Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Other qualifying medical expenses

  1. #1
    Full Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    61
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Other qualifying medical expenses

    Hi,

    An individual wants to have cosmetic eye surgury to remove the need to wear glasses constantly. This operation will cost R20,000.00. He is on his wife's medical aid and the medical aid will not pay this as it is cosmetic expenditure. Can and will this be allowable other medical expenditure in SARS eyes which can be included in the medical section of the individual's income tax computation?

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Diamond Member Mike C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Umkomaas
    Posts
    2,850
    Thanks
    249
    Thanked 371 Times in 327 Posts
    I would think so, althought I have no support for my supposition. Just because the Medical Aid does not pay it from their fund, does not make it any less a medical expense.
    No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted. - Aesop "The Lion and the Mouse"

  3. Thanks given for this post:

    Roger15 (27-Jun-13)

  4. #3
    Email problem Rafael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    129
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 29 Times in 20 Posts
    As far as I am aware it is not allowable as it is cosmetic, just as you can't claim for breast augmentation.
    You miss 100% of the chances you never take

  5. Thanks given for this post:

    Roger15 (27-Jun-13)

  6. #4
    Diamond Member Mike C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Umkomaas
    Posts
    2,850
    Thanks
    249
    Thanked 371 Times in 327 Posts
    I know that I am going a bit off topic here, but can it really be defined as cosmetic?

    Yes - the medical aid might prefer to pay for spectacles every year or two, but wouldn't it amount to a savings in the long run?
    No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted. - Aesop "The Lion and the Mouse"

  7. Thanks given for this post:

    Roger15 (27-Jun-13)

  8. #5
    Diamond Member Mike C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Umkomaas
    Posts
    2,850
    Thanks
    249
    Thanked 371 Times in 327 Posts
    Looks like Rafael is right.

    Got this from a SARS document on claiming medical expenses:

    The terms “necessarily incurred” and “in consequence of” are not defined in the Act. Therefore, they retain their ordinary dictionary meaning. “Necessary” is defined in the Concise Oxford Dictionary as “requiring to be done, essential,…needed for a purposes”. “Consequence” is defined in the same dictionary as “the result or effect of an action or a condition,.. as a result” This means that a prescribed expense does not automatically qualify as a deduction by mere reason of its listing. The expense must be necessary and incurred as a result of a physical impairment.
    The term “physical impairment” is also not defined in the Act. However, in the context of section 18(1)(d) it has been interpreted as a disability that is less restraining than a “disability” as defined.

    This means the restriction on the person’s ability to function or perform daily activities after maximum correction is less than a “moderate to severe limitation”. Maximum correction in this context means appropriate therapy, medication and use of devices.

    You will be able to claim qualifying expenses under section 18 as a deduction from your income (inclusive of VAT) if you or your spouse or child or dependant has a physical impairment that is not a “disability” as defined. These qualifying expenses will, however, only be deductible to the extent that the amount exceeds 7.5% of your taxable income.
    Physical impairments will, for example, include –
    • bad eyesight;
    • hearing problems;
    • paralysis of a portion of the body; and
    • brain dysfunctions such as dyslexia, hyperactivity or lack of concentration.

    Diabetes and asthma is recognised as medical conditions and not a physical impairment..
    No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted. - Aesop "The Lion and the Mouse"

  9. Thanks given for this post:

    Roger15 (27-Jun-13)

  10. #6
    Full Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    61
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Surely if you can claim your glasses as a qualifying medical expense? You can claim going to see an optometrist?
    It even says "bad eyesight" is a physical impairment.
    So surely one can claim this as deductible to the extent that the amount exceeds 7.5% of ones taxable income?
    Breast augmentation is not defined as a physical impairment as above.

  11. #7
    Email problem Rafael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    129
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 29 Times in 20 Posts
    Its best if you call SARS on 0800 00 7277 and ask them.
    You miss 100% of the chances you never take

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 17-Jul-12, 07:14 AM
  2. [Question] Medical expenses paid on behalf of an employee of a cc
    By Imp in forum Tax Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 30-May-12, 12:28 PM
  3. Vat on Fringe benefit - medical expenses
    By *A* in forum Tax Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 26-Sep-11, 01:49 PM
  4. Medical Expenses - Name on invoice
    By hugo in forum Tax Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 25-Sep-11, 01:43 PM
  5. Qualifying for beetle inspections
    By mikilianis in forum Pest Control Industry Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-Jun-09, 09:09 AM

Tags for this Thread

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •