Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: buying a business: revenue lower than when negotiating

  1. #1
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    East Rand
    Posts
    44
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts

    buying a business: revenue lower than when negotiating

    hi

    Recently bought a business. Will take ownership in 2 weeks time.

    while negotiating price (6 weeks ago), seller confirmed in writing the revenue and contracted customer base at the time. This week we rechecked the latest numbers, and it is about 25% less (both revenue and contracted customers. contract is term based but with exit clause). apparently a number of clients exercised the exit clause when they heard about transfer of ownership.

    i want to hold seller to the agreed number of contracts, but there is really nothing seller can do in remaining time to resign 25% of revenue, so can i renegotiate purchase price or should i walk away and loose a significant deposit. we are convinced we can rebuild the lost client base within 4 to 6 months.

    any ideas

  2. #2
    Silver Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    durban
    Posts
    419
    Thanks
    128
    Thanked 61 Times in 52 Posts
    Have you signed a purchase/sale agreement? Are there any clauses stating something to the effect that seller makes no representation as to revenue/turnover etc.

    i will simply not walk away. it might not be as simple as just losing the deposit, the seller can hold u responsible for balance of the purchase price.

    Everything depends on what is contained in the agreement. it appears obvious that you have not consulted an attorney. perhaps this might be the time to do so

  3. #3
    Platinum Member sterne.law@gmail.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Durban
    Posts
    1,332
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 566 Times in 413 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7
    Did he disclose the exit clause options?
    Anthony Sterne

    www.acumenholdings.co.za
    DISCLAIMER The above is merely a comment in discussion form and an open public arena. It does not constitute a legal opinion or professional advice in any manner or form.

  4. Thanks given for this post:

    Dave A (23-Jul-14)

  5. #4
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    22,648
    Thanks
    3,304
    Thanked 2,676 Times in 2,257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Another suggestion that might be worth exploring -

    Quote Originally Posted by Leonp View Post
    while negotiating price (6 weeks ago), seller confirmed in writing the revenue and contracted customer base at the time.
    Ask for the last 12 months VAT returns. If the seller was foolish enough to misrepresent their performance, the VAT returns often show this up pretty well.

  6. #5
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    East Rand
    Posts
    44
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
    thanks all

    The purchase agreement shows the numbers at the time of negotiation, but no exit clause and no confirmation or negation re maintaining those numbers. The seller has committed to investigate the original numbers vs what we have now, but has indicated she is not going to take responsibility for any discrepancy. Our gut feel is we were inexperienced going into this and should have tied this clearly into the agreement. We may be able to enforce this legally but it will take time and money and probably destroy the business anyway, so given our confidence to recover it by year end, i think were going to pay some school fees and live with it.

  7. #6
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    East Rand
    Posts
    44
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave A View Post
    Another suggestion that might be worth exploring -


    Ask for the last 12 months VAT returns. If the seller was foolish enough to misrepresent their performance, the VAT returns often show this up pretty well.
    Hi Dave. yes we checked this and it was fine until 3 months ago. im sure it will show a different picture now.

    also, what we've realized, is that where clients choose to exit the contract, they get to pay and exit fee. off course the seller will just take this fee now as it doesn't affect her later, i.e its free cash for seller now and we carry the burden as buyer

  8. #7
    Moderator IanF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Jhb
    Posts
    2,679
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked 529 Times in 405 Posts
    Some businesses are sold on the basis of commission on sales for the next few years payable out of the sales. That can negate this.
    Only stress when you can change the outcome!

  9. #8
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Had enough
    Posts
    3,358
    Thanks
    114
    Thanked 213 Times in 201 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave A View Post
    Another suggestion that might be worth exploring -


    Ask for the last 12 months VAT returns. If the seller was foolish enough to misrepresent their performance, the VAT returns often show this up pretty well.

    This is a very good way to find out a lot about the company when you compare vat returns to the turnover they say they are doing etc etc etc.

  10. #9
    Gold Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Vanderbijlpark
    Posts
    886
    Thanks
    83
    Thanked 381 Times in 298 Posts
    I have personal experience with this type of thing; but in my case it was deliberate or careless misrepresentation.

    In any event, the misrepresentation led directly to an overstatement of goodwill.

    In fact, had I known the true state of affairs I would not have contracted in the first instance.

    The truth only came out some 8 months after I had taken ownership. I subsequently sued for overstatement of purchase price and consequential damages and won.

    The point to bear in mind is that initial representations made by the seller regarding performance cannot simply be negated by the usual clause in the eventual sale agreement whereby the seller makes no warranty etc etc. If the seller misleads you at any stage prior, then it is what is, misrepresentation. And that has consequences.

    From what you say the seller did not misrepresent the figures, but that the pending sale impacted on them down the line?

  11. Thanks given for this post:

    Dave A (24-Jul-14)

  12. #10
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    22,648
    Thanks
    3,304
    Thanked 2,676 Times in 2,257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Perhaps another issue to interrogate is why are existing clients terminating their contract?

    If a proper hand-over process is in place, it really shouldn't be as a result of the change in ownership. Ordinarily existing, happy clients will take a "wait-and-see" approach if they get to hear about a change in ownership. Jumping ship before the event is... a bit unusual.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Negotiating in good faith
    By Dave A in forum Labour Relations and Legislation Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 16-Feb-11, 02:24 PM
  2. Government to lower BEE revenue threshold...
    By anakin in forum BEE and Employment Equity Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-Jan-11, 09:05 PM
  3. Buying a business
    By TedP in forum General Business Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 15-Oct-10, 12:08 PM
  4. Revenue Service extends business hours
    By I Robot in forum Tax Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27-May-09, 04:59 PM

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •