Dave, though I agree with you to a point it is a bit like saying I should buy a secondhand car from a dealer because lots of deslers have spent a lot of time and effort on marketing. I agree that it works for some, the doctor who doesn't have the time to drive from owner to owner looking at cars or the young lady who simply doesn't know enough about cars.
To stay with the analogy of cars, the salesman doesn't have the foggiest idea about the technicalities of the car, he has 50 cars on the lot and he needs to get them sold.
To get back to buying houses; (in a roundabout way) when we need to buy a car we compare cars, compare their specs, talk to our friends and ensure that the car has a perfect service history. (The great car salesman would have this all at his fingertips) Yet, when we by a house we walk around a bit, talk to the estate agent etc. We buy the house without plans, service history, and 90% of the time without even speaking to the previous owner or the new neighbours. We simply buy on subjective superficial observation and the say so of a third party (who sells it voetstoots because it is not his responsibility to look in the ceiling or check the plans). I am technically minded enough to look at deeper issues but what about the young lady that buys the house with the faulty electrics and is then told that 'she must sort it out herself' (She buys a nice secondhand VW Golf and when she pops the boot 3 weeks later finds that the spare wheel is missing because it was never supplied - then the salesman says to her, tough, you bought the car from me but I never said that I will check that all the parts are included)....Somebody needs to be held accountable and I contend that it is the salesman
I like to talk in analogies and here is another, when we go to a restaurant we interact with the waiter. The waiter doesn't cook the food, he merely serves the food, but, he is responsible to get the order right, bring clean cutlery etc, if the food is bad or the glass is dirty we do not get up a argue with the chef of tell the cleaning staff to clean the glasses properly, no, we $h1t on the waiter and it is his responsibility to sort the problem out. If he doesn't resolve the problem to our satisfaction then we refuse to give him a 10% tip (say R100 for a group of people). But we are perfectly happy to say that it is ok for an agent to take R62,500 and then say that nothing whatsoever related to the transaction is his responsibility....there is something fundamentally wrong with this picture.
Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.