Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 42

Thread: Ranked #3 in Google!

  1. #31
    Bronze Member dfsa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    166
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 31 Times in 24 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Norri View Post
    One thing I've always liked about being ranked highly for that keyword is it gives me INSTANT "proof" whenever I want to sell SEO.
    I like your thinking there.( SEE SOME PROOF WHAT WE CAN DO ) and put a Search screen shot on your sales page. Gaurentee your conversion on your sales page will step up a few %
    Last edited by Dave A; 25-Jun-12 at 08:27 PM. Reason: format cleanup

  2. #32
    Gold Member Mark Atkinson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    796
    Thanks
    212
    Thanked 150 Times in 117 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    By the sounds of things, you guys are saying "If I happen to rank for that keyword, then cool, it can't hurt," and that pattern of thought is perfectly fine if you have put in no effort to rank.

    Having looked at the website and followed Norri's comments over the past while, it doesn't seem as though that is the case (could be wrong) - hence my comments. It looked like the links and the website were specifically optimised for the word "website" and, should that be the case, then your thinking is a bit flawed because you would get a far higher ROI by having optimised for more targeted keywords with commercial intent.

    My opinion is that you start with the long tail and then end up with the broader keywords as a matter of natural progression, not the other way around. Although in our industry, it could be said that the "long tail" keywords are the more competitive words for that same reason.

  3. #33
    Bronze Member dfsa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    166
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 31 Times in 24 Posts
    I basically answered the reason for the drop in ranking here:

    Quote Originally Posted by dfsa View Post
    Not sure what you tryed with the outsource company, but if it is not fake, you have a PR 4 domain there. You should not have a problem to be at No:1. Your top competitor is wiki and a few weak pages from authority sites.

    You have a landing page for a home page. It scream "I only want pre-sales leads here" The first thing search engines see is the Huge pay button.

    For viral traffic, YES. For SEO no GO

    Before penguin update, Norri was ranked at No:3 After Penguin he dropped to No: 66

    If G found him to have done any sort of spam SEO they would have de-indexed him. In this case they only dropped his ranking. The penguin update is reasonable clear that they want to see valuable content and not a end out sales pitch. Norri's huge pay button is the first thing the search engine see. So in short rank with an good unique content information page and link internally to your sales page. Any traffic other than organic, you can send directly to your sales page, but for the serps stay away from trying to rank your sales page.

  4. #34
    Email problem Rod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    49
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    I have been reading up and I don't think Google would de-index him. They would just make the value of all spammed links, worth absolutely nothing. Thus the huge drop.

  5. #35
    Email problem Rod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    49
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    Other wise it would be too easy to sabotage your competitors by adding them to link directories.

  6. #36
    Gold Member Mark Atkinson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    796
    Thanks
    212
    Thanked 150 Times in 117 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by Rod View Post
    I have been reading up and I don't think Google would de-index him. They would just make the value of all spammed links, worth absolutely nothing. Thus the huge drop.
    100% correct. Google doesn't penalise the sites, they penalise the links to the sites. For the penguin/panda updates anyway.

  7. #37
    Bronze Member dfsa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    166
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 31 Times in 24 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rod View Post
    I have been reading up and I don't think Google would de-index him. They would just make the value of all spammed links, worth absolutely nothing. Thus the huge drop.
    Correct most sites just got punished and had a drop in ranking.

    G did de-index 100 of thousands of sites after penquin if they found the sites linked to link farms, and sindication blogs. Many sites that was connected to the spam sindications got de-indexed also.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rod View Post
    Other wise it would be too easy to sabotage your competitors by adding them to link directories.
    This question was posted to Matt Cutts. They are looking out for any spam fast linking tactics and they ignore that. G is looking intoi adding a tool in webmasters so that site owners can remove these links and not having to contact the sites where the links was posted.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Atkinson View Post
    100% correct. Google doesn't penalise the sites, they penalise the links to the sites. For the penguin/panda updates anyway.
    G always devalued links comming from dodgy low quality sites. They just stepped up the penaltys to be more severe. If you have too many of one type link, then they penalize your site. They want diversity.

    I did do a quick look at Norries link profile on his site and he has around 1200 links, so he did not go out there and spammed. He do however have a good number pointing back from his other sites and from his article directory. It is possible that he got penalised for ip spam. I did not check up on that.

    I also looked at only his top competitor and this site has for sure been spamming a little. This site has over a 6000 link profile. Most sites is not relevant and he has an enormous amount that come from blogspot and non english language. ( So Maybe G like you to spam their own link farm)


    An interesting TOPIC would be: Why do goolge all of a sudden put high value on social signals.? This would be a good debate.

  8. #38
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    22,660
    Thanks
    3,307
    Thanked 2,676 Times in 2,258 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by dfsa View Post
    An interesting TOPIC would be: Why do goolge all of a sudden put high value on social signals.? This would be a good debate.
    For those interested, that debate has been moved here.

  9. #39
    Email problem vieome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    joburg
    Posts
    540
    Thanks
    58
    Thanked 159 Times in 118 Posts
    Blog Entries
    37
    Well Norri to sum it up, it seems a good place to promote your site is to start on social networking sites

  10. #40
    Bronze Member dfsa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    166
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 31 Times in 24 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by vieome View Post
    Well Norri to sum it up, it seems a good place to promote your site is to start on social networking sites
    Correct thinking vieome, what do you think is he doing in the forum. This is being social. Next Norri must put up a facebook fan page. Social, is time consuming, but much targeted and easier to convert into sales.

    Having his page on No:1, well much more hands free and automated.

    Imagine Dave A go on a Four Week holiday stint without his laptop.. This forum will come to a stand still. Social, you must keep at it consistantly.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Google DFP
    By Norri in forum Business Online Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-May-12, 08:00 PM
  2. Matt Cutts - Google 2000 vs Google 2011
    By Dave A in forum Technology Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-Feb-11, 11:49 AM
  3. Google
    By tec0 in forum Technology Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-Sep-10, 12:12 AM
  4. let me google that for you
    By twinscythe12332 in forum Technology Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 20-Apr-09, 01:15 PM
  5. Maria Ramos ranked 14th most powerful businesswoman.
    By Dave A in forum General Business Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-Oct-07, 07:34 AM

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •