Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Cellphone confiscation

  1. #11
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    22,662
    Thanks
    3,307
    Thanked 2,676 Times in 2,258 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    If "confiscate" was changed to "impound", I'd say the idea has merit. Confiscating is a bit too close to legalised theft IMO.

  2. #12
    Bronze Member Fanie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Centurion
    Posts
    117
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
    You can only be fined for talking on a phone, if they confiscate the phone then it is theft !

    You can also only be arrested if they have a warrant for your arrest ! If any police officer says he is going to arrest you without real reason like drunk driving or something else that is a threat to other's lives he must have a warrant to do so.

    Some okes got pulled over allegedly driving too fast, and they were threatened to be arrested. No can do, they can fine them but for an arrest they have to have a warrant !

    http://www.trafficfinestoolkit.co.za/special.php
    Regards
    Fanie

  3. #13
    Platinum Member sterne.law@gmail.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Durban
    Posts
    1,332
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 566 Times in 413 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by Fanie View Post
    You can only be fined for talking on a phone, if they confiscate the phone then it is theft !

    You can also only be arrested if they have a warrant for your arrest ! If any police officer says he is going to arrest you without real reason like drunk driving or something else that is a threat to other's lives he must have a warrant to do so.

    Some okes got pulled over allegedly driving too fast, and they were threatened to be arrested. No can do, they can fine them but for an arrest they have to have a warrant !

    http://www.trafficfinestoolkit.co.za/special.php
    A warrant is NOT always required for arrest. The statutes lay down when an arrest can be affected, most significantly there must be a crime occurring, occurred or enough evidence to suggest will occur and no time for a warrant. A good exmple is if a person is seen in possesion of potential house breaking utensils they may be stopped etc, ect.

    HOWEVER in terms of arrest and more importantly imprisonment(leaving bail applications aside), arrest is an infringment of a fundamental human right, freedom. It is a last resort. Arrest is not a punishment but a method to procure attendance at court. The police will need to show good cause for not releasing you and relying on one of the other methods to procure attendance.
    Anthony Sterne

    www.acumenholdings.co.za
    DISCLAIMER The above is merely a comment in discussion form and an open public arena. It does not constitute a legal opinion or professional advice in any manner or form.

  4. #14
    Bronze Member Fanie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Centurion
    Posts
    117
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
    Hi Anthony,

    Agreed. Many officials unfortunately try to intimidate the public with threats of arrest and jail in an attempt to get something for releasing the victims. It is fairly common practice here.
    Regards
    Fanie

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •