I completely disagree with what they have told you Flaker. I don't know what exactly the legislation was 30 years ago, but what I know is that they were defind benefit funds meaning that when you retire you know how much you going to get while you alive, so if you died early all the contributions that have been paid by the retiree are lost, this is also called a life annuity. In simple terms say there are 10 people contributing R1000 every month, now they all retire and there is a pool of money(everything they contributed plus growth) let's say one of these people dies a year later his family will lose out because he only used a small portion of all he ever contributed,mlet's say that another member lives to 100 years old that would mean that he will get much more than what he ever contributed and his pension is literally funded by the member that died early. I hope that makes sense to you and I'm starting to think that this is what they told you then.
Since then thigs have change and now there are defined contributions pensio/provident fund, which means that you are not guaranteed a certain amount when you retire but all your contributions are used to purchase a living annuity(in case of a pesnison fund) that means that what you have contributed plus growth you will receive on say monthly basis where you have a choice to draw between 2.5 and 17.5 pa, of course it's your money so you decide the percentage and you will see how long it will last you for. Again the two sides to it is that if you die early your family will inherit the remaining amount of the annuity, but if you live long and the annuity is exausted then you don't have money to live.
In terms of preference I see pension fund being completely wiped out and I see only provident funds remaining. But bottom line is the company's contributions are claimed against tax and that's what matters to them.
The reason why companies and employees prefer provident funds is because the company deducts their contributions for tax and the employees have acumulated amount that they can take when they live the company, they don't have to wait till age 55. Please don't get me wrong, I see people not having enough money to retire every day and they panic, the money should be kept for reiterement but the provident fund gives you the flexibility and at the same time the money that you've paid tax on you won't pay tax again.
As a warning I would advice every single one of you to do a comprehensive needs analysis specifically for retirement so that you know where you stand in terms of how much would you need when you retire, how much you currently have, what is your current affordability, are currentlyna memeber of a fund or do you have a retirement annuity and so on, based on that, inflation, your age, goals, returns statistics and etc you will get an amount that you need to contribute every month increasing at certain percentage. If anybody needs help with it I will do it but I'll just say that it will be a mission to do that for say 200 people at once so if you are serious about retirement I would like to see you, discuss everything and then I will have all the figures ready for you and of course I'd expect to do some business with you. I'm not trying to be rude, but I earn commission only and no salary at all and I have secretary, petrol, internet, cellphone bills and etc to pay as we all do so with all due respect I don't want to waste my time doing the whole process for nothing. However if you are interested to see I can upload a summery of a retirement analysis so that one can see what it is like.
Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.