Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Bank Charges

  1. #1
    Silver Member Graeme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    253
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts

    Bank Charges

    Bank Charges - the "Aha!" Factor

    A while ago, part of our vocabulary included the "Aha!" factor; used, for example, when some calculated practice of maximising profits by giving the locked-in client a screwing was believed to exist.

    An article in the latest issue of FINWEEK presenting the results of a rather fascinating forensic investigation into bank charges reminded me of this. It turns out that there is a Dallas-based consultancy called Carreker which entered the South African market about five years ago, offering its services to the Big Four banks in helping them to raise their "non-interest revenue". According to FINWEEK, Carreker's website states, in consultants' gobbledegook, "Carreker's Revenue Enhancement practice helps financial institutions meet their revenue and customer relationship objectives through a carefully staged sequence of emerging best practice opportunities. Tailored to the unique needs of your organisation, these opportunities are timed at a cadence to build long-term, sustained benefits and growth." All of the S.A. Big Four admit to having had various degrees of engagement with Carreker.

    Says a former banker; "They (Carreker) go around the world looking at global best practice and when they enter new territories basically advise new clients on fees they hadn't previously considered." Best practice!

    "Aha!"
    Last edited by Dave A; 26-Jun-08 at 11:36 AM.

  2. #2
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    22,646
    Thanks
    3,304
    Thanked 2,676 Times in 2,257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    I'm surprised they need external consultants. Our banks are pretty innovative on the fees front already.

  3. #3
    Silver Member Graeme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    253
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts

    The Sub-Prime Crisis - more

    You know what it is like when you turn over a stone and all sorts of things scurry about, blinking in the light of day. As the American Sub-Prime scandal proceeds, more and more dirty washing is emerging from their financial system.

    The latest in a quote from "The Economist": "For those who stop short of stuffing their mattress with banknotes, money market funds are meant to be the next best thing. They invest their clients' money in supposedly safe and liquid short-term instruments. But as America's mortgage malaise has spread with shocking alacrity from one corner of the credit markets to another, even these staid creatures have been sent into spasms."

    Some of these money market investments have been in "collateralised debt obligations" (CDO's) and it now turns out that the "assets" backing this paper are comprised not only of mortgages of dubious value, but also "assets" such as credit card receivables! American ratings agencies (Moody, Fitch, et al) which have been issuing gradings of their investment value are now reported to be hurriedly re-evaluating many of these.

    When the day of reckoning arrives, and American politicians will see that it does, I believe that these ratings agencies may well become the subject of those terrifying "class action" lawsuits that Americans are so fond of; but this time for damages running into figures that are normally dealt with by astronomers.

    Most of my spare cash is in South African money market funds, which I always thought of as ultra safe, but I am now beginning to wonder what tricks they might be getting up to here - monkey see, monkey do. I don't believe that we have a mortgage-backed securities problem here, the S A Reserve Bank would have been on to that one, but one does wonder to what extent the Reserve bank is looking at the safety of SA money market funds' investments. Some reassurance by Mboweni would be a very good thing. Cash has been pouring into these funds as many S A investors bail out of equities.
    Last edited by Dave A; 26-Jun-08 at 11:40 AM.

  4. #4
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    6
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Graeme View Post
    Bank Charges - the “Aha!” Factor

    A while ago, part of our vocabulary included the “Aha!” factor; used, for example, when some calculated practice of maximising profits by giving the locked-in client a screwing was believed to exist.

    An article in the latest issue of FINWEEK presenting the results of a rather fascinating forensic investigation into bank charges reminded me of this. It turns out that there is a Dallas-based consultancy called Carreker which entered the South African market about five years ago, offering its services to the Big Four banks in helping them to raise their “non-interest revenue“. According to FINWEEK, Carreker’s website states, in consultants’ gobbledegook, “Carreker’s Revenue Enhancement practice helps financial institutions meet their revenue and customer relationship objectives through a carefully staged sequence of emerging best practice opportunities. Tailored to the unique needs of your organisation, these opportunities are timed at a cadence to build long-term, sustained benefits and growth.” All of the S.A. Big Four admit to having had various degrees of engagement with Carreker.

    Says a former banker; “They (Carreker) go around the world looking at global best practice and when they enter new territories basically advise new clients on fees they hadn’t previously considered.” Best practice!

    “Aha!”

    Collectively, the Major Banks in South Africa extort about R25 Million Per Day
    with Hidden, Obscure and Hide & Seek Bank Charges.

  5. #5
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    22,646
    Thanks
    3,304
    Thanked 2,676 Times in 2,257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    I'm going to be pretty interested in the final report of the banking competition inquiry. I saw one of the folks from the inquiry (forget his name right now) on SABC2 the other day and about the only comment that really stood out was "It's complicated."

    Yeah - I was so surprised. After all, obfuscation is one of the tools of concealment.

    The good news is we're not likely to see one of the major banks collapse any time soon. The bad news - What regulatory changes would really improve the situation? Savvy financial types are the least likely folks to cut their own throats by going to war on the pricing of services front.

    What is needed is real competition - and how do you regulate new service providors of the weight needed into the equation and still weave in all the political priorities that this government wants into any new sizeable venture?

  6. #6
    Silver Member Graeme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    253
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts

    Bank Charges

    Oh I don't think we can ever win; not for so long as the Govt. keeps making non-economic socialist demands that the banks help the "homeless". We can only shrug our shoulders, concede that we are on an adversarial relationship with them, and regard them always with the deepest suspicion. Fortunately, greedy, chiselling banks make wonderful copy for journalists; something for which we should be very grateful.
    Last edited by Dave A; 26-Jun-08 at 11:37 AM.

  7. #7
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    22,646
    Thanks
    3,304
    Thanked 2,676 Times in 2,257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Well, the report is finally out. Judging from share price reactions, it wasn't too bad for the banks. Probably the most interesting recommendation is a cap of R5.00 in bank charges for unmet debit orders.

    I found this snippet enlightening, though.
    It was apparent that the "legacy of discriminatory laws and practices of the past remains a challenge for the South African banking sector", said the panel.

    "The South African banking landscape continues to reflect the fact that the majority of South Africans only enjoy limited access to banking facilities, with poor communities being neglected."

    As an example, the panel cited the disparity in service provided to different communities: wealthy Sandton had 59 bank branches servicing 130 000 people, compared with one formal bank branch serving 175 000 people in predominantly poor Alexandra.
    full report from Business Report here
    You have to wonder about the level of business acumen that might be lurking in the panel.

    How do you pay for the expenses of having a bank branch?

    Does the amount of fees and interest earned relate to the number of people in the area, or the amount of money flowing through the accounts?

    And then the panel also wants the banks to adopt a direct cost related fee model? What's wrong with this picture?

  8. #8
    Moderator IanF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Jhb
    Posts
    2,679
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked 529 Times in 405 Posts
    Dave
    The one recommendation I heard about on the radio was to make it easier to cancel debit orders by just phoning. The abuse I have seen with debit orders is incredible. I even reported a company to my bank as they agreed to not debit me i still went and put a stop payment on it. Then it came through under a different name so I got the bank to reverse it. A year later they phoned me and asked for proof that I cancelled.
    I swore at the person and told them to go away in short movements. Companies like that should not be able to use the facility.
    Only stress when you can change the outcome!

  9. #9
    Diamond Member Blurock's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Durban
    Posts
    4,150
    Thanks
    758
    Thanked 885 Times in 734 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7
    Hi Greame,
    I believe our money market funds are pretty safe due to our status as near banana republic and exclusion from world sub prime markets. Things may have changed since, but I do not think there is reason for concern.

  10. #10
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,346
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 254 Times in 209 Posts
    i applied for a small increase on my overdraft...knowing thw bank would give it to me...because i reduced it a year or back to a manageble amount...and just as i expected the interest rate was the key factor..they increased it by 2 % not just for the addition but the whole amount so now if i go R100 into my overdraft i pay 20 % where as i was only paying 18 % last week...they have me by the balls until i complete 2 projects then they i should be in a position to remove my entire facility this time....

    something else which really burns my butt...i confront the bussiness bank manager about my charges....so the reply is why dont you get a bussiness credit card then you dont get charged all the little fees...just R100 per year for a cervice fee...so my next question....why didnt you tel me about this 5 years ago i could have saved thousands....the response...you never asked...standard bank motto...we will scr*w you until you ask...dont expect us to advise you on ways to save money we are here to make money...and bring your million from the lotto we will loose it for you as fast as you won it....eeeeeish

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Telkom VAT charges
    By duncan drennan in forum General Business Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 20-Jun-07, 09:21 AM
  2. New Standard Bank internet banking interface.
    By Dave A in forum General Business Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 14-May-07, 05:24 PM
  3. Suggestions for a low cost bank account
    By duncan drennan in forum General Business Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 14-May-07, 02:35 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 22-Mar-07, 06:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •