Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 35

Thread: mega - alteration to electrical installation

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    cape town
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    mega - alteration to electrical installation

    I wonder if someone can help me. I stay in a very old house " fuses instead of c/breakers" A few years ago a electrician installed a new geyser and
    on the wooden board a e/leakage and a sp&n. The e/leakage only switches off the sp&n. If i sell my house (1) Do i need to upgrade my d/b to c/breakers and (2) when the e/leakage was installed should my plug circuit not have been put on e/leakage.

  2. #2
    Email problem
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    cape town
    Posts
    308
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 43 Times in 37 Posts
    the electrician only needed to make the geyser circuit compliant ( if thats what he was working on). a geyser doesnt have to be on e/leakage though.
    if i do a coc i insist on getting rid of all fuses and install a new db. fuses arent allowed in domestic installations. however there was some clause about houses built before a certain date.

  3. #3
    Silver Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Germiston, South Africa
    Posts
    398
    Thanks
    24
    Thanked 47 Times in 43 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mega View Post
    I wonder if someone can help me. I stay in a very old house " fuses instead of c/breakers" A few years ago a electrician installed a new geyser and
    on the wooden board a e/leakage and a sp&n. The e/leakage only switches off the sp&n. If i sell my house (1) Do i need to upgrade my d/b to c/breakers and (2) when the e/leakage was installed should my plug circuit not have been put on e/leakage.
    I dont understand the term sp&n

    The certificate should have been issued when the work was completed

    With the installation of a new geyser comes the requirement for a geyser isolator.
    The installation of a geyser isolator is regarded as an alteration to the existing circuit.
    The addition of an earth leakage would have also been regarded as an alteration to the circuit.

    Now read the portion of the Regulations below, especially section (3) in whole

    Certificate of compliance
    7. (1) Subject to the provisions of subregulation (3), every user or lessor of an electrical installation, as the case may be, shall have a valid certificate of compliance for that installation in the form of Annexure 1, which shall be accompanied by a test report in the format approved by the chief inspector, in respect of every such electrical installation.
    (2)
    Subject to the provisions of subregulation (3), every user or lessor of an electrical installation, as the case may be, shall on request produce the certificate of compliance for that electrical installation to an inspector, a supplier or, subject to regulation 4(1), an approved inspection authority for electrical installations.
    (3)
    Subregulation (1) shall not apply to an electrical installation that existed prior to 23 October 1992, and where there was no change of ownership after 1 March 1994: Provided that, if any addition or alteration is effected to such an electrical installation, the user or lessor of the electrical installation, as the case may be, shall obtain a certificate of compliance for the whole electrical installation, whereafter the provisions of subregulation (1) shall be applicable to such electrical installation.


    In order to issue the said certificate the db board must be brought into compliance with the latest regulations in force at the time of the alteration.
    This requires that the fuses be removed and circuit breakers be installed

    Yes your plugs must be fed from an earth leakage

    Your electrical installation is now non-compliant and your insurance company have the right to repudiate any insurance claim resulting from an electrical fault, as set out in your contract with them.
    To make a mistake is human, to learn from that mistake is knowledge and knowledge is strength.

  4. Thank given for this post:

    AndyD (29-Jul-13), Dave A (30-Jul-13)

  5. #4
    Diamond Member AndyD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    4,924
    Thanks
    576
    Thanked 934 Times in 755 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Leecatt View Post
    I dont understand the term sp&n
    SP&N MCB is a single pole and neutral minature circuit breaker. It's actually a 2-pole device that isolates the phase and neutral when tripped. They usually only monitor the phase conductor for overload and they incorporate thermal and magnetic tripping mechanisms. I think (but I might be wrong) that they're also staggered trip with live pole being first to break and last to make when reset. The CBI samite mount version has a lever that's half green and half white which denotes overload protection on the live pole and isolation only on the neutral side.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	QAN2-13-10A-240V-1+N-SAMITE-CBI-BREAKER.png 
Views:	1628 
Size:	25.0 KB 
ID:	3753
    _______________________________________________

    _______________________________________________

  6. #5
    Silver Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Germiston, South Africa
    Posts
    398
    Thanks
    24
    Thanked 47 Times in 43 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by AndyD View Post
    SP&N MCB is a single pole and neutral minature circuit breaker. It's actually a 2-pole device that isolates the phase and neutral when tripped. They usually only monitor the phase conductor for overload and they incorporate thermal and magnetic tripping mechanisms. I think (but I might be wrong) that they're also staggered trip with live pole being first to break and last to make when reset. The CBI samite mount version has a lever that's half green and half white which denotes overload protection on the live pole and isolation only on the neutral side.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	QAN2-13-10A-240V-1+N-SAMITE-CBI-BREAKER.png 
Views:	1628 
Size:	25.0 KB 
ID:	3753
    Thanks Andy, I know it as an isolator circuit breaker.
    To make a mistake is human, to learn from that mistake is knowledge and knowledge is strength.

  7. #6
    New Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    SP&N or two singles

    Quote Originally Posted by AndyD View Post
    SP&N MCB is a single pole and neutral minature circuit breaker. It's actually a 2-pole device that isolates the phase and neutral when tripped. They usually only monitor the phase conductor for overload and they incorporate thermal and magnetic tripping mechanisms. I think (but I might be wrong) that they're also staggered trip with live pole being first to break and last to make when reset. The CBI samite mount version has a lever that's half green and half white which denotes overload protection on the live pole and isolation only on the neutral side.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	QAN2-13-10A-240V-1+N-SAMITE-CBI-BREAKER.png 
Views:	1628 
Size:	25.0 KB 
ID:	3753
    I couldn't get a 50Amp SP&N. So I bought 2x 50amp single breakers. Can I use these 2 single 50amp breakers and just connect there 2 levers with a piece of wire or toothpick (and colour the one lever green) If the live tripit will take the neutral with via the "toothpick"
    I'm living 90kms away from the suppliers, so it is not easy just to go down the road and pick one up. The question is, is this acceptable?

    Thanks for a helpfull answer.

  8. #7
    Silver Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Germiston, South Africa
    Posts
    398
    Thanks
    24
    Thanked 47 Times in 43 Posts

    Unhappy

    Quote Originally Posted by Leecatt View Post

    Certificate of compliance
    7. (1) Subject to the provisions of subregulation (3), every user or lessor of an electrical installation, as the case may be, shall have a valid certificate of compliance for that installation in the form of Annexure 1, which shall be accompanied by a test report in the format approved by the chief inspector, in respect of every such electrical installation.
    (2)
    Subject to the provisions of subregulation (3), every user or lessor of an electrical installation, as the case may be, shall on request produce the certificate of compliance for that electrical installation to an inspector, a supplier or, subject to regulation 4(1), an approved inspection authority for electrical installations.
    (3)
    Subregulation (1) shall not apply to an electrical installation that existed prior to 23 October 1992, and where there was no change of ownership after 1 March 1994: Provided that, if any addition or alteration is effected to such an electrical installation, the user or lessor of the electrical installation, as the case may be, shall obtain a certificate of compliance for the whole electrical installation, whereafter the provisions of subregulation (1) shall be applicable to such electrical installation.

    Now i'm going to get my a*se kicked!

    I've led you all down the wrong path by mistake, but no-one picked it up, so in my defence perhaps were all bozo's.

    The above quote (3) says that if the house existed prior to 23/10/1992 then it does not need a coc, UNTILL an addition or alteration takes place then the whole house needs to be certified. That makes sense, you cant make a coc just for the addition if you have no original coc to add it onto.
    By inference, if the house existed after 23/10/1992, then it must already be covered by an existing, VALID certificate provided of course that regular maintenance was performed.

    Thereafter, subsection (4) should take precedence (and in my wisdom I neglected to add it on before)

    (4)
    Where any addition or alteration has been effected to an electrical installation for which a certificate of compliance was previously issued, the user or lessor of such electrical installation shall obtain a certificate of compliance for at least the addition or alteration.


    So,in my opinion, little has changed from before and I think i'm right this time.
    To make a mistake is human, to learn from that mistake is knowledge and knowledge is strength.

  9. #8
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    22,662
    Thanks
    3,307
    Thanked 2,676 Times in 2,258 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by Leecatt View Post
    I've led you all down the wrong path by mistake
    Nope, you actually got us started down the right path (with a little tweak in post 8) - I suspect you've just caught up with the rest of us.

    Quote Originally Posted by Leecatt View Post
    The above quote (3) says that if the house existed prior to 23/10/1992 then it does not need a coc, UNTILL an addition or alteration takes place then the whole house needs to be certified.
    Or there's been a change of ownership, of course. But when it comes to purely a matter of additions and alterations, that is exactly the challenge with unanticipated consequences we've all identified in a nutshell.

  10. #9
    Bronze Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Account_Deleted
    Posts
    165
    Thanks
    122
    Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Leecatt View Post
    Now i'm going to get my a*se kicked!

    I've led you all down the wrong path by mistake, but no-one picked it up, so in my defence perhaps were all bozo's.

    The above quote (3) says that if the house existed prior to 23/10/1992 then it does not need a coc, UNTILL an addition or alteration takes place then the whole house needs to be certified. That makes sense, you cant make a coc just for the addition if you have no original coc to add it onto.
    By inference, if the house existed after 23/10/1992, then it must already be covered by an existing, VALID certificate provided of course that regular maintenance was performed.

    Thereafter, subsection (4) should take precedence (and in my wisdom I neglected to add it on before)

    (4)
    Where any addition or alteration has been effected to an electrical installation for which a certificate of compliance was previously issued, the user or lessor of such electrical installation shall obtain a certificate of compliance for at least the addition or alteration.


    So,in my opinion, little has changed from before and I think i'm right this time.
    Not entirely correct, it says: "23 October 1992, and where there was no change of ownership after 1 March 1994:"

  11. #10
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Durban
    Posts
    66
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ACEsterhuizen View Post
    Not entirely correct, it says: "23 October 1992, and where there was no change of ownership after 1 March 1994:"
    I too cannot see anywhere that it states fuses are not allowed. The only place it could be is that the DB must comply with SANS 1765 and SANS 1973-3. I don't have copies of these standards so I cannot check there.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Electrical Installation Costs
    By Tracsec in forum Electrical Contracting Industry Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 28-Jul-22, 05:38 AM
  2. [Article] New electrical installation regulations
    By QUINN in forum Electrical Contracting Industry Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-Jun-14, 03:01 PM
  3. What constitues an alteration to an existing installation.
    By Leecatt in forum Electrical Contracting Industry Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-Jul-12, 12:40 PM
  4. Who may work on an electrical installation?
    By douw in forum Electrical Contracting Industry Forum
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 16-Apr-10, 11:57 AM

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •