Tweet
The Concourt has ruled against SATAWU.
Liability for damages stemming from strike action is NOT unconstitutional.
Liability for damages stemming from strike action is NOT unconstitutional.
-
Anthony Sterne
www.acumenholdings.co.za
DISCLAIMER The above is merely a comment in discussion form and an open public arena. It does not constitute a legal opinion or professional advice in any manner or form. -
How long before the law changes?Only stress when you can change the outcome!
-
SATAWU is already trying to bring political pressure to bear, I believe.
Their argument is that the organisation can't be held responsible for the actions of a few errant individuals. Of course when an employee messes up, I'm sure they'll still argue it's the company's responsibility and the company must foot the bill, not the employee
Participation is voluntary.
Alcocks Electrical Services | Alcocks Pest Control & Entomological Services | Alcocks Hygiene ServicesComment
Comment