The problem with non-scientific "Truth" is that people call all sorts of things that are unverified true. Another problem with "Truth" is that people consider that lots of things to be true because a leader / company etc says so. I am all for the pursuit of truth, but having said that, the unbiased objective truth.
I must admit that I am a total sceptic and that I am unwilling to accept things at face value. As soon as the human mind is involved in a judgement then the notion of truth becomes obsure. I for one have serious problems with my memory and I am honestly unable to remember many many things. The implication is that I know that I can't trust my own mind / memory. The problem is that I might believe something to be true that may or may not have happened. Given all of this I am very weary of considering other peoples opinions to be "True". The fact that the masses believe something to be true doesn't mean that it is so. The masses believed that the earth was flat, to them it was true.
Maybe I am too ridgid in my thinking given that I look at things from a logical / mechanical point of of view. I find it very hard to look at things from a belief point of view because I see the different sides. One religious group believes this, anoother that, who is right, who is wrong, I don't know, should one side with one or the other, I can't say for sure either.
My dominie, many years ago, once said a great thing to me: he said "You don't have to believe as I do, but at least give me the chance to show you what I believe" I will read your book and try to see the world through your eyes.
Where can I buy the book?
Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.