Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: children and maintenance

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,346
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 254 Times in 209 Posts

    children and maintenance

    i would like to hear your opinion on this matter.

    lets say you get married to a women who has children...1 ...2...3 what ever...

    this wife and kids live in your house for lets say 10 years...but because you pay all the bills in the house and i mean all the bills in the house...food...bond...insurance...maid...etc etc etc ... all the running cost including school clothes etc....but during this period her ex husband never pays anything towards the kids...and nothing gets done about taking the ex to court for mainenance and so you just keep paying...the kids grow up finish school and...bam...she divorces you and screws you for everything...so you walk away with the clothes on your back...part of the divorce agreement is an amount which you now have to pay for maintenance for your kids which you have while married to the women...just to complicate things your kids are finished school but she chooses to hang onto them...so instead of her making them go out and ad work she chooses to pay for them to sit around at home...becuause in your divorce agrreement she was clever in the way it was drawn up...you only stop paying maintenance when they become self supportive...in other words start working.

    my question is what claim do you have against this women and her kids from her previous marrige...and at what point to you stop paying her.

    the catch is you have already signed the divorce agreement.

  2. #2
    Diamond Member AndyD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    4,923
    Thanks
    576
    Thanked 934 Times in 755 Posts
    Divource agreement aside, it's law that you pay maintenance for you children until they're 'self supporting'. I don't think there's an age specified so if your kids aren't self supporting until they're in their 30's then it's your burden for a long time to come.

    I'm guessing that as soon as they're no longer in the education system and can claim their own state benefits then you'd be off the hook.
    _______________________________________________

    _______________________________________________

  3. #3
    Gold Member Phil Cooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Midrand
    Posts
    645
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 170 Times in 118 Posts
    HOWEVER - both parents must support "in accordance with their means".

    So ex-wife must also contribute.

    And "self supporting" means that - until they work. BUT - you can go to maintenance court and apply for reduction if they are unreasonable and don't do anything about looking for a job.

  4. #4
    Diamond Member Citizen X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    lenasia
    Posts
    3,404
    Thanks
    868
    Thanked 701 Times in 613 Posts
    You raise an interesting topic which has relevance in our South African law today! The relevant legislation includes the Children’s Act 38 of 2005, The Divorce Act 70 of 1979. One must bear in mind that the law is not constant and enduring, entire acts are repealed and replaced with new acts, existing acts are amended in the form of deletion of certain sections or adding of yet others. . I’m reluctant to make a sweeping generalization but the Courts see the position of women today differently than they see women’s roles before 1994. You see men and women are equal in every way. When it comes to maintenance a court can make a maintenance order ruling for the woman to pay the man a certain amount of money every month or vice versa. Legally women must obtain gainful employment, this means that they cannot work for their favorite charity for free and expect their ex husband to maintain them. With equality of the sexes comes equality in parental responsibility and providing for one’s self!
    1. The general legal notion is that women can no longer rely on marriage or divorce for their lifestyle. They must go and work and support themselves;
    2. On the issue of children both parents, married or unmarried have equal joint custody, parental responsibility and parental accountability for that child that they brought into this world. This applies unless a court by way of court order decides otherwise;
    3. I’ll give you an example of something that transpired in my life recently, my friend’s sister is unmarried but she has a child. The child is 2 years old. The mother and father are separated so Miss X stays with her family. I extend kindness to people within reasonable limits. Over a 3 week period, over night, I noticed a situation where the grand father of Miss X, would call me and ask me to assist with baby related activities, i.e. take baby to doctor, take baby and babies mother for prayers for the baby and take babies mother to go buy food for the baby. On one faithful Friday I was literally busy, I was flooded with work, had no time to breathe. The grand father phones me from work and tells me that there is an emergency, the baby hasn’t eaten the whole day and that I must give the baby’s mother a lift to the shops to go and buy the bay food. I was really very busy, but since it was presented to me as an emergency, I left my work and went to pick up the babies mother to go and buy baby food . I don’t have children but I know that if a 2 year baby hasn’t eaten for the entire day, that child will be screaming and crying. When I got there, I found a completely different situation, the baby was at ease and seemed very content. It then occurred to me that this woman whom I don’t even know her name perhaps thought that over night, without my consent, without my knowledge and without my willingness, I would somehow magically become her husband and the father to another man’s child! That’s never going happen!
    4. Now, legally, let’s say the baby had no food the entire day, and I could not come by to give the baby’s mother a lift to go and buy the food, the law in the form of the welfare is not going to come knocking on my door! In fact, they wouldn’t even want to talk to me. The law in the form of the welfare would come knocking on only 2 people’s door, namely the mother and the father of that child and no one else. They would have then charged both parents with criminal negligence!
    5. A further legal problem in this scenario, is that I cannot intervene in a child’s life without the consent of both parents. This baby’s father could have charged me criminally for involvement in his child’s life! In this scenario, the grand parents and Uncles, Miss X’s brothers and parents somehow erroneously believe that they have rights and a say in this baby’s life. They have none! The law is very, very clear, only the mother and father of that child have parental responsibility, accountability and a say in that child’s life unless a court decides otherwise!
    “Ubuntu is the essence of being humane" Desmond Tutu
    Spelling mistakes and/or typographical errors I found in leading publications.
    Click here
    sabbaticus

  5. #5
    Diamond Member tec0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    4,624
    Thanks
    1,884
    Thanked 463 Times in 410 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    It has been my experience that woman will find a "sucker" and get them to pay for their children and provide for them until they can find someone better and or until the child has grown up and is more "manageable" and less demanding. Also if the child has "health problems" that also becomes the "sucker's" responsibility.

    My only recommendation if you fall for this trap don’t get married. It doesn’t matter how hard these women push and they push very hard don’t get married.

    Quote Originally Posted by Vanash Naick View Post
    the grand parents and Uncles, Miss X’s brothers and parents somehow erroneously believe that they have rights and a say in this baby’s life. They have none!
    I got a question Vanash; If the parents leave the children "especially between the ages of 0 to 7 years of age" in the care of the grandparents and expect them "the grandparents" to buy clothing, feed them, take them to the doctor, take them to school, clean them and give them a place to sleep. They have NO RIGHT OR SAY IN THE CHILD'S LIFE? Do I understand this correctly?

    If so can said grandparents then SUE the parents for ALL the moneys spend? In this case it is more then R40200! to date.

    I really do think it is time for new bloody laws… In my experience modern parents are parasites! And yet the law protects ONLY THEM??? Now that is just BULL $HIT!
    Last edited by tec0; 26-Jun-12 at 08:50 AM.
    peace is a state of mind
    Disclaimer: everything written by me can be considered as fictional.

  6. #6
    Diamond Member Citizen X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    lenasia
    Posts
    3,404
    Thanks
    868
    Thanked 701 Times in 613 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by tec0 View Post
    I got a question Vanash; If the parents leave the children "especially between the ages of 0 to 7 years of age" in the care of the grandparents and expect them "the grandparents" to buy clothing, feed them, take them to the doctor, take them to school, clean them and give them a place to sleep. They have NO RIGHT OR SAY IN THE CHILD'S LIFE? Do I understand this correctly?

    If so can said grandparents then SUE the parents for ALL the moneys spend? In this case it is more then R40200! to date.
    Tec0, I understand where you coming from! In principal and from a moral perspective, parents who leave their minor children with the Grand parents, are saving a lot(expenses saved). They don’t have to contend with the cost of a crèche which ranges between R1000 to R4000 per month, they have the added reassurance of the safety and well being of their minor children; recently a 4 year old child at a crèche was raped; the grand parents feed and take care of the minor child so they also vest time and effort in this process. They don’t mind, because they love their grandchildren. From a perspective of fairness, the child’s parents should compensate the grand parents.
    1.Legally, the parents of a minor child can delegate parental responsibility to a third party. The mere fact that they entrust someone with their child’s care is sufficient evidence of having delegated parental responsibility to a third party. It is seen as consent. Provided that both parents consent to a third party taking care of a child, it’s perfectly legal. It does not have to be a formal a written agreement but the Childrens Act 38 of 2005 endorses a formal written agreement. The following sections are relevant here:
    “22. Parental responsibilities and rights agreements
    (1) Subject to subsection (2), the mother of a child or other person who has parental
    responsibilities and rights in respect of a child may enter into an agreement providing for the acquisition of such parental responsibilities and rights in respect of the child as are set out in the agreement, with -
    (a) the biological father of a child who does not have parental responsibilities and
    rights in respect of the child in terms of either section 20 or 21 or by court order; or
    (b) any other person having an interest in the care, well-being and development of the
    child.
    (2) The mother or other person who has parental responsibilities and rights in respect of a child may only confer by agreement upon a person contemplated in subsection (1) those parental responsibilities and rights which she or that other person has in respect of the child at the time of the conclusion of such an agreement.
    (3) A parental responsibilities and rights agreement must be in the prescribed format and contain the prescribed particulars.”

    “32. Care of child by person not holding parental responsibilities and rights

    (1) A person who has no parental responsibilities and rights in respect of a child but who voluntarily cares for the child either indefinitely, temporarily or partially, including a care-giver who otherwise has no parental responsibilities and rights in respect of a child, must, whilst the child is in that person’s care -

    (a) safeguard the child’s health, well-being and development; and

    (b) protect the child from maltreatment, abuse, neglect, degradation, discrimination,
    exploitation, and any other physical, emotional or mental harm or hazards.”

    “Ubuntu is the essence of being humane" Desmond Tutu
    Spelling mistakes and/or typographical errors I found in leading publications.
    Click here
    sabbaticus

  7. Thanks given for this post:

    tec0 (26-Jun-12)

  8. #7
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,346
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 254 Times in 209 Posts
    the way i understand it...if you are burdened with having to look after your grand children because yor kids are too irresponsible to look after their own kids...you could sue the mother/father or both for maintenance.

  9. Thanks given for this post:

    tec0 (27-Jun-12)

  10. #8
    Gold Member Phil Cooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Midrand
    Posts
    645
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 170 Times in 118 Posts
    If you don't marry, but have a child, you are as liable for the support as if you had tied the knot.

  11. Thanks given for this post:

    tec0 (26-Jun-12)

  12. #9
    Diamond Member tec0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    4,624
    Thanks
    1,884
    Thanked 463 Times in 410 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Cooper View Post
    If you don't marry, but have a child, you are as liable for the support as if you had tied the knot.
    Yes you are right. But in this scenario the child is not yours it is someone else's child and if you don’t marry you are not fully responsible for that child. And that is why these women will push for marriage because that will make you responsible. It is a sad reality actually that people will force their responsibility onto others.
    peace is a state of mind
    Disclaimer: everything written by me can be considered as fictional.

  13. #10
    Platinum Member sterne.law@gmail.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Durban
    Posts
    1,332
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 566 Times in 413 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7
    A court can always be approached to alter any maintenance agreement.
    If there is no maintenance agreement in the divorce decree then you can not approach the court to grant one, it is only done at divorce stage.
    Anthony Sterne

    www.acumenholdings.co.za
    DISCLAIMER The above is merely a comment in discussion form and an open public arena. It does not constitute a legal opinion or professional advice in any manner or form.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. [Question] Chip Fryer Maintenance
    By AmithS in forum Food Industry Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-Dec-10, 09:09 PM
  2. Do your electric fence maintenance now!!!
    By garthu in forum Technology Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 14-Oct-10, 10:38 AM
  3. Maintenance is not being done.
    By Dave A in forum Electrical Contracting Industry Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-Jun-08, 09:26 PM
  4. Planned server maintenance
    By Dave A in forum News Archive
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-Feb-07, 06:19 PM
  5. "Children abusing Children"
    By Candy Bouwer in forum General Business Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 22-Aug-06, 08:47 AM

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •