Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Consumer Act delayed

  1. #1
    Platinum Member sterne.law@gmail.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Durban
    Posts
    1,332
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 566 Times in 413 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Consumer Act delayed

    As expected the Consumer Protection Act final step has been defered.
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Anthony Sterne

    www.acumenholdings.co.za
    DISCLAIMER The above is merely a comment in discussion form and an open public arena. It does not constitute a legal opinion or professional advice in any manner or form.

  2. Thank given for this post:

    AndyD (28-Sep-10), Dave A (28-Sep-10), desA (28-Sep-10)

  3. #2
    Moderator IanF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Jhb
    Posts
    2,679
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked 529 Times in 405 Posts
    Delayed until 31 march 2011.
    We should run a sweep for the date it is finally implemented.
    Only stress when you can change the outcome!

  4. #3
    Gold Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    843
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked 177 Times in 146 Posts
    News24 say that the new Companies Act is being deferred as well. Critically its being deferred to April next year which means another year of unnecessary audit fees for many small PTY Ltds.

    Frustrating

  5. Thanks given for this post:

    Dave A (28-Sep-10)

  6. #4
    Platinum Member desA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    South East Asia
    Posts
    1,023
    Thanks
    512
    Thanked 126 Times in 99 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by IanF View Post
    Delayed until 31 march 2011.
    We should run a sweep for the date it is finally implemented.
    11 March 2031
    In search of South African Technology Nuggets(R), for sale & trading in South East Asia.

  7. #5
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Pretoria
    Posts
    25
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    Hi Anthony,

    Seeing this CPA has been deferred, where does a disgruntled consumer like myself go in the meantime to expose false marketing... Like this one guy, he sells clip on covers for Corsa Bakkies and his website claims it's easy to fit.. he's in Cape Town, I'm in Pretoria, the cover arrives, to my surprise it requires serious heavy duty DIY, I call him to ask for instructions, he tells me I can go to the GM dealers so they can help me. I ended up paying an extra R500 for installation. I want to expose him so the next person doesn't get caught in the trap... Any ideas where I can start?

  8. #6
    Diamond Member AndyD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    4,923
    Thanks
    576
    Thanked 934 Times in 755 Posts
    I think the best mechanism available at the moment would be hellopeter. It's also worthwhile checking this site for reference before you do business with unknown companies especially if they're not in your area.
    _______________________________________________

    _______________________________________________

  9. Thanks given for this post:

    brown (05-Oct-10)

  10. #7
    Full Member Rebel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Ruimsig Gauteng
    Posts
    55
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts

    Consumer Protection Act - Reality at last

    Hi,

    The Consumer Protection Act, 2008, comes into force on 1 April 2011. We will have to deal with this one step by step.

    FIRST THING “MY NAME” - TRADING AS “YOUR NAME”

    The Act will prohibit the use of unregistered business names unless a person trades under his or her own personal full name as recorded in an identity document.

    This means that a person who wants to trade under a business or trading name (being a name that is not registered as a company or CC name or registered otherwise under some law) would have to register that business name under the Consumer Protection Act. The criteria for business names are dealt with in the Act and the process for application for registration would be prescribed in regulations which are currently in the process of being drafted. Such registrations would be the responsibility of the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission as envisaged in the new Companies Act, 2008.

    If we look at the list of businesses we will find lots of names like: “123 cc trading as ABC” : - question to ask: “Is the name “ABC” a registered trading name or just a name picked by the owners?” In future both 123 cc and ABC will have to be registered if the business wants to use either or both.

    EXTRACTS FROM THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 2008

    “CHAPTER 4” - BUSINESS NAMES AND INDUSTRY CODES OF CONDUCT

    Part A

    Business names
    Identification of supplier

    79. (1) A person must not carry on business, advertise, promote, offer to supply or supply any goods or services, or enter into a transaction or agreement with a consumer under any name except—
    (a) the person’s full name as—
    (i) recorded in an identity document or any other recognised identification document, in the case of an individual; or
    (ii) registered in terms of a public regulation, in the case of a juristic person; or
    (b) a business name registered to, and for the use of, that person in terms of section 80, or any other public regulation.

    (2) A person doing anything contemplated in subsection (1) must include the following particulars on any trade catalogue, trade circular, business letter, order for goods, sales record or statement of account that the person issues:
    (a) The name, title or description under which the business is carried on;
    (b) a statement of the primary place at which, or from which, the business is carried on; and
    (c) if the activity is carried on under a business name, the name of the person to whom that business name is registered.

    (3) If a person—
    (a) does anything contemplated in subsection (1) under a name that is not that person’s full name, or a business name registered to that person, the Commission
    may issue a compliance notice to that person, in terms of section 100, requiring the person—
    (i) within a reasonable time, to—
    (aa) apply for registration of the business name in terms of section 80; or
    (bb) discontinue that conduct under that business name; and
    (ii) if the application to register that business name is unsuccessful for any reason contemplated in this Part, to discontinue that conduct under that name within 40 business days after receiving notice of the failure of the application;
    (b) fails to comply with any requirement of subsection (2), the Commission may issue a compliance notice to the person in terms of section 100; or
    (c) does anything contemplated in subsection (1) under a business name that is registered to another person, that other person may apply to the court for an order contemplated in subsection (4).

    (4) The court hearing an application contemplated in subsection (3)(c) may make an order directing a person to stop using a business name within a period, and on any terms, that the court considers just, equitable and expedient in the circumstances.

    Registration of business names

    80. (1) A person may file a notice with the Registrar in the prescribed manner and form, and with payment of the prescribed fee, to—

    (a) register any number of business names being used, or to be used, by that person in carrying on the person’s business;
    (b) register the same business name translated into any number of official languages of the Republic;
    (c) change a registered business name; or
    (d) transfer a registered business name to another person.

    (2) The Registrar must register—
    (a) a business name, or translation or change of a business name, as filed, if it
    satisfies the requirements of section 81; or
    (b) a transfer of a business name, as filed.

    (3) If the Registrar believes on reasonable grounds that a person has applied to register a business name, or a translation or change of a business name, that does not satisfy the
    requirements of section 81—
    (a) the Registrar must notify the applicant accordingly; and
    (b) the procedures set out in the Companies Act, 1973 (Act No. 61 of 1973), for resolving disputed names of companies, read with the changes required by the context, apply to the resolution of the disputed business name.

    (4) If, during the time that a business name is registered to a person, the Registrar, on reasonable grounds, believes that the person has not been carrying on business under that name for a period of at least six months, the Registrar—
    (a) by notice in the prescribed form, may require the person to whom the business name is registered to show cause in the prescribed manner and form why the registration should not be cancelled; and
    (b) may cancel the registration by notice in the prescribed form if the person to whom the business name is registered fails to respond to the notice within the
    prescribed time, or fails to provide—
    (i) satisfactory evidence that the person is conducting business under the registered business name; or
    (ii) a reasonable explanation for not conducting business under that name as noted by the Registrar.

    (5) A person affected by a decision of the Registrar in terms of subsection (4) may apply to the Tribunal to review the determination.

    Criteria for business names

    81. (1) Subject to subsection (2), a business name may comprise words in any language irrespective of whether the words are commonly used or contrived for the
    purpose, together with—
    (a) any letters, numbers or punctuation marks;
    (b) any of the following symbols: +, &, #, @, %, =;
    (c) any other symbol permitted by the regulations made in terms of subsection (3); or
    (d) round brackets used in pairs to isolate any part of the name, alone or in any combination.

    (2) A business name—
    (a) must not be the same as, or confusingly similar to—
    (i) a name of a juristic person incorporated in terms of the Companies Act, 1973 (Act No. 61 of 1973), the Close Corporations Act, 1984 (Act No. 69
    of 1984), or the Co-operatives Act, 2005 (Act No. 14 of 2005);
    (ii) a registered trade mark belonging to another person, or a mark in respect of which an application has been filed in the Republic for registration as
    a trade mark or a well-known trade mark as contemplated in section 35 of the Trade Marks Act, 1993 (Act No. 194 of 1993), unless the applicant
    for registration of the mark as a business name either—
    (aa) is the registered owner or applicant for registration of the mark; or
    (bb) has been granted a licence to that mark; or
    (iii) a mark, word or expression, the use of which is restricted or protected in terms of the Merchandise Marks Act, 1941 (Act No. 17 of 1941), except
    to the extent permitted in terms of that Act;
    (b) must not falsely imply or suggest, or be such as would reasonably mislead, a person to believe incorrectly that the business—
    (i) is part of, or associated with, any other person or entity;
    (ii) is an organ of state or a court, or is operated, sponsored, supported or endorsed by the State or by any organ of state or a court;
    (iii) is owned, managed or conducted by persons having any particular educational designation or who are regulated persons or entities;
    (iv) is owned, operated, sponsored, supported or endorsed by, or enjoys the patronage of—
    (aa) any foreign state, head of state, head of government, government or administration or any department of such a government or
    administration; or
    (bb) any international organisation; or
    (c) must not include any words, expression or symbol that, in isolation or in context within the name, fall into the category of expression contemplated in
    section 16(2) of the Constitution.

    (3) The Minister may prescribe additional commonly recognised symbols for use in business names, as contemplated in subsection (1)(c).

    SCHEDULE 2

    Relief from requirement to register business names

    5. (1) Section 79(1), (2) and (3)(a) and (b), and sections 80 and 81, do not take effect until a date determined by the Minister by notice in the Gazette, which date must be at
    least one year following the general effective date.

    (2) The Minister must publish a notice contemplated in subitem (1) at least six months before the date on which that notice is to take effect.

    (3) The Commission may not take any action to enforce—

    (a) section 79(1) at any time against a person for the use of a business name, if that person—

    (i) had registered that business name before the general effective date in terms of any public regulation other than a repealed law; or

    (ii) was actively conducting business under that business name for a period of at least one year before the date on which section 79 took effect.

    (4) Any business name that, as of the general effective date, was registered in terms of any repealed law, must be regarded as having been registered in terms of this Act, as of
    the effective date.

    (5) The register of business names, as maintained by the Companies and Intellectual Property Registration Office in terms of any of the repealed laws, is continued as the
    register of business names contemplated in this Act.

    On our website you will find the CPA and the published regulations: www.rebels.co.za

  11. Thanks given for this post:

    Dave A (19-Feb-11)

Similar Threads

  1. M Ntuli on Consumer Protection Act
    By I Robot in forum Consumer Protection Act Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-Mar-10, 01:22 PM
  2. K Motlanthe approves Consumer Protection Bill
    By I Robot in forum General Regulatory Compliance Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-Jun-09, 09:07 PM

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •