Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 71

Thread: The arms deal corruption issue

  1. #21
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    22,648
    Thanks
    3,304
    Thanked 2,676 Times in 2,257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    For anyone interested, here is the full NPA statement as to why they are not prosecuting Jacob Zuma.

    For those who would prefer something shorter, here we go:
    The representations submitted by the legal representatives pertained to the following issues:

    The substantive merits;

    The fair trial defences;

    The practical implications and considerations of continued prosecution; and

    The policy aspects militating against prosecution.


    I need to state upfront that we could not find anything with regard to the first three grounds that militate against a continuation of the prosecution, and I therefore do not intend to deal in depth with those three grounds.

    I will focus on the fourth ground, which I consider to be the most pertinent for purposes of my decision. I will now deal with the policy aspects militating against the prosecution.
    The statement then quotes numerous legal precedents and then transcripts of conversations that indicate abuse of process. This relates particularly to the timing of placing the charges against Zuma.

    I don't think the precedents quoted do much to support the argument to drop the charges (in fact they seem to infer the exact opposite), but the transcripts certainly give evidence of partisan parties within the NPA and DSO - definitely not a healthy situation.

    From there we get to the conclusion. And I'd like to focus on this bit:
    In the light of the above, I have come to the difficult conclusion that it is neither possible nor desirable for the NPA to continue with the prosecution of Mr Zuma.

    It is a difficult decision because the NPA has expended considerable resources on this matter, and it has been conducted by a committed and dedicated team of prosecutors and investigators who have handled a difficult case with utmost professionalism and who have not been implicated in any misconduct.

    Let me also state for the record that the prosecution team itself had recommended that the prosecution should continue even if the allegations are true, and that it should be left to a court of law to decide whether to stop the prosecution.

    However, I believe that the NPA has a special duty, as one of the guardians of the constitution and the Bill of Rights, to ensure that its conduct is at all times beyond reproach.
    And so Mokotedi Mpshe paints himself with his own brush. I would suggest that the Director has argued against himself.

    Is his dropping of the charges against Jacob Zuma beyond reproach?
    Especially after arguing so eloquently that the NPA must pursue justice without fear or favour.

    He freely concedes there are no mitigating circumstances i.r.o. the substantive merits, the fair trial defences and the practical implications and considerations of continued prosecution.

    So we are left with his embarrassment. Isn't embarrassment a form of fear?

    Now here is the kicker -
    How can we ever see Director Mpshe's interpretation of justice tested in court?
    Because let's face it, who's left to bring the charge?

    If it was such a difficult decision, he should not have appointed himself as final arbiter in the matter and followed the advice of his prosecution team - and let the courts decide.

    As the Director says, the NPA is one of the guardians of the constitution and Bill of Rights, not the final guardian.
    Last edited by Dave A; 06-Apr-09 at 03:28 PM.

  2. #22
    Silver Member Graeme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    253
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    "Cry the beloved country"

  3. #23
    just me duncan drennan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    2,642
    Thanks
    119
    Thanked 94 Times in 77 Posts
    I'm angry. I'm very angry.

    With the last week of wrangling I had already prepared myself for this, and wasn't surprised when the charges were dropped. What I was surprised by was how angry I got. I'm not even that angry about the decision, but rather about the process the resulted in this decision and the implications it has.

    I'm angry that we have a one set of corrupt leaders taking over from another set of corrupt leaders. It has become quite clear that our government is not at all concerned with corruption. If they were we would have a whole different set of people in parliament.

    I'm angry that we live in a society that is okay with this, a society which will continue to vote for a corrupt government – a government which is effectively stealing the food from their mouths, a government which will spend billions on useless weaponry to gain 4x4's and better houses rather than find ways to ensure that people have access to food, water and health care.

    I am angry that there are companies and people who are more than willing to offer bribes and participate in the dance of corruption for their own selfish gains.

    I'm angry that I live in a place where people come begging at my door for food and money, that I turn them away, and that this is acceptable. I am unhappy with the choices that I make in this regard (and that those choices are considered acceptable), and I am angry the people in high places concern themselves more with opportunistic gain than restoring dignity to broken people.

    I am angry that after 15 years the opposition parties have not managed to establish themselves as viable/meaningful/believable options for the vast majority of our country's citizens and that people would choose not to vote instead of voting for an opposition party.

    I am angry that people are stupid enough to choose to boycott voting rather than vote for something better or at least against what is not working. I am angry that this attitude has become ingrained into our society and that this works in the favour of the ruling party.

    I am angry that I work hard, pay my taxes, do my best to produce things that add value to my clients' businesses and as a result to the country and that all of my hard work is undermined by the actions of corrupt and selfish people.

    Today I feel like a second–class citizen – not because of race or class – but because of ethics and values that I fail to see reflected in our society.
    [SIGPIC]Engineer Simplicity[/SIGPIC]
    Turn ideas into products | The Art of Engineering blog

  4. #24
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    22,648
    Thanks
    3,304
    Thanked 2,676 Times in 2,257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    This is what makes me angry:
    ANC treasurer-general Mathews Phosa said the NPA had finally seen the light.

    "We have always said Zuma is innocent, and today it was the NPA who said it. We say to the NPA: at last you have seen the light, you have finally seen the truth," Phosa said.
    from M&G story here
    There are times when I wonder if JZ is the real problem here

    Anyway - it seems both the DA and ID are investigating pursuing the matter rather vigorously.
    Last edited by Dave A; 06-Apr-09 at 10:16 PM.

  5. #25
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    South Arica
    Posts
    379
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
    Well you are innocent till proven guilty. Personally I feel cheated because all the complications and in the end everything about this JZ thing just feels fake...

    However I did expected to see this outcome. I think a lot of us did. However JZ will always have this stigma glooming over him. And you are right JZ is not the problem here. The system is the problem. Face it Politicians in Africa is untouchable no matter how controversial they may be. I also lost faith in our court system because clearly money was just too great an adversary. Now the road is paved therefore others will follow... I lower my head in shame.

  6. #26
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    22,648
    Thanks
    3,304
    Thanked 2,676 Times in 2,257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Yolanda Young, ANC national executive member, said there was a need for a major clean up of the justice system, saying it was full of people who abused their positions.
    Now this is where I get really nervous.

    Obviously Yolanda is right - but it was the ANC machinery that deployed these people. Now they are going to clean house and be trusted to put in people who won't abuse their positions?

    Look at the failure to reinstate Pikoli, a decision that has proved key to the NPA dropping the Zuma charges. Was that done in the best interests of an independent NPA? Or was that political interference to keep a man out who has clearly demonstrated his willingness to act without fear or favour?

  7. #27
    Gold Member garthu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Midrand
    Posts
    595
    Thanks
    39
    Thanked 65 Times in 55 Posts
    I think we all angry! Worried, afraid of consequences here. If anything, take at least this one positive issue away. A poll conducted by IOL has come back that 12% of people feeling good about this and Zuma... (crazy idiots of little perception and ANC beneficiaries no doubt) but the rest are sorely disappointed and feel that he is unsuitable now as a leader, even saw a few comments from people claiming to be "die hard ANC activists" saying they are disappointed.

    It really is becoming possible that so much damage is being done, that they may actually do themselves in here.... hang on to that thought as a little positivity. It really could result in something!
    Garth

    Electric fence Installation : www.midrand-electronics.co.za
    Free Classified Adds : www.bgone.co.za

  8. #28
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    South Arica
    Posts
    379
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
    See the scorpions are a good example of what the ANC can do. The moment they pointed out corrupted ANC members they were taken down. See I will always come back to my point and that is law is no longer law it is what the ANC say it is! Because they are government they expect immunity and will have immunity. The truth is that corruption is a perk and they will use it to benefit themselves. So the question is not government but the system that governs government. That system is failing the country right now with effects unknown... If JZ becomes president and stays president after the election what country will invest in us? If the UN had any moral standing they will not do business with us and boycott the living hell out of us. But if they do business with us... I think you know what that means and what it symbolises.

  9. #29
    just me duncan drennan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    2,642
    Thanks
    119
    Thanked 94 Times in 77 Posts
    Here is the logical reasoning that many people had hoped for, but we did not see.

    What should happen is that Mr McCarthy and Bulelani Ngcuka should be investigated to find out whether they breached the NPA act which prohibits interference in its work. Mr Zuma and his lawyer, Mr Hulley should also be investigated because they had in their possession recordings which were criminally handed over to them and they might well be guilty as accomplices in the commission of a crime that carries a ten year prison sentence.

    Third, if one tries o fit in the reasoning of the NPA into the prosecuting policy – which unlike precedent from colonial Britain the NPA is actually legally bound by – it is difficult to see how a decision not to charge Mr Zuma under these circumstances can be justified in relation to this prosecution policy.
    [SIGPIC]Engineer Simplicity[/SIGPIC]
    Turn ideas into products | The Art of Engineering blog

  10. #30
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    South Arica
    Posts
    379
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
    True but the thing is JZ is government and nothing that government do is ever illegal! No! It is always misunderstood in some strange obscure way... there are no criminals in government just a lot of misunderstood people with strange ways of getting more money...

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. The SASOL BEE deal
    By Dave A in forum BEE and Employment Equity Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-Nov-08, 07:01 PM
  2. Trade and Industry on Sasol's BEE (Black Economic Empowerment) deal
    By I Robot in forum BEE and Employment Equity Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 14-Sep-07, 05:12 PM
  3. Mbeki: All is well.
    By Dave A in forum South African Politics Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-Feb-07, 09:24 AM

Tags for this Thread

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •