Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Arbitration hearing without Employer being present

  1. #1
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Arbitration hearing without Employer being present

    Today I was at the bargaining council for my arbitration hearing and the employer did not send a representative. The commissioner decided to proceed with the hearing and my attorney presented the evidence that I was unfairly dismissed and that the disciplinary hearing was unfair. The commissioner appears to have accepted all our evidence and said that he will issue me with a certificate outlining my award. So it seems that I have won this case. My question is what will the employer do once he is notified of the outcome, will he apply for a rescission and delay the process. I suspect the company will use whatever means they have to to avoid paying out an award.

  2. #2
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    22,648
    Thanks
    3,304
    Thanked 2,676 Times in 2,257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Did you not ask for reinstatement?

  3. #3
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Hi there,

    No I could not, the company has new owners and since my dismissal he has dismissed a few more for stupid reasons. It was said that he does not want the old staff near his building.

  4. #4
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    22,648
    Thanks
    3,304
    Thanked 2,676 Times in 2,257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Not much more you can do than take it step by step.
    Good to hear you've got legal counsel to help you through.

  5. #5
    Diamond Member Justloadit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    3,480
    Thanks
    134
    Thanked 695 Times in 593 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Not sure what situation arose with the new owners. Generally, if the business is sold as an ongoing concern, then the new owner must take over the staff, and the employment continues as if there there has been no break in the employees status.

    What I have done in the past, is that I get the old owner to retrench the staff as part of the sale, and they get paid according to the number of years of service. I then interview and employ the staff as new staff, and they start a new employment from that day forward.

    If the new owner has dismissed a number of employees, then it may mean that the new owner purchased the business as an ongoing concern. The new owner dismissing staff on a whim falls under an unfair dismissal, and will then fall under the LRA and as such falls under the CCMA for mediation and arbitration. The fact that the new owner did not attend the arbitration meeting, places the new owner in a bad situation, and he may ignore the recommendation of the CCMA commissioner.

    This will require you you take the case further, and to the labour court. If the new owner does not attend, then the a number of issues arise.
    One of them being contempt of court, and the second, usually the judge, immediately issues an order for the owner to immediately pay what s due to you. In the case the new owner ignores this order, then a command is sent to the sheriff of the court to attach assets to the value of the payment, and if the owner still does not pay, then the attached assets are sold to raise the capital.

    The problem is that this action can take up to a year or more.

    So find a new job, but continue with the proceedings.
    Victor - Knowledge is a blessing or a curse, your current circumstances make you decide!
    Solar pumping, Solar Geyser & Solar Security lighting solutions - www.microsolve.co.za

  6. #6
    Silver Member Greig Whitton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    338
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 105 Times in 86 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Justloadit View Post
    What I have done in the past, is that I get the old owner to retrench the staff as part of the sale, and they get paid according to the number of years of service. I then interview and employ the staff as new staff, and they start a new employment from that day forward.
    Out of curiosity, how would you justify the retrenchments in this scenario? Presumably this is a non-issue if all of the employees are on board with the plan. But what if some are resistant? (e.g. if they are concerned that they may not be re-employed as promised)

    Founder of Growth Surge - Helping entrepreneurs create more wealth and enjoy more freedom.

  7. #7
    Diamond Member Justloadit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    3,480
    Thanks
    134
    Thanked 695 Times in 593 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Greig Whitton View Post
    Out of curiosity, how would you justify the retrenchments in this scenario? Presumably this is a non-issue if all of the employees are on board with the plan. But what if some are resistant? (e.g. if they are concerned that they may not be re-employed as promised)
    What does a company owner do if he closes the company?
    I also make no promises, as I have found from experience, that there is a lot dead wood, and undesirable employees who influence the rest.
    Victor - Knowledge is a blessing or a curse, your current circumstances make you decide!
    Solar pumping, Solar Geyser & Solar Security lighting solutions - www.microsolve.co.za

  8. #8
    Silver Member Greig Whitton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    338
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 105 Times in 86 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Justloadit View Post
    What does a company owner do if he closes the company?
    Except the owner isn't actually closing the business; he's selling it. So how does this actually work? Would the owner claim that he is closing the business (as a way of justifying the retrenchments) while actually proceeding with a sale? If so, wouldn't this incur the risk of retrenched employees who aren't re-employed hearing about the sale and claiming unfair dismissal?

    Founder of Growth Surge - Helping entrepreneurs create more wealth and enjoy more freedom.

  9. #9
    Diamond Member Justloadit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    3,480
    Thanks
    134
    Thanked 695 Times in 593 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    There is a difference in buying a business or buying the books.

    When you buy a business you buy the liabilities, even if you are not aware of them.
    If it is not a public company, you do not have to buy the company, as there is only a business owner, which is the majority of the cases.
    So the only safe way to get involved is that you buy the books, and effectively the business is closed.
    The current owner is liable for all claims against the company, and one of them is staff.
    The company is closing, so retrenchment is the only option to address any staff claims.

    The fact that the purchaser continues in the same space, does not mean that the new owner must employ the retrenched staff.
    In these situations, there is dead wood staff, and other staff which influences production and through put.
    Victor - Knowledge is a blessing or a curse, your current circumstances make you decide!
    Solar pumping, Solar Geyser & Solar Security lighting solutions - www.microsolve.co.za

  10. Thanks given for this post:

    Greig Whitton (02-Sep-16)

  11. #10
    Silver Member Greig Whitton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    338
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 105 Times in 86 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Justloadit View Post
    There is a difference in buying a business or buying the books.
    Makes perfect sense - thanks for clarifying! Definitely something I will bear in mind for some of my clients who are planning to exit in the future.

    (I misunderstood your original post - I thought you were referencing a business sale as a going concern; not a sale of the assets and subsequent closure)

    Founder of Growth Surge - Helping entrepreneurs create more wealth and enjoy more freedom.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. [Question] Arbitration Hearing
    By shiebas in forum Labour Relations and Legislation Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-Jul-13, 07:39 AM
  2. [Question] Refered to arbitration
    By kenhkph01 in forum Labour Relations and Legislation Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 23-Jan-13, 07:35 AM
  3. Lovely news years day present from Pick n Pay
    By nkawit in forum Business Finance Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 17-Jan-12, 10:45 PM
  4. [Article] Arbitration Stage Procedures
    By BBBEE_CompSpec in forum Labour Relations and Legislation Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27-Nov-09, 11:47 PM

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •