Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Where to get HR Policies and Procedures?

  1. #11
    Diamond Member Citizen X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    lenasia
    Posts
    3,404
    Thanks
    868
    Thanked 701 Times in 613 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Andys69ZA View Post
    Yes HRS, indeed it does. I am mediating a workplace dispute and was researching how companies deal with criminal records. It's interesting that there is a wealth of information out there on almost every other aspect of a company's policies and procedures but very little of consequence on the subject of criminal records.
    Hi Andy,

    Could you perhaps provide some more information about the dispute?

    Off-the-cuff, I can say that being arrested or having a history of being arrested means nothing whatsoever unless the accused was convicted. Anyone can get arrested, if you file a charge of assualt against your neighbour, even though, he didn't assualt you, the police are still obligated to arrest him!
    Criminal Records: The best way to establish if an employee has a criminal record is to get the employee to obtain 'Police Clearance.'
    http://www.dfa.gov.za/consular/policeclear.htm

    Remember, in labour disputes, each individual case must be considered on it's own merits, the LRA must be applied where applicable and the company is bound by it's own disciplinary code and procedure..
    “Ubuntu is the essence of being humane" Desmond Tutu
    Spelling mistakes and/or typographical errors I found in leading publications.
    Click here
    sabbaticus

  2. Thanks given for this post:

    tec0 (30-Jan-14)

  3. #12
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Had enough
    Posts
    3,358
    Thanks
    114
    Thanked 213 Times in 201 Posts
    Off-the-cuff, I can say that being arrested or having a history of being arrested means nothing whatsoever unless the accused was convicted
    I'm afraid this is totally not true. If you do a comprehensive criminal check and pick up that a guy was arrested for theft and charges dropped, then lets say it happened again and charges dropped and this has happened in the space of two years ago, this is a problem.

    A client would ask us for 4 cvs of candidates to interview. If this guy is one of the candidates on the short list for the job he will fall off the list very quickly. It is a clients right to choose who he wants from a shortlist. He would certainly prefer a "cleaner" applicant. That is why I said in an earlier post, sometimes it is better to only use a criminal check that only picks up convictions, not everything, but sometimes clients want to know everything from the day he was born.

  4. #13
    Platinum Member sterne.law@gmail.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Durban
    Posts
    1,332
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 566 Times in 413 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7
    I would be doubtful if you will find a criminal records/acts policy.
    A policy is essentially a form of rule. No downloading mor ethan 2mb, no personal calls, if you use a car you must check for damage etc,ect
    A criminal record before employment or after, would depend on the offence and the actual job, there are too many permutations to make a policy as such.
    There are jobs where a criminal record will disqualify you, eg, casino work, security work and such. It will be specific offences ect that disqualify you.
    If an employee, whislt employed gets a record taht now disqualyfies him, then you need to follow an operational requiremenst procedure.

    the starting point will probably be does the nature of the offence go to the core of the employment relationship. Theft, fraud and such will in most cases be disqualifyers, in pre employement. After employment probably strong reason, if I work with cash then dishonesty will be more pertinent compared to a gardener. etc
    Assault may not be a disqualifyer unless it was a work colleague perhaps.
    Smoking dope may be a criminal offence but unlikely to effect the work relationship unles perhaps I am a preacher or an anti drug organisation.

    Hopefully these examples are pointing you in a direction.
    You say you are mediating a dispute which means there is probably an existing employee.
    Anthony Sterne

    www.acumenholdings.co.za
    DISCLAIMER The above is merely a comment in discussion form and an open public arena. It does not constitute a legal opinion or professional advice in any manner or form.

  5. Thanks given for this post:

    tec0 (30-Jan-14)

  6. #14
    Diamond Member Citizen X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    lenasia
    Posts
    3,404
    Thanks
    868
    Thanked 701 Times in 613 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by HR Solutions View Post
    I'm afraid this is totally not true. If you do a comprehensive criminal check and pick up that a guy was arrested for theft and charges dropped, then lets say it happened again and charges dropped and this has happened in the space of two years ago, this is a problem.
    I don't agree with this contention for the following reason: An accused is innocent until proven guilty. Should an individual be arrested but not convicted, the arrest can't be held against that person as he/she has not being convicted.
    “Ubuntu is the essence of being humane" Desmond Tutu
    Spelling mistakes and/or typographical errors I found in leading publications.
    Click here
    sabbaticus

  7. #15
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Polokwane, South Africa
    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Thanks everyone for your assistance. Yes I am about to mediate a dispute between employer and employer. Not 100% sure yet what the dispute is about as I only have a short synopsis from the employee who approached me and I cannot glean much from that except that it has to do with his prior criminal record and an incident that happened at his place of work. I am waiting for the employer to respond. Responses to my query have given me a good overview of the complexities involved, which is great.

  8. Thanks given for this post:

    tec0 (30-Jan-14)

  9. #16
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Had enough
    Posts
    3,358
    Thanks
    114
    Thanked 213 Times in 201 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Vanash Naick View Post
    I don't agree with this contention for the following reason: An accused is innocent until proven guilty. Should an individual be arrested but not convicted, the arrest can't be held against that person as he/she has not being convicted.
    Well would you hire someone to handle large amounts of money if you were told that he was fired for stealing money - a charge was laid but withdrawn ??

    Hearing and knowing this you would presume that a deal was made between the employer and the employee to pay back the money and they would drop the charge. But deep down that little charge is still there.

    So back to my question - Would YOU Vanash Naick hire someone to handle money/bank transfers etc if you knew this ??

  10. #17
    Platinum Member sterne.law@gmail.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Durban
    Posts
    1,332
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 566 Times in 413 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7
    Whether you have policy or not, an arrest or charge is always going to count against you, rightfully or wrongfully.
    As employee, one part says disclose and explain upfront, but you worry that will put you out of the game, the other part says keep quiet, but if employer finds out then you are toast.
    There is also the issue of if you must disclose a criminal record ( on the premise that you are not asked)? There is one case on this and court found against employee.
    Anthony Sterne

    www.acumenholdings.co.za
    DISCLAIMER The above is merely a comment in discussion form and an open public arena. It does not constitute a legal opinion or professional advice in any manner or form.

  11. Thanks given for this post:

    tec0 (30-Jan-14)

  12. #18
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Had enough
    Posts
    3,358
    Thanks
    114
    Thanked 213 Times in 201 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sterne.law@gmail.com View Post
    Whether you have policy or not, an arrest or charge is always going to count against you, rightfully or wrongfully.
    As employee, one part says disclose and explain upfront, but you worry that will put you out of the game, the other part says keep quiet, but if employer finds out then you are toast.
    There is also the issue of if you must disclose a criminal record ( on the premise that you are not asked)? There is one case on this and court found against employee.
    Quite correct. We have just had a scenario that the guy was honest with us and told us that he was fired for stealing. We passed this info onto our client (which we have to) and the client said no to the candidate ! His crim record came back clean, so obviously he was threatened by the ex employer and the employer actually didn't lay a charge and he thought it had been laid. Unfortunately he screwed himself by telling us and we had already passed the info on. But long story short - he never got the job - so yes it can count against you rightfully or wrongfully.

    Fortunately or unfortunately in the real world this innocent thing until proven guilty does not work. If you cause trouble you must expect to suffer the consequences !

  13. #19
    Diamond Member Citizen X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    lenasia
    Posts
    3,404
    Thanks
    868
    Thanked 701 Times in 613 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by HR Solutions View Post
    Well would you hire someone to handle large amounts of money if you were told that he was fired for stealing money - a charge was laid but withdrawn ??

    Hearing and knowing this you would presume that a deal was made between the employer and the employee to pay back the money and they would drop the charge. But deep down that little charge is still there.

    So back to my question - Would YOU Vanash Naick hire someone to handle money/bank transfers etc if you knew this ??
    To be clear, I wouldn't hire an individual who has being convicted of bank robbery to work in a bank! On this note, I will have no reservations whatsoever of hiring a person who has been arrested but never convicted. This person retains his innocent status until a court finds him guilty. Many people are arrested for extremely petty things such aas loitering. I beleive all provinces have this as a by law. Suppose someone attacks you in your property and you shoot that person. regardless of the fact that you acted in self defence, you are still arrested and charged with murder. The only difference is that you have a valid defence. So, if a person looks superficially at just what the pc at the local police station says, then it says, on a certain date you were charged with and arrested for murder.
    Does this make my position more clearer?
    “Ubuntu is the essence of being humane" Desmond Tutu
    Spelling mistakes and/or typographical errors I found in leading publications.
    Click here
    sabbaticus

  14. #20
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Had enough
    Posts
    3,358
    Thanks
    114
    Thanked 213 Times in 201 Posts
    Many people are arrested for extremely petty things such aas loitering
    Thanks but you eloquently skirted my question. My question did relate to THEFT, not loitering.
    But anyway its your opinion - it certainly is not what happens in the real world.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. insurance policies
    By murdock in forum Scam Alert Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 25-May-10, 04:33 PM
  2. [Article] Arbitration Stage Procedures - Witnesses
    By BBBEE_CompSpec in forum Labour Relations and Legislation Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27-Nov-09, 11:50 PM
  3. [Article] Arbitration Stage Procedures
    By BBBEE_CompSpec in forum Labour Relations and Legislation Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27-Nov-09, 11:47 PM
  4. [Article] CCMA Conciliation Stage Procedures for reaching settlement
    By BBBEE_CompSpec in forum Labour Relations and Legislation Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27-Nov-09, 11:37 PM
  5. NCA and Credit Life Policies
    By ara in forum National Credit Act Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-Jun-07, 04:15 PM

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •