-
Very well said Chris. These guys are lightweights and miss all the opportunities for a good argument. As far as I am concerned the statement is a threat. If considered with Mal Emma's view of dispossessing farmers of their land, without compensation, it becomes an even more serious threat. They all miss the point!
My concern is how so called leaders such as Bloody Bob and Mal Emma and others get elected. Not so much that they hold the position, but I seriously doubt the intelligence of people who choose buffoons such as these to represent them. How can you complain and demonstrate because of poor service delivery etc and then still vote for the same crooks? Even if it is a race thing, there are so many black people that have better leadership qualities than most of the African "leaders" of today.
-
-
Silver Member
Blurock - Thank you.
Yes it is a threat ... just as me "celebrating" Christmas, or my birthday, at such decibel levels as to disturb the peace and tranquility of my neighbours, is a nuisance, and impermissible for being an infringement of their rights. My right to celebrate can never trump theirs.
As said, Judge Lamont has a marvelous opportunity in relation to settling prevailing mindsets. My mind has dredged up a phrase from my book.
It is - "some are good even the bad; some are bad even the good".
I love it. However, the point is that the law does not countenance such a situation.
It will always seek to delete "the bad" - always!.
-
Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.
Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.