Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 49 of 49

Thread: open wiring

  1. #41
    Email problem
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Bellville
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    That is unfortunately true, there is no recourse if someone issues an invalid COC.

  2. #42
    Bronze Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Account_Deleted
    Posts
    165
    Thanks
    122
    Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
    So if a building's wiring (surfix) is all done with helacon connectors, no inspection / junction boxes, is it reg compliant (or not) because it is in the "inaccessible roof space?" or because the helacon connectors complies with reg 6.16.1.9 a, b, c, d and e.

    a) non-flammable,
    b) located as near to the appliance(s) as is practicable,
    c) permanently installed,
    d) such that they cannot be opened without the use of a tool, and
    e) readily accessible.

  3. #43
    Gold Member Sparks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Port Elizabeth
    Posts
    890
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 127 Times in 96 Posts
    No it is not.

  4. #44
    Bronze Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Account_Deleted
    Posts
    165
    Thanks
    122
    Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparks View Post
    No it is not.
    Please Sparks can you refer me to the specific regulations that clearly supports that statement. Also, 6.3.7 , 5.1.1 , 6.16.1.9 a, b, c, d, and e, 6.3.7.2 , 7.8.5.1: (IP4X Protection against wire, etc. Cannot be penetrated by a solid object 0.04 in. (1.0mm) or more in diameter) does not exclude helicon joints or terminations. Bearing in mind that most of these are excluded because it is an "existing installation" and falls under clause 5 only.


    ps I have a major issue at a casino where these helacon connectors was used (every single joint and termination to a downlight etc) by the contractor and now they want a coc. I would appreciate a good solid set of regs that clearly exclude this type of wiring.

    I am unsure about this issue and it is going to cost this client (+-1200 joints/terminations) money to redo all these connections joints and terminations into inspection boxes and junction boxes with glands etc. Also there will be a civil claim against the contractor and I really need to get my facts (and regs) very straight, clear and simple.
    Last edited by ACEsterhuizen; 25-Nov-14 at 02:27 PM.

  5. #45
    Gold Member Sparks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Port Elizabeth
    Posts
    890
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 127 Times in 96 Posts
    For the regs you will have to give me some time, but off pat you can see that the conductors are exposed and you know that joints must be within an enclosure.
    The Helicon while being an approved method of joining conductors are not a replacement for enclosures, they are on an equal par with porcelain connectors and insulated ferrules, would they be accepted if not in an enclosure?
    When the terminations are truly "inaccessible" (flat roof with no roofspace) it has become common practice to accept that it be excluded from the COC, however, I believe that the installer should still be held accountable.
    I will post the regs I believe to be of relevance as soon as I get some time to find them.

  6. Thanks given for this post:

    ACEsterhuizen (26-Nov-14)

  7. #46
    Diamond Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    planet earth
    Posts
    3,943
    Thanks
    153
    Thanked 317 Times in 287 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparks View Post
    they are on an equal par with porcelain connectors and insulated ferrules
    Sorry dont agree with you if you are referring to a "skrewit". The helcon connector is by far a superior product. It is spring loaded which means it is always tight and if installed correctly and there are no live parts which can be accessed with the standard test finger and cannot be disconnected without the use of a tool. What i would like to do one day is do some tests with my thermal imager to see how they maintain connected to a 25 amp load.

  8. Thanks given for this post:

    ACEsterhuizen (26-Nov-14)

  9. #47
    Email problem
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    cape town
    Posts
    308
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 43 Times in 37 Posts
    i agree with sparks.no matter how good a quality helicon is, it will still be classed as exposed,and should be installed in a joint box.
    i have seen a new product,a type of pvc round box that splits in half. you install it over the connections without disconnecting and reconnecting. it has a type of bush instead of the gland. i havent used it yet and not sure if its sabs approved,but it will make coc repairs a lot quicker.

  10. Thanks given for this post:

    ACEsterhuizen (26-Nov-14)

  11. #48
    Bronze Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Account_Deleted
    Posts
    165
    Thanks
    122
    Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
    Regs that exclude this type of wiring: The helacon is not SABS approved It was, but it has expired in 2011. It has NO IP RATING. Good solid regs i was looking for: (REGULATION 7.8.5.1 Joints in cables shall be avoided, however if required, they shall be made in an enclosure that affords a degree of protection not less than IP4X.)

    RCC- Helacons.pdf

    And also Hellermann's reply:

    "Ek het nou met Ken gepraat.

    Ek het vir jou die RCC sertifikaat aangeheg, dis ongelukkig al wat ons beskikbaar het.

    Hierdie connectors het nie n IP rating nie.

    Die connections moet in junction boksies wees. (6.3.7.1 Joints and terminations of cables, cores and conductors shall be made in accordance with manufacturers' instructions or the appropriate part of SANS 10198.)

    Laat weet asb as daar nog iets is waarmee ons kan help.

    Dankie.


    Regards,

    Jaco Jansen van Vuuren
    Internal Sales
    HT Logo

    Tel : +27 11 879-6600
    Fax : +27 11 879-6603
    e-Mail : jaco.jansenvanvuuren@hellermann.co.za"


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	expertise comes with age.jpg 
Views:	222 
Size:	20.2 KB 
ID:	5090
    Last edited by ACEsterhuizen; 26-Nov-14 at 07:58 PM.

  12. #49
    Gold Member Sparks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Port Elizabeth
    Posts
    890
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 127 Times in 96 Posts
    Sorry I never had time to look up regs, glad you found it.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Similar Threads

  1. [Question] Wiring under thatch
    By camrad in forum Electrical Contracting Industry Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-Sep-17, 05:32 AM
  2. [Opinion] What type of wiring?
    By 123 in forum Electrical Contracting Industry Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 22-Apr-10, 11:32 PM

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •