Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: MOTOR INSURANCE RULES

  1. #11
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    22,662
    Thanks
    3,307
    Thanked 2,676 Times in 2,258 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Serve both the driver and the company.

    I take it you haven't employed the services of a lawyer yet...

  2. #12
    Silver Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    durban
    Posts
    419
    Thanks
    128
    Thanked 61 Times in 52 Posts
    Any agreement between the Lady &/or company & its drivers is no concern of yours. That is their private arrangement. You go for the owner, be it the lady/company,served as well to the driver as Dave suggests. I take it that you have managed to get the name of the registered owner of the vehicle via the licensing offices.

  3. #13
    Diamond Member Justloadit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    3,488
    Thanks
    137
    Thanked 695 Times in 593 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Always take lots of pictures when you have an accident. There is no repudiating what the accident entailed.
    Almost every cellphone has a camera, use it.
    Victor - Knowledge is a blessing or a curse, your current circumstances make you decide!
    Solar pumping, Solar Geyser & Solar Security lighting solutions - www.microsolve.co.za

  4. #14
    Bronze Member msmoorad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    durban, SA
    Posts
    179
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 29 Times in 26 Posts
    i have a lawyer

    but was hoping to settle out of court- if possible

    now, i see that wont be possible with this lady

    hopefully she will end up paying much more through the court than what i would have been prepared to accept out of court.
    A “conspiracy theory” no longer means an event explained by a conspiracy. Instead, it now means any explanation, or even a fact, that is out of step with the government’s explanation and that of its media pimps.

  5. #15
    Gold Member Dave S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Randburg
    Posts
    733
    Thanks
    39
    Thanked 117 Times in 91 Posts
    The way i see it, if she won't be reasonable and settle "out of court", then go to court and go for the jugular...
    Today Defines Tomorrow
    Errare Humanum Est Remitto Divinus

  6. Thanks given for this post:

    msmoorad (11-Jun-13)

  7. #16
    Gold Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Vanderbijlpark
    Posts
    886
    Thanks
    83
    Thanked 381 Times in 298 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave S View Post
    Yes that was my take on it also, I asked the question as, when I was a young fella, I had an accident. I was uninsured, and the other guys insured suid me for R1300.00 (it was cheap to fix a car back then). I was still an apprentice and earning only R9.50/week, so I pleaded with the insurance company and they told me I could then pay his excess, which was R120.00. Like I said, tings was cheap back den...
    This practise has a long history. Prior to 1976 (if my ailing memory serves me), the courts were chocked with insurance companies suing insurance companies. Invariably courts would award 60/40. Obvious-blame issues naturally did not go to court. Insurance companies soon worked out that they were merely increasing the costs with all of the legal fees and round about that time they signed a knock-for-knock agreement.

    The essence of the agreement was that each company would pay their clients' own damages and only "ask" each other for their clients' excess if:
    - the client inquired
    - and there was patent and clear major fault by the other party

    Naturally this brought about conflict when both parties were with the same insurer or when one party had no cover. In the case of the latter, the insurer will attempt to recover the full damages from the other party, because being uninsured, he was never party to the knock-for-knock agreement. If the uninsured digs his heels in they will frequently settle for the excess, because that is most likely all that the courts will award.

  8. #17
    Gold Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Vanderbijlpark
    Posts
    886
    Thanks
    83
    Thanked 381 Times in 298 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by msmoorad View Post
    i have a lawyer

    but was hoping to settle out of court- if possible

    now, i see that wont be possible with this lady

    hopefully she will end up paying much more through the court than what i would have been prepared to accept out of court.
    As flaker said, her agreements with her drivers do not affect her liability towards you. If you use an attorney, he will presumably issue a letter of demand. She will almost certainly consult an attorney also and there is little chance that he will try to "go there".

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Disconnecting a gate motor
    By Leecatt in forum Electrical Contracting Industry Forum
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 05-Mar-16, 10:08 PM
  2. Motor suppliers
    By AndyD in forum Electrical Contracting Industry Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 14-Mar-13, 10:33 AM
  3. VAT on motor oil
    By J7J in forum Tax Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-Jan-12, 09:46 PM
  4. Rules is rules in Railroading
    By adrianh in forum General Chat Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-Dec-10, 07:42 AM
  5. NEW MOTOR INSURANCE OFFER
    By Phil Cooper in forum General Business Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 29-Nov-10, 01:39 PM

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •