Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Speeding Fines

  1. #1
    Silver Member Graeme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    253
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts

    Speeding Fines

    Speeding on bridges

    I recently received a fine for speeding (82 km/h) on a very long, wide bridge near where I live. The speed limit there is 60km/h but everyone does 80 - 90 across that bridge (no excuse).

    Folk are now telling me that I should contest the fine because speed determination by tripod-mounted camera equipment (probably on the approach to the bridge) is not valid because a bridge is a “moving structure”. I must say that I have noticed that there is discernable vibration on a bridge when a heavy vehicle goes past.

    I am not terribly fussed about this, regarding the occasional speeding fine (R400) as part of the cost of running a motor car, like toll roads and punctures.
    But as a matter of interest could I ask, Duncan and Eugene (Engineering and Law), and any others; do you have an opinion on this? Would the vibration on a bridge be sufficient to invalidate the speed determination, or is this more in the nature of an urban legend?

  2. #2
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    22,648
    Thanks
    3,304
    Thanked 2,676 Times in 2,257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    I seem to recall there was a jurisdiction issue around bridges, but that could easily be another urban legend.

    The other point that rings a bell was that the measuring device could not be mounted on a bridge - due to that same vibration issue you mentioned.

    (Definitely not legal advice - just stuff I've heard along the way).

  3. #3
    just me duncan drennan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    2,642
    Thanks
    119
    Thanked 94 Times in 77 Posts
    The movement of the bridge must influence the measurement somehow, but I can't even guess to what extent (I imagine unnoticeable, but I could be wrong). There must be some sort of manual which says that speed measurements are only allowed under such and such conditions, and logs must be kept and so on. Not sure where to get a copy of that though...
    [SIGPIC]Engineer Simplicity[/SIGPIC]
    Turn ideas into products | The Art of Engineering blog

  4. #4
    Silver Member Eugene's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Somerset West
    Posts
    297
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    When I was employed by the Department of Justice as prosecutor (many moons ago) I can recall a circular from the Attorney General (nowadays the Director of Public Prosecutions) that they were not allowed to affix the tripod on a bridge or even the window of the patrol car which quite often happened. If they hace changed the ruling, I don't know, but will try and find out and let you know.

  5. #5
    Silver Member Eugene's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Somerset West
    Posts
    297
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    I found this interesting piece of info regarding the general conditions for prosecution with regard to speed measurements:

    http://www.speedtraps.co.za/docs/Gui...easurement.pdf

  6. #6
    Silver Member Graeme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    253
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Eugene - thanks for your trouble. Do you know who issued the document?

    Kind regards, Graeme.

  7. #7
    Silver Member Eugene's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Somerset West
    Posts
    297
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    No idea - I see it is marked anonymous, but it bears a familiar resemblence to the prosecutor notes I have.... suppose they are not meant to be public knowledge.

  8. #8
    Email problem
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    While you are on the topic, did you notice on the highways there are an 80km board on account of road works near almost all of the cameras, and no road works for days? But when you get your ticket you apparently drove 100km on an 80km speed zone.... On the highway?!!!!

  9. #9
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    22,648
    Thanks
    3,304
    Thanked 2,676 Times in 2,257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    About the best way to get tail-ended on a freeway is to drive at 80kmph on those sections.

    Scary.

Similar Threads

  1. Can driving under the influence be considered organised crime?
    By Dave A in forum South African Politics Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 15-Nov-06, 07:01 AM

Tags for this Thread

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •