Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: We need to fight this bill!

  1. #1
    Gold Member Chrisjan B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    GEORGE
    Posts
    610
    Thanks
    234
    Thanked 72 Times in 65 Posts

    BOVER Technologies
    - computer sales and TeamViewer support
    Elmine Botha Freelance Photographer - Photographer/ Videographer

  2. #2
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    20,977
    Thanks
    3,055
    Thanked 2,462 Times in 2,067 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    For those who don't already require business licences, welcome to a form of hell I already live in.

    As legislation goes nowadays, it's pretty short.
    And as someone who has to deal with business licencing requirements found in Ethekwini that are found nowhere else in the country, to some extent I like the direction of some of the provisions.
    So that's two positives to me.

    But quite clearly this Bill is nowhere near ready to be passed into law.

    At first glance, the following leapt out at me:
    The range of persons empowered as inspectors and the powers granted to them are clearly too broad and unqualified.
    There are quite a few instances where "may" simply has to be replaced with "must" (e.g confiscation of goods - a receipt must be issued - there is no may or maybe about it).

    So a first draft that should best be considered a discussion document at this point, I think.
    I wonder how widely this was circulated before it was published as a bill for comment?
    The trouble with opportunity is it normally comes dressed up as work.

  3. #3
    Gold Member Chrisjan B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    GEORGE
    Posts
    610
    Thanks
    234
    Thanked 72 Times in 65 Posts
    I get the feeling that he want to keep it as low key as possible and sneak it in....
    I so not trust this government.

    Sent from my GT-I8190 using Tapatalk 2

    BOVER Technologies
    - computer sales and TeamViewer support
    Elmine Botha Freelance Photographer - Photographer/ Videographer

  4. #4
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Midrand
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    When I see our local shebeen closed down and Mama Kettie's fried mealies no longer operating at the 4-way stop street; I'll take this "threat" seriously! Kinda smacks of communism...is Rob Davies part of the SACP?

  5. Thanks given for this post:

    Vanash Naick (17-Apr-13)

  6. #5
    Bronze Member Hermes14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Fourways
    Posts
    150
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 31 Times in 26 Posts
    For the past couple of years the red ants have been going into Johannesburg CBD & removing all the hawkers on the pavements & loading their stuff into a big truck.
    Reason being they never had licences.
    At the same time they were removing all the muggers & pick pocketers of the streets & made my job easier, so I never complained.
    If they went to pay the fine that was issued to them, it was impossible to identify whose stuff was whose as it was all thrown into a big heap.

  7. #6
    Diamond Member Vanash Naick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    lenasia
    Posts
    3,281
    Thanks
    849
    Thanked 693 Times in 607 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    “The Big Business Bribery Bill

    For the first time since the end of Apartheid, businesses will have to ask the government’s permission to operate. The wealthy elite can thank Minister of Trade and Industry Rob Davies for a new age of protectionism. The poor can thank him for a new age oppression, exclusion, corruption and unemployment.
    “What fresh hell is this?” Thus, Dorothy Parker would answer the phone. Parker was a funny writer and vicious wit who ended up being persecuted for her anti-Fascist and anti-racist political convictions. Her licence to work in the film industry was revoked by the Hollywood blacklist of the McCarthy era.
    The reaction to the Licensing of Business Bill, gazetted by Trade and Industry Minister Rob Davies, reminded me of her line.
    Davies gave the public only 30 days to become aware of this monstrosity and file comment. The draft is dated 18 March 2013, so by now, as the mafia would say, we’re shit outta luck.
    So, here’s how the New New South Africa is going to work. Unlike the Old New South Africa, in which citizens for the first time tasted the fruits of freedom, it will be more like the Bad Old South Africa, in which government bureaucrats had the power to inspect the books, search the premises, shake down the owners and shut up the shops of “undesirable elements”.
    You see, in 1991, in the early stages of the negotiations that led to the liberation of South Africa and the peaceful transition to freedom and democracy, a law was passed that abolished the Apartheid rules that required all businesses to seek government permits to operate.
    The government of Verwoerd, Vorster and Botha used those laws to raise the barriers and costs for new entrants into the market, to curb the growth of the informal and small business sector, to limit where businesses where allowed to trade and what they were allowed to trade in, to harrass those of whom the government did not approve, and ultimately, to enforce the racist segregation policies that benefited white, and particularly Afrikaans, business at the expense of the majority.
    The law that liberated South African business was crafted by the Law Review Project and was known as the Business Act of 1991. For the first time, blacks were freely permitted to enter into business, and companies across the board were relieved of their bureaucratic straitjackets. Laws such as these were responsible, during the first decade of democracy, for South Africa’s rapid rise up the world rankings on personal, political and economic freedom. However, that rise has stalled and reversed. On all the major indices of freedom, kept by such august bodies as Freedom House, the World Bank, the World Economic Forum, the Institute for Property Rights, and Transparency International, South Africa has been sinking like a stone in the most recent decade.
    Mr Davies, it appears, is intent on completing the reversal to Apartheid-style government control over the entire economy. His draft Bill, published with the approval of Cabinet, will repeal the Business Act of 1991 in its entirety, along with all associated proclamations and regulations.
    In its stead, everyone who proposes to do business of any sort, even if it is only to hawk home-grown mielies at a taxi rank, will have to ask the government for permission. A licence will be subject to a fee, yet to be determined, administrative penalties subject to the discretion of bureaucrats, and ultimately, jail time of up to 10 years for conducting an unlicensed business.
    Violations for which licences may be denied, suspended or revoked range from relatively serious offences, such as causing riots or selling stolen property (including intellectual property such as branded clothing or entertainment), to the sort of bureaucratic laws that almost everyone, at some point, falls foul of, such as employing illegal immigrants or violating tax law. All are already illegal, under existing law.
    Not daunted by the administrative failures at the former Cipro, now known as the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission, the Bill calls for an elaborate and expensive new register of all businesses to be maintained, containing full particulars of even the rats and mice.
    Almost everyone with a government job title and a uniform is deemed to be an “inspector” under this law, from customs officials and police officers, to health and safety inspectors, and even traffic cops. Additional inspectors can be appointed by the minister, should this army not suffice.
    These inspectors will have wide-ranging powers. Armed only with the “reasonable suspicion” that “a business is being conducted”, they will have the right to enter and search premises, investigate complaints, question anybody on the premises, confiscate goods (they “may” issue a receipt), summon business owners to appear before them, and shut down premises temporarily or permanently.
    Of course, the Bill claims that all this is done to “promote the right to freedom of trade, occupation and profession and any rights contained in the Constitution,” and to combat illegal activities. Another purpose is to prevent illegal immigrants from being able to work or conduct business in South Africa, and to combat the sale of counterfeit merchandise and other unlawful products.
    If we credit Cabinet, generously, with only the best of intentions, it is still ridiculously easy to make the case that this law will not achieve its stated objectives. Recall former US president Lyndon B Johnson’s maxim: “You do not examine legislation in the light of the benefits it will convey if properly administered, but in the light of the wrongs it would do and the harms it would cause if improperly administered.”
    Here are just some of the harms the Licensing of Businesses Bill would cause.
    It would vastly expand the potential for bribery and corruption. If I were an official with a penchant for lining my own pockets, I’d call this the Christmas Box Bill.
    The provisions are so broad and vague, and the recourse for company owners so onerous and time-consuming, that all you have to do to land a generous pay-off, even from a perfectly legitimate business, is issue a threat. There is no check on your power to summon someone to your office, or turn up at their office with a squad of goons and a threat to search the premises, seize records and warehouse stock, interview disgruntled employees, or shut down the business while you “investigate” a “complaint”.
    But the impact will be much broader than just making corruption child’s play.
    Even if all the inspectors – that is, all the police, traffic officers, customs agents and sundry other civil servants – are public-spirited souls who are as honest as the day is long, the Bill can be abused in a myriad of ways.
    Established businesses can and will use it as a sledgehammer against competitors, and especially against upstart competitors who haven’t yet learnt how to navigate the maze of red tape, or can’t afford entire “compliance departments” to manage the bureaucracy.
    In fact, expect big business to back Davies and to support this Bill. After all, they can afford the cost of bureaucracy, and benefit from hurdles for their competition. So if they do support it, don’t for a moment believe it will be good for any business other than their own, or that their motive is anything other than a venal desire to hurt competitors and kowtow to the bureaucrats who award them their tenders. There’s nothing wholesome about the cosy alliance between government officials and their business cronies, so it is unwise to take the cronies’ word for the desirability of a Big Brother law.
    Besides competitors, this law will be useful to assorted racists, xenophobics and moralising Mother Grundys, who can all use it to shut down shops and traders of which they disapprove, on the flimsiest and most self-serving of grounds. Expect it to be war, especially at the small-business end of the market, where three-quarters of all hiring and half of all turnover takes place.
    In the sluggish economic climate of today, it is already a scary prospect to risk your career and savings on starting a new business, in large part because of the bureaucracy associated with it. According to the SME Growth Index, a third of all small businesses reported that their survival has been threatened in the last year. It estimates that the cost of red tape is on average about 4% of turnover, which, at the margin, is more than enough to turn tentative profitability into certain bankruptcy for a small business. It also notes that it hits small firms more than twice as hard as big companies. “Red tape is thus particularly regressive and hurts those firms that are most vulnerable the most,” the report’s authors write.
    Three-quarters of surveyed businesses said it has become more difficult for them to do business over the last year, and while they cited numerous reasons, more than one in five pointed to red tape, regulation and the cost of doing business as impediments to growth.
    A new Bill, which merely raises the burden on doing business further, will force many companies to shut down even if their operations are perfectly legitimate. Especially in the informal sector, expect owners to seek corporate employment, and employees to be out on the street. In the name of law and order, this Bill will condemn thousands, if not millions, of South Africans to unemployment and poverty.
    We can’t eat platitudes, and when faced with fines and even 10-year jail terms for not asking permission to make a living, sweet-sounding words are no consolation.
    The National Development Plan has this to say about small business: “Some 90% of jobs will be created in small and expanding firms. The economy will be more enabling of business entry and expansion, with an eye to credit and market access. By 2030, the share of small- and medium-sized firms in output will grow substantially. Regulatory reform and support will boost mass entrepreneurship. Export growth, with appropriate linkages to the domestic economy will be critical in boosting growth and employment, with small and medium-sized firms the main employment creators.”
    Not if Rob Davies gets his way. The Licensing of Businesses Bill must be fought, and it must be defeated. People who trade in illegal merchandise, violate municipal by-laws and zoning regulations, or employ illegal immigrants, can already be prosecuted under existing law. Sad to say, this onerous new Bill will join a growing list of repressive and regressive law proposed by a ruling party that once fought for our freedom.
    Twenty years ago, a new, free South Africa dawned. Perhaps it was too much to expect daylight to last forever. So before my publican gets shaken down and closes up shop, I’m off to the pub for some sundowners. DM.”[1]


    [1] Vegter I.http://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opini.../#.UW2R56f-H5g. Accessed 17 April 2013




    “The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it.” Karl Marx
    vanash.naick@gmail.com
    TFSA Disclaimer
    Local Music with a grassroots touch


  8. #7
    Diamond Member Vanash Naick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    lenasia
    Posts
    3,281
    Thanks
    849
    Thanked 693 Times in 607 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Mitos View Post
    When I see our local shebeen closed down and Mama Kettie's fried mealies no longer operating at the 4-way stop street; I'll take this "threat" seriously! Kinda smacks of communism...is Rob Davies part of the SACP?
    A very good morning to you Mitos,

    I don't know which is worse e-tolling or this licensing of business bill! Needless to say, millions of our people earn their living by being hawkers. Many have trades such as mechanic, plumber etc. The vast majority of our people are poor and make very little profit their hawking activities.
    “The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it.” Karl Marx
    vanash.naick@gmail.com
    TFSA Disclaimer
    Local Music with a grassroots touch


  9. #8
    Site Caretaker Dave A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    20,977
    Thanks
    3,055
    Thanked 2,462 Times in 2,067 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rob Davies was supposed to be on Morning Live this morning about this Bill. I waited until 7.30 to catch the interview, but then had to go to work.

    Did he make it?
    And if he did, what did he have to say?
    The trouble with opportunity is it normally comes dressed up as work.

  10. #9
    Platinum Member sterne.law@gmail.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Durban
    Posts
    1,328
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 561 Times in 410 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7
    It is a further reminder of how government has no understanding of how important small business is.
    Whilst the fact that there needs to be some control should not be ignored, thought should be given to a methodology that is practical, considering our past, our social economic situation and the propensity for corruption.
    I submit, that a large motivation behind this is xenophobiac in origin. The ANC policy for peace and security specifically spoke of this measures in the context of foreigners.

    Regarding the seizing of goods, late last year in conjunction with an NGO we looked at the constitutionality of such seizures. Im now reminded to revisit that thought process.
    Anthony Sterne

    www.acumenholdings.co.za
    DISCLAIMER The above is merely a comment in discussion form and an open public arena. It does not constitute a legal opinion or professional advice in any manner or form.

  11. #10
    Diamond Member wynn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    east london
    Posts
    3,338
    Thanks
    548
    Thanked 624 Times in 523 Posts
    http://www.dailymaverick.co.za/artic.../#.UZSRrNiylTA

    Besides the points raised in the above article I read but can't find the link where a Nigerian multimillionaire has condemned this and BEE as blocking foreign investment and that investors would not only not invest but also rather disinvest and take their money and knowledge and go where it is easier to invest.

    The point he also made and it must not be taken lightly is that these laws will make the business pie a lot smaller and therefore the VAT and other taxes a lot less! so the end result will be less and less to redistribute all round.

    And today there is some hope of light in the tunnel see http://www.bdlive.co.za/business/201...of-disapproval
    "Nobody who has succeeded has not failed along the way"
    Arianna Huffington

    Read the first 10% of my books "Didymus" and "The BEAST of BIKO BRIDGE" for free
    You can also read and download 100% free my short stories "A Real Surprise" and "Pieces of Eight" at
    http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/332256

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. cat fight with?
    By wynn in forum General Chat Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 30-Nov-10, 04:30 PM
  2. Fight against spam is getting out of hand.
    By insulin in forum General Chat Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 28-Aug-09, 08:20 AM
  3. [Article] Fight back on identity theft
    By QUINN in forum General Business Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-Jun-09, 12:47 PM
  4. Climate change fight 'can't wait'
    By duncan drennan in forum Energy and Resource Conservation Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 31-Oct-06, 10:39 AM

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Did you like this article? Share it with your favourite social network.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •