learning to do - the vdev can't be "grown" after first creation (even if you add new larger discs it only uses the original size), only way was to add new vdevs into the zpool. To me that sounded a bit convoluted.
Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.